Dani Rahmawan

Unidentified Living Object

[Dani Rahmawan @d_rahm]

@fiif_ardani @AnggaPutraF ya udah di sebutkan di pargraf terakhir, "tapi masalah lain pasti ada"

[Dani Rahmawan @d_rahm]

@kozirama Kemarin Depok juga listrik mati hampir 2 jam,

[A. Ainur Rohman @ainurohman]

Teknik cherry-picking ini khas banget hasbara.

✅Bilang UNIFIL belum yakin kan bukan berarti pelakunya bukan Israel. Ini standar prosedur diplomatik. Tp laporan2 lapangan menunjukkan pola serangan bahwa proyektil datang dari arah posisi IDF dan mengenai titik pengamatan yg sudah diketahui koordinatnya oleh Israel. Dan ini telah dilakukan berulang kali.

✅Ngambil kalimat "belum yakin" dari Al Jazeera bukan berarti Al Jazeera membenarkan narasi Israel. Justru dlm laporan2 Al Jazeera yang lebih komprehensif, ada rekaman video, saksi mata, dan laporan kerusakan yang secara konsisten merujuk pada tembakan tank Merkava dan serangan udara Israel di area tersebut.

✅Coba cek, Netanyahu secara terbuka pernah minta Sekjen PBB menarik pasukan UNIFIL dari Lebanon Selatan. Saat permintaan itu ditolak, serangan pd pos2 UNIFIL meningkat.

Siapa yg punya motif paling besar untuk mengganggu, menakuti, menyerang pasukan UNIFIL di perbatasan? Jawabannya, Israel, pihak yg merasa diawasi saat melakukan operasi militer.

✅Argumen "Yg bilang dibunuh Israel siapa?" ini teknik retoris basi utk mengalihkan beban pembuktian.

Yang mengatakan pelaku pembunuhan adalah Israel itu banyak. Negara2 lain kayak Italia, Prancis, dan Spanyol yg pasukannya ada di Lebanon Selatan udah resmi mengecam Israel atas serangan ini.

Jean-Pierre Lacroix (Kepala Urusan Penjaga Perdamaian PBB) juga konsisten melaporkan bahwa tentara perdamaian jd sasaran langsung oleh Israel di beberapa insiden spesifik.

✅ Fuck you🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕

[Dani Rahmawan @d_rahm]

@Shudbam @jhonsitorus_19 @officialinews_ sikat wc disuruh debat.

[Harrison H. Smith ✞ @HarrisonHSmith]

I might get killed for posting this, the least you could do is watch it.

[A. Ainur Rohman @ainurohman]

Aku baru baca tanggapan ini dan terima kasih sudah menjawab. Sblmnya, aku sudah berargumen soal tanggapan2 kalian terkait whataboutism ke sepak bola, soal eksploitasi, soal false agency, soal relasi parasosial, dll.

Tapi aku tertarik dengan kalimatmu yg ini:

"Kalau mau bicara dampak sosial, mari juga jujur melihat sisi lainnya. Fandom kpop di Indonesia sering menggalang donasi, bikin event kemanusiaan, bantu korban bencana, sampai patungan untuk aksi sosial atas nama idolnya. Energi kolektif yang katanya “fanatik” itu justru sering diarahkan ke hal-hal yang baik."

Begini, aku nggak pernah berniat merendahkan kompleksitas manusia dlm diskusi soal k-pop ini. Tetapi aku lebih fokus pd kompleksitas manusia itu sebenarnya telah dibajak oleh logika pasar.

Fans k-pop Indonesia tentu manusia yang kompleks dan penuh kebaikan dgn aksi2 sosial itu.

Namun sadar nggak sih kalau sistem k-pop mengubah kebaikan2 itu menjadi aset pemasaran. Siapa yg paling untung dgn aksi sosial yg kalian lakukan? Ya agensi2 Korea itu. Krn mereka mendapatkan keuntungan dari citra baik yg dibangun oleh fans.

Dalam teori ekonomi kritis, itu namanya ekstraksi nilai tambah. Agen2 Korea itu ngga cuma mengambil duit dari fans, tetapi juga memanfaatkan kerja moral fans untuk memperkuat brand image produk alias idola mereka.

Kalau kamu menggunakan donasi sebagai tameng moral dan alasan utk berhenti mengkritik struktur ekonomi k-pop, itu ibarat memuji seorang pencuri karena ia menyumbangkan sebagian hasil curiannya ke panti asuhan.

Masalahnya bukan pada sumbangannya, tp pada sistem pencurian yang tetap berjalan mulus tanpa gangguan apapun.

Dalam aspek psikologi, aksi baik donasi untuk korban bencana misalnya, bisa menjebak fans untuk merasa mendapatkan "izin moral" agar terus melakukan konsumsi yg nggak sustainable? Sadar nggak sih kalau memborong ribuan album fisik itu bakal berakhir jadi sampah lingkungan?

Aksi baik2 akhirnya hanya dipakai untuk menetralisir rasa bersalah atau kritik atas pola konsumsi yang destruktif. Kebajikan "kecil" berupa donasi digunakan untuk membenarkan partisipasi dalam sistem eksploitasi lebih besar yg dipakai agensi2 Korea itu.

Fandom k-pop Indonesia sebenernya punya kapasitas mobilisasi massa yg bisa saja melampaui partai politik atau serikat buruh.

Namun sayangnya, energi raksasa ini jarang diarahkan untuk menuntut perubahan struktur industri yang lebih adil. Misalnya menuntut transparansi kontrak idola atau menentang sistem gacha.

Energi besar "fanatisme" tersebut justru dijinakkan agar nggak mengganggu aliran profit triliunan rupiah yang dinikmati secara rakus oleh agensi2 Korea itu.

Sayang sekali..

[Dani Rahmawan @d_rahm]

wth, mau kemana sih lu ?? @ManUtd

[The Athletic | Football @TheAthleticFC]

Ruben Amorim has been sacked by Manchester United.

The Portuguese’s final game of his 14-month spell in charge was the 1-1 draw against Leeds United on Sunday that leaves them sixth in the Premier League after 20 matches.

Full story from @David_Ornstein here ⬇️

🔗 https://t.co/Gh8psoeh6J

[Sony Thăng @nxt888]

You accuse me of distorting history, but every part of your argument depends on hiding what came first and inventing what came after.

So let’s lay out the chronology you keep trying to smuggle past the reader.

1. "There was no Palestinian state."

Correct.

And there was no Israeli state either.

So why does the absence of one justify the replacement of the other?

Absence of a state is not absence of a people.

Indigenous existence does not require a flag, an anthem, or a European diplomatic category.

It requires presence, land, cultivation, continuity, and consent.

Palestinians had all of that.

Zionism did not.

2. "The land was Ottoman, then British."

Exactly.

Which means Zionism was never "returning to its own state."

It was negotiating with empires that did not own the land they were promising.

That is the definition of colonialism.

Your logic would mean Native Americans had no land because Britain claimed North America on paper.

You would never apply this logic anywhere else.

You apply it here because it is the only way to sanitize displacement.

3. "Jews bought land legally."

Some did.

But over 90% of the land that became Israel was not acquired through purchase.

It came from military conquest, mass expulsions, British imperial backing, planned depopulation, and the seizure of Palestinian property under martial law, all documented by Israeli historians such as Morris, Shlaim, and Pappé.

Purchases were not the engine of the new state.

Militarized demographic engineering was.

4. "Arabs rejected partition."

Of course they did.

Name one indigenous people in history who calmly voted to partition their own homeland so a foreign political movement could take half.

Partition was not peace.

Partition was expulsion on a map.

It offered Jewish settlers 55% of the land despite owning less than 7% of it.

Any people on earth would reject that.

Vietnamese would.

Irish would.

Indians would.

You would too.

Rejection of dispossession is not aggression.

It is the minimum dignity of any colonized population.

5. "Displacement happened because Arabs started a war."

Even Israeli archives contradict you.

The majority of expulsions happened before the Arab armies entered.

By April 1948, over 200,000 Palestinians had already been expelled.

Villages erased.

Massacres committed.

Land cleared.

Plan Dalet operational.

This was not a reaction.

This was a blueprint.

6. "Walls came after suicide bombings."

False.

Occupation, expropriations, settlements, curfews, checkpoints, and military rule began decades before suicide bombings existed.

You want violence to be the cause so colonialism can be the effect.

History shows the opposite.

7. "U.S. vetoes are fairness."

If Israel needed no protection, the U.S. would not have cast over 50 vetoes to shield it from accountability.

A nuclear-armed state backed by the world’s largest superpower is not living in "survival mode."

It is living in impunity mode.

8. "Jews are indigenous, Arabs rejected them, Arabs tried to exterminate them."

The record is not kind to this myth.

