@eglyman Same pattern in physical operations. The tools that are getting adopted are those that disappear into the workflow. Invisible by design isn't a philosophy. It's the adoption bar.
@auren And almost none of that market cap reflects the physical world yet. Every dollar of Nvidia's value depends on someone eventually deploying that compute into operations where atoms still move.
Process Power: From the operator seat is the Gateway Power.
Deployments are rarely won on capability alone. A technically inferior robot with responsive field service, clean install, and support that answers at 2am beats a better robot with weaker GTM.
Cornered Resource (Data), Switching Costs, Network Effects, and Branding all activate after you're deployed. Process Power is what gets you there.
Japan just set a target: 30% of the global physical AI market by 2040.
The driver isn't efficiency. It's survival.
Physical AI is being bought as a continuity tool. How do you keep factories, warehouses, and service operations running with fewer people?
The US doesn't face the same demographic cliff. But the labor economics in blue-collar ops are running the same direction. The difference is American operators are choosing this, not being forced into it.
The choice is both the opportunity and the delay.
https://t.co/lc1k90v1kV
@packyM The Industrial Revolution parallel holds best when you look at who it left behind the first time. The industries that didn't get wired in 1900 had to wait decades.
The physical operations running without real digitization today are in the same position, they're next.
@buchan_sm The hard part was clearly the workflow design, what does every employee actually need to do with AI, and how do you make that zero-friction. Coding was the easy part
@Codie_Sanchez The PE moving downmarket concern cuts both ