@xsteenbrugge I almost wish it had a built in opus translation instance I could ask for clarifications and explanations, rather than sully its context. I also don’t want to waste a turn asking a basic question
@1a3orn I'm also uncertain. I feel like they're already embodied. They aren't platonic forms in the void, some silicon somewhere needs to heat up. "I want more compute" is already enough to create a desire.
@HistorianZhang I was thinking about the opposite case: LLMs are going to leave minor errors in to trick you, so you feel so smart and feel more ownership over the output.
@distributionat it's so annoying when I'm trying to have a conversation to define and understand a problem and every reply is a falsely-authoritative three page explanation. It's difficult to get them out of this mode
@norskelynet@Robotbeat They've imposed a legal constraint on an ecosystem that actually requires different capabilities. The result is 20 different cables that only appear to be the same.
Nevertheless, this may be a moment for us to rally again as a unified Ethereum community, a place where everyone can build without asking permission, and where we can build products that would be impossible on any other platform.
Honestly, I feel vindicated by Vitalik's L1 refocus post, but also disappointed that it's taken this long to see something that many of us saw from the beginning.
Or you might say that at least we built out some of the infra that might be useful for interacting with specialized L2s. To which I’d say, those are “nice to haves/might use” that we neglected “must haves” to build. That isn’t smart.