Zionist leaders openly advocated "transfer" long before 1948, and Ben-Gurion himself spoke openly of creating irreversible facts on the ground.

Jabotinsky declared that coexistence was impossible without "an iron wall," and the Haganah, Irgun, and Lehi carried out massacres and expulsions to secure territory.

Entire Palestinian communities were already being uprooted before any existential war had even begun.

Israel’s own historians have documented this.

You keep invoking Arab crimes to moralize Israeli strategy, yet you erase Israeli crimes to moralize your identity.

9. "Zionism is self-determination."

Self-determination does not grant the right to:

Engineer a demographic majority.

Expel another people.

Rule millions without consent.

Annex their land.

Impose separate laws, courts, and roads based on ethnicity.

That is not self-determination.

That is settler logic dressed as self-defense.

10. "I feel sad for you."

People default to condescension when the argument collapses.

You wrote a thousand words pretending the conflict began when Arabs resisted, and I am simply reminding you:

A people resisting displacement is not the origin of the conflict.

The displacement is.

So let me end with the one line you cannot erase:

Nothing you listed, not the rockets, not the wars, not the massacres, predates the core fact that Zionism arrived as a project of demographic replacement on a land already inhabited.

The project is the cause.

Resistance is the response.

And you can stretch, twist, and suffocate the timeline,

But you cannot reverse that truth.

[Dani Rahmawan @d_rahm]

@kozirama Wonders yang lain pertanyaannya "how" yg ini "why ????"

[Dani Rahmawan @d_rahm]

@jakpost p⁹

[Dani Rahmawan @d_rahm]

Forever our King !!

[Leyla Hamed @leylahamed]

At the Together 4 Palestine gig in London, Eric Cantona stood alongside ex-Palestinian player Mahmoud Sarsak, jailed 3 years by Israel, with a powerful reminder:

“FIFA and UEFA banned Russia 4 days after Ukraine. We’re 716 days into a genocide, and Israel still plays.”

[dhn 🌧️🌼 @arman_dhani]

Ibu jilbab pink yang berkata kasar bikin kamu ga nyaman? Good. Because there are ibu with soft-spoken words protesting in front of the presidential palace every Thursday since 2007, and you don’t give a damn. You don’t care about polite language. You just don’t give a shit.

[ms. yapping @parkcellyeol]

tp ibu ini yg sangat sopan jg ga pernah didenger☺️

[Kementerian Kegelapan @kemgelapan]

Kami dari Kementerian Kegelapan, menghimbau masyarakat agar SEMAKIN YAKIN untuk tidak memberikan jalan ke pejabat negara watwutwatwuttatotatot

Karena, mau mereka sampainya tepat waktu atau terlambat 5 hari, hasilnya akan sama saja.

[Ario Bimo Utomo @ariomazda]

Pernah gak sih, statement ini diarahin ke pejabat publik?

"Pejabat itu karyawan rakyat. Kalau mau kaya, jangan jadi pejabat," gitu misalnya.

Tanpa digaslight gak boleh kaya pun, guru sudah bingung ngatur biaya hidup. Mbok ya negur itu ke yang kaya-kaya beneran.

[✊️ @MamatAlkatiri]

MUNDUR DARI JABATAN ANDA, TANGGUNG JAWAB ! SUDAH TERLALU BANYAK NYAWA MELAYANG KARENA ULAH ANGGOTA ANDA

[Asian Financial Forum @AFF_HK]

Inflationary pressures, demographic shifts and changing consumption preference are emerging across sectors and geographies, making strategies and drivers for asset allocation increasingly crucial in the minds of asset owners and managers.

Vincent Mortier, Group Chief Investment Officer at @Amundi_ENG remarked that asset managers must be flexible in mobilising savings to support long-term economic development at AFF2025.

How can asset managers effectively contribute to a more resilient, sustainable economy? What strategies do you see as most impactful in directing capital toward growth?

Stay tuned for updates and event details of AFF2026 which will take place on 26-27 January in Hong Kong: https://t.co/oGFF1nRzDz

[Dani Rahmawan @d_rahm]

@patragumala kirain sepintas pakai kaos pemuda pancasila bang pat 😅

[sabo @plisitin]

bagus tapi sayangnya orang jawa barat jarang ada yang tau ran, soalnya kalo ada nanti dikirim ke barak

[Dani Rahmawan @d_rahm]

@_BangFu udah aman kan ya ? kalau mau, habisin sekarang aja hey @ManUtd jatah tololnya sampai akhir musin, biar musim depan seriusan dikit.