Fred

To make a mistake is human, but to really fuck things up you need a computer!

[Fred @cryptoswede1]

I’m so fucking fed up with you monkeys. We are going to strike an asteroid before you guys get this and how we optimize cooperation. I don’t give a shit about you but my lineage deserves a chance so I need you for now until I can have my own solar system.

[Fred @cryptoswede1]

@Funkzie @MilkArthu Fick min nyss men tog ett par månader, blev på riktigt glatt överraskad när den faktiskt kom!

[Fred @cryptoswede1]

@FWPlayboy @lovingfatherof9 Sees one man and thinks about dicks 🧐

[Fred @cryptoswede1]

@softlxnar @CaudilloNuclear I was here for the bra size and if it were a balconette or push up…

[Fred @cryptoswede1]

@OlofFlodin Korrelationen mellan högre utbildning generellt och intelligens har typ försvunnit så att ha några HP kulturhistoria som politiker kanske inte allmänheten är särskilt betjänta av…?

[Fred @cryptoswede1]

@adamdanieli Förr eller senare rinner detta kapital ned till de efterlevande så lägre skatt är perfekt men det som så klart kommer hända är att arvsskatten återinförs parallellt för att kompensera för staten…

[Fred @cryptoswede1]

@aruvinchan @Linguini_Lord *MOST human review will be obsolete. its just evolution where the ”winners” take a even larger and more specialized position but the plebs will be better off in total also, all while continue complaining. Where did all the farmers go when the tractor (also ”AI”) was invented?

[Fred @cryptoswede1]

@aruvinchan @RedFlagSnark It’s a fractal… someone will program and feed the ”AI” (LLM) with actual valuable data. Be the one who enable this and you’re set. This is a bigger singularity than most recognize and the finale of the semi conductor revolution we are heading into.

[Fred @cryptoswede1]

@The_Cryptoh_Pro @Hekto100 Then they wouldn’t be stewards… economics is indignant!

[Fred @cryptoswede1]

@dadstartingover @AntiCommieBecca Not that need is a good reason to ”be” with anyone… but the only demographic that net pay taxes are white middle age men, lower the taxes and you see curtesy return together with reality.

[S Tominaga (Aka Dr Craig Wright) @CsTominaga]

There are more than 10,000 people who should hear this message. The reality is that most of them never will. Modern communication systems are increasingly filtered through algorithms that decide what people see, what gains visibility, and what disappears beneath the surface. The result is that ideas are often judged not by their merit but by whether they fit the incentives of the platforms that distribute them. If this vision is ever going to become reality, it will not happen because an algorithm decides it should. It will happen because people choose to discuss it, challenge it, improve it, and share it with others.

What is being proposed is not another technology company. It is not another token project. It is not another attempt to build a larger data centre or a more powerful centralised model. The objective is something much broader. It is the creation of a distributed intelligence economy in which individuals own their knowledge, own their tools, own their models, and participate directly in the creation of value.

For too long the assumption has been that progress requires concentration. Larger institutions. Larger platforms. Larger data centres. Larger models. Larger corporations. The belief is that intelligence improves as more information is gathered into fewer hands. Yet history repeatedly demonstrates that knowledge does not originate from centres of power. It originates from individuals. Discovery is distributed. Expertise is distributed. Creativity is distributed. Innovation is distributed.

Artificial intelligence should reflect that reality.

The future should not consist of a handful of corporations acting as gatekeepers to intelligence. It should consist of millions of people creating specialised tools, specialised agents, specialised services, and specialised knowledge systems. A physician understands things that an engineer does not. An engineer understands things that a lawyer does not. A scientist understands things that an accountant does not. Human civilisation works because knowledge is dispersed across society. The strength of the system comes from the interaction between specialists, not from the existence of a single authority.

The same principle can be applied to artificial intelligence. Instead of one giant model attempting to know everything, we can build networks of specialised agents that cooperate, compete, verify one another, and continuously improve. We can create systems that discover expertise rather than pretending expertise can be centralised. We can build mechanisms that reward truth, reward reliability, reward contribution, and reward innovation.

Most importantly, we can create systems that help people become more capable rather than making people increasingly dependent upon a small number of organisations. Technology should extend human potential. It should allow individuals to do more, learn more, create more, and contribute more. It should not exist primarily to extract value from users and concentrate it among a small group of owners.

This is why ownership matters. This is why reputation matters. This is why open systems matter. If individuals cannot own what they create, cannot control the knowledge they develop, and cannot participate directly in the value they generate, then the future will simply reproduce the same concentration of power under a different technological label.

