The feasibility of artificial consciousness through the lens of biology
We raise three arguments (neural complexity, Umwelt & 'skin in the game') to suggest that AI systems are not conscious and will not be in the near future.
w @mattlark@jmacshine
https://t.co/xzw0XL80S7
@matthew_d_green@FutureTomorrow_ @LastCallCNBC @LynAldenContact@GLJ_Research@GordonJohnson19 All agreed.
Tesla needs a no-BS visionary CEO. Run a contest and they'll find one. The megalomania is deafening.
Car alternatives will appear, but charging is indeed a huge gap. Nothing comes close to SC, so why do this? (Thanks, tho) https://t.co/ByT1UtBqNy
This is a really good explanation of and reminder about ChatGPT. The deep want of people (even my smart friends) to believe it is doing more is so disconcerting. There is no miracle. A new, rather tricky, tool, yes, but we're still going to have to get through life on our own.
@coinage_media@CaitlinLong_@elonmusk He was forced by circumstance into PayPal.
But Twitter as a payments platform will be mildly successful at best.
The reason? He can't not have control as evidenced by the OpenAI nonsense (if Tesla were to achieve FSD it would effectively be human-like AI).
If you're starting a reading group on Large Language Models (LLMs), what is one research paper you will want added to the reading list?
Researchers: Feel free to recommend your own paper too!
@MelMitchell1@perplexity_ai https://t.co/LqZhVYRznx
You have people like this who think AI today could have passed the Turing test in 30 years ago;
Meanwhile, actual cognitive scientists are exhausted from sighing.
WHAT a goalpost move
if you went back to 1992 and showed somebody this goalpost move they'd be like "AI just passed the Turing Test didn't it" and I'd be like "no he's trying to get ahead of the goalpostmoving curve"