@Longhornkid2@catturd2 The evidence is pretty conclusive and the conduct clause on a contract doesn't require a court of law. They're generally triggered by the court of public opinion because making your employer look crappy is the entire basis of the transgression.
@BogoKarma@catturd2 But having to have a driver is a bad look. Of course, having a personal assistant who HAPPENS to drive? He should probably consider it.
@oldivet@catturd2 I was young and stupid in my twenties. By 30, I certainly had more than enough self control and sense to not do it. That dumbass is 46, and he's had decades of hearing stronger and stronger messaging against it. End of discussion.
@TheGazeAblaze@catturd2 I think a lot of then suffer from success disease. They're so used to telling themselves "I can do it!" and then pulling whatever "it" is off that driving under the influence seems doable, "no problem". Doesn't even occur to them it might not end well.
@so5994@catturd2 He was driving & too impaired to pass a field sobriety test. It displays horribly bad judgement & reflects very poorly on his employer, for whom he is one of the most recognizable representatives. You can bet there's a conduct clause in his contract exactly for things like this.
@agaric1_agaric1@FoxNews Imagine that. Whenever there's a glaring hole in their argument, they simply tell their useful idiot followers and cohorts to ignore it and make as much noise as possible blaming the opposition for conditions.
@OScott87683355@FoxNews That's par for the course. Every time DJT has fought the tide and sent federal assets into a blue city, the crime situation has improved, and the mayors and governors have screamed endlessly for him to butt the f**k out... but DON'T stop that gravy train!
@BartTeso@FoxNews Never say never... but that IS the way it usually ends up. More often than not, it's in a gun free zone in a blue city in a blue state.
@UrmsonJ52537@FoxNews He's tried and Democrat mayors and governors tell him to get the f**k out and take his agents and guardsmen with him. Maybe you should direct your anger at them.
@AngryMrBungle@ScottPresler It won't make a difference in election results... you HOPE. It WILL make it a lot less likely anyone with access can identify names on the roll who are traditionally inactive, and then issue "them" absentee ballots, won't it?
@factsovrhetoric@ScottPresler Okay, I get it. If the other side is allowed (hell, ENCOURAGED) to cheat, and you still win, shut up 'cause it's all good, even though it's clear they're emboldened to step up the cheating now. And WE'RE the ones looking like idiots? 🤣🤣🤣
@CampDavidAZ@catturd2 Just 1 case that makes it worthwhile to challenge the validity of pardons and commutations that were the result of the autopen.If JoJo the Clown didn't thoroughly review each case,have a solid grasp on the related circumstances,& then authorize autopen use, they're invalid.