rh wants pumps volume
rh wants hypes volume
rh wants prediction market monopoly
fomo wants pumps volume
fomo wants hypes volume
fomo will want poly volume
“insert X company here”
take your pick they are all chasing the big 3 in one way or another
$BTC
My feed currently: "Oh ah everyone anticipates Bitcoin to find a bottom around 50k in Q4, that's the reason it won't happen". Firstly, 50k should be touched liquidity-wise. Moreover, it's impossible to measure exact market sentiment based on X timeline, it's quite limited.
$DXY
Did you know that in slightly over 60% of cases Friday marks initial High/Low of an upcoming week (purely mechanically)? Couple it with clean HTF liquidity and 2 cracks in correlation formed on Friday. The sole thing left is to find LTF entry in an anticipated direction.
I am 52 years old. I have been working since I was 15 years old. I have no savings, no retirement, and will never own a home before I die.
And there is now a trillionaire.
$DXY
Did you know that in slightly over 60% of cases Friday marks initial High/Low of an upcoming week (purely mechanically)? Couple it with clean HTF liquidity and 2 cracks in correlation formed on Friday. The sole thing left is to find LTF entry in an anticipated direction.
I am not an expert on AI, but I have been thinking for a while that there sure is a whole lot of money pouring into the belief that current tech, built in sufficient quantities, will be enough to carry us into the future we dream of. But it is a massive bottleneck of real resources waiting to be disrupted by more efficient models/chips. The same thing happened to fiber while companies were spending billions to build out Internet infrastructure 25 years ago. Yeah they're growing GDP, but for what ultimate purpose? Multiple companies all hoping to run with similar end products (as far as average people can tell) on a subscription based revenue model. There aren't going to be four or five winners. Someone will have to lose spectacularly, and it will necessarily be one of the biggest companies on the planet when it does.
what happens to trading if AI keeps getting better?
Dwarkesh Patel asked Jane Street's head of technology the obvious question: if we get AGI, can't it just replace what you do?
his answer: "trading feels to me like AGI-complete."
"all of the different problems of the world end up influencing what you're doing in a trading context. trading involves figuring out what things are worth. which means making predictions about the future. and lots of different things flow into that."
in other words, to fully automate trading you'd need to fully automate understanding the entire world. every geopolitical event, every supply chain shift, every behavioral pattern, every regulatory change, it all feeds into price.
and even at a firm running tens of thousands of GPUs with sub-100-nanosecond execution: "many of your most profitable days happen when weird stuff happens and nobody knows what's going on. doing that well involves human judgment. we think humans work better than models through phase transitions."
his conclusion: "i have never been more desperate to hire more engineers and traders than i am today. everything people are doing is more valuable than it was."
so what does this mean for the rest of us?
if the most automated trading firm on earth is saying humans matter more not less. the implication is that AI doesn't shrink the opportunity in trading. it raises the bar for what each person can do. the traders who learn to use these tools will pull further ahead. the ones who don't will fall further behind.
🚨 Wayne Rooney on how Cristiano Ronaldo became who he is :
“When Cristiano Ronaldo first arrived at Manchester United, you could already tell he was different. The talent was obvious, everyone could see that. But what shocked us most wasn’t the tricks or the pace ,it was the obsession. Training would finish, lads would head inside, but Cristiano stayed out there. Extra shooting drills. Extra sprints. Extra gym sessions. Day after day.
Sometimes you’d think he’d finally had enough, then you’d look back and he was still running hills or practicing free-kicks in the dark. He treated every training session like a cup final. It wasn’t just talent alone that made him great , it was madness mixed with discipline. A level of dedication I’ve honestly never seen from anyone else.
That’s why he became Cristiano Ronaldo. Not because he wanted to be one of the best… but because he refused to be anything less.”