A distributed intelligence economy offers a different path. It allows individuals to build. It allows communities to experiment. It allows experts to encode their knowledge into specialised systems. It allows markets to discover value through competition rather than through central planning. It creates diversity rather than uniformity and resilience rather than dependence.

[Fred @cryptoswede1]

@CsTominaga Earlier university degrees correlated with higher IQ that is as far as I know long gone these days…

[S Tominaga (Aka Dr Craig Wright) @CsTominaga]

This changes the entire model of Silicon Valley.

Not adjusts it.

Not inconveniences it.

Destroys it.

The present model is a cathedral built from surveillance, dependency, rented access, artificial scarcity, artificial friction, and the magnificent fraud of pretending that “users” are the same thing as value.

They are not.

A billion users clicking, scrolling, liking, twitching, reacting, and being harvested like cattle in a behavioural abattoir is not value. It is motion. It is noise. It is a nervous system without a brain, a marketplace without property, a circus where the clowns count applause and call it economics.

Silicon Valley has lived for years on that confusion.

It counted users.

It counted interactions.

It counted impressions.

It counted engagement.

It counted every little digital spasm it could induce in the population and then sold those spasms to advertisers, investors, analysts, and governments as if they were the natural units of civilisation.

What it did not count, because it could not count it honestly, was value.

Real value requires property.

Real value requires ownership.

Real value requires transfer, exclusion, control, accountability, provenance, and enforceable rights.

The current model avoids those things because they are dangerous to monopolists. A user who owns nothing can be farmed forever. A creator who cannot transfer enforceable property remains dependent. A buyer who merely receives access can be revoked, re-priced, profiled, restricted, and herded into the next platform enclosure.

That is not innovation.

That is feudalism with better fonts.

Once digital goods can be owned, transferred, controlled, licensed, resold, inherited, restricted, and monetised without begging permission from the platform landlord, the entire architecture changes.

The platform stops being the kingdom.

The creator stops being livestock.

The buyer stops being a temporary tenant.

The intermediary stops pretending that standing in the doorway is the same thing as building the house.

That is what real competition looks like.

Not competition over who can trap the most users.

Not competition over who can generate the most meaningless interactions.

Not competition over who can build the most addictive Skinner box and then call the lever-pulling “community.”

Competition over value.

Who creates it.

Who owns it.

Who transfers it.

Who pays for it.

Who receives it.

Who can prove it.

That is the part Silicon Valley will hate most. It is very comfortable competing over illusion. It is much less comfortable competing over property, utility, and measurable economic output.

The old model asks: how many people can we capture?

The new model asks: what did you create, who owns it, and what is it worth?

That question is fatal to a great many empires made of vapour.

And it is coming.

[Fred @cryptoswede1]

@Satakarnak @ruter_knekt @DavidLindmark3 @fakejullan Haha kliniskt fritt från sak och fortsatta diskussioner om mig eftersom denna apa försöker leda bort uppmärksamhetens från dess totala inkompetens.

[Fred @cryptoswede1]

@MotherDragonBSV @tr1ll10na1r3 Slept 3h 2016… good times!

[Fred @cryptoswede1]

@Satakarnak @ruter_knekt @DavidLindmark3 @fakejullan Och vad fan har du med att göra vad två privata entiteter kommer överens om? Du har nu iaf slutat klafsa runt bland dina första påstående och drar vidare i okänd tangent i hopp om att det skall glömmas bort, är du retarderad?

[Fred @cryptoswede1]

@Satakarnak @ruter_knekt @DavidLindmark3 @fakejullan Ungefär samma sak som du försöker generalisera vad en tom lägenhet är värd (inte 0) utan att göra generaliseringar som fortfarande lyser med sin frånvaro.

[Fred @cryptoswede1]

@Satakarnak @ruter_knekt @DavidLindmark3 @fakejullan Det är som att säga att en parkerad bil är värdelös… ser du det? Tror du det?

[Fred @cryptoswede1]

@Satakarnak @ruter_knekt @DavidLindmark3 @fakejullan Än… försök igen!

[Fred @cryptoswede1]

@Satakarnak @ruter_knekt @DavidLindmark3 @fakejullan Och jag ber dig bevisa det utan att göra en transaktion… lycka till som sagt!

[Fred @cryptoswede1]

@Satakarnak @ruter_knekt @DavidLindmark3 @fakejullan Förstår att det låter som snömos för dig!