Richard

(Pronouns:Te/he/he/ha/ha) (Adjectives: handsome/magnificent)

[Richard @d1ckyr]

@CassiusAli37509 @GeoffNorcott It’s traditional when asserting to provide evidence.

[Richard @d1ckyr]

@GovTimWalz I suspect if they went in Klan hoods you might find yourself saying something. Forcing girls to cover up is as odious as racism.

[Richard @d1ckyr]

@MattAgorist @libsoftiktok This is about patient safety. Would it be acting like the woke left to sack a teacher who was found to be in possession of CP?

[Richard @d1ckyr]

@_Sam_Trades_ @libsoftiktok whataboutwhataboutwhataboutwhataboutwhataboutwhataboutwhataboutwhataboutwhataboutwhataboutwhataboutwhataboutwhataboutwhataboutwhataboutwhataboutwhataboutwhataboutwhataboutwhataboutwhataboutwhataboutwhataboutwhataboutwhataboutwhatabout whatabout

[Richard @d1ckyr]

@KimJohnsonMP It doesn’t seem to have occurred to you why for the first time in human history the people fleeing war and persecution are young men.

[Richard @d1ckyr]

@Crazyunfill94 At what point are civilized countries going to banish Islam? At what point do we find our courage and no longer indulge the whims of our invaders?

[Richard @d1ckyr]

@FaujiSenthil786 @Crazyunfill94 And yet the Taliban stops women becoming doctors, or even getting educated. So square that circle for us.

[Richard @d1ckyr]

@RaJhLal @D_Tarczynski They do all have one thing in common. They were raised in a foreign country with alien cultural values. Those that seek to hold onto those cultures at the expense of assimilation should go back.

[Richard @d1ckyr]

@Jeffreyusha533 @DickyRoe @visegrad24 For anyone passing by, this is just a marker I use to reply to accounts that block me but only after an abusive parting shot. This informs you of the type of account it is and the character of the person using it. To reciprocate, I shall block them as soon as this message is sent

[Richard @d1ckyr]

@RHHassall @carolecadwalla Believes? Surely after 6 years you’d have something more than belief if it were true.

[Richard @d1ckyr]

@louGwake @chrischirp You’re still about to go on social media so can we presume that you’re not dying? If you’ve never felt worse than having a condition that allows you to tap away then you’ve been very lucky.

[Richard @d1ckyr]

@chrischirp So now you don’t trust them? Your agenda is so blatant by now

[Richard @d1ckyr]

@WhatIsAWomanBot @TerranRich Of course I did. But the article is about gender fluidity, not sex fluidity, no matter what it’s strap line says. And the stereotypes it criticises are essential to any understanding of gender. Gender theory reinforces gender role stereotypes. That’s your problem

[Richard @d1ckyr]

@WhatIsAWomanBot @TerranRich Vice, eh? We aren’t talking about gender binary, because gender is a feeling of conforming to outmoded stereotypes. We are talking about the sex binary.

[Richard @d1ckyr]

@WhatIsAWomanBot @TerranRich Saying what a female is doesn’t require scientific research because it is a word describing a well established (centuries old) concept. Any deviation from sex being a binary requires you to provide proof that anyone has ever been able to produce eggs and sperm

[Richard @d1ckyr]

@TerranRich There has never been a human who cannot be characterised as male or female but despite that, exceptions to a rule do not invalidate the rule. Humans have one head and a conjoined twin doesn’t alter that. Secondary sex characteristics don’t define sex, primary ones do

[Richard @d1ckyr]

@TerranRich …and hermaphroditism does not exist in humans

[Richard @d1ckyr]

@TerranRich A minority opinion not cited by any credible scientists. Sex is the ultimate binary because there has never been an example of any individual able to produce eggs and sperm. You cannot get more binary than that, however many abnormalities you cite. Intersex is one or the other…

[Richard @d1ckyr]

@TerranRich @WhatIsAWomanBot And yet, despite your googling, there is still no scientific reference to female not being a biological term to describe the egg producer.

[Richard @d1ckyr]

@TerranRich @WhatIsAWomanBot “Affirms the validity”? Do you realise how utterly meaningless that expression is? Do I affirm the validity of my car. Does my dog affirm the validity of his bed?
An arguments is valid. A passport is valid. A person can’t be valid.