@CineNerdle Ok tbf he does wear it in the 2009 reboot. So it scans if that's what the author meant. Of course then the author has to admit they chose to reference that movie. Rock and a hard place, I'd say.
Sorry for the spoiler for today's @CineNerdle, but Reverse themes are supposed to be represented by 4 movies, not 4 franchises, and there is no iconic mask in Friday the 13th. Get your act together!
There is no better example of being torn between two feelings than when you come home and your dog is so excited to see you that she pees all over you.
@Ada_Palmer I just finished PTS and I'm crying, partly bc it's what I do when a story I love ends, but also bc beautiful as it is, I can't stop thinking about the unremembered billions that future wouldn't bring back (which will probably include me).
My warmest thanks. Truly.
Correction: The image above was from the conclusion of the 2020 McHugh Report (which Craig did not oversee) not the 2019 Sherrell-Eber Report (which he did). The relevant excerpt from the Sherrell-Eber conclusion is pictured here.
On 8/1/19 @coons_christian met with @bgsu Dean Raymond Craig (https://t.co/w948r3eJkp).
Craig oversaw the report on Coons' allegations about the 2016 hire [image: conclusion]. I believe nothing further has been done about Craig's own allegations of unethical/illegal activity.
@aspiran70754400 @GorinMoti @coons_christian@bgsu Absolutely. I’m hoping to be able to provide a full transcript but it’s slow-going (almost two hours). If you’d like you can hear the whole thing here: https://t.co/eGCiU1muH4
@GorinMoti @coons_christian@bgsu It’s hard to describe how bizarre the tone was. Craig makes it sound like Coons is too worried about his image and failing to see how serious it would be if action were taken, dancing around the idea that action needs to be taken simply because the hires were unethical/illegal.
@GorinMoti @coons_christian@bgsu Coons can confirm, but my understanding is that it was issued after the meeting, but the dean had (unbeknownst to Coons) closed the investigation in May. This is especially remarkable because a lot of the meeting is the dean saying he’ll be soliciting more evidence from Coons.
@FormoftheFalcon@kvallier@coons_christian@bgsu@vallier I believe he was “recommended for discipline” but then @bgsu backed off when he got a lawyer. However, Vallier’s complaint included the same boilerplate about a hostile work environment that’s being used in the current round of disciplinary action.
Second thread about @kvallier's complaint to @bgsu against @coons_christian for emails that "contain multiple falsehoods, and are clearly intended to harm me, and other members of my department." My main aim is to help corroborate Coons' claim that he and others face retaliation.
@JuliaRingma@coons_christian did email some grad students about the speaker, so he may have set the ball rolling, but he had many complaints beyond the Twitter stuff, and I believe students found a lot themselves (plus I don't know how Vallier would know he "spent hours" looking for dirt).
OTOH I'm told multiple faculty criticized or threatened students in response to the letter. @BrandonWarmke called it "an act of war." I've received further specifics—many quite serious—but been asked not to share, even anonymously, due explicitly to fear of further retaliation.
It doesn't ask that the speaker be uninvited. It doesn't even say students won't attend, only suggests those who don't should be excused. And when the speaker cancelled, they were promptly reinvited, despite this "destructive" "mistreatment." (Covid nixed the replacement talk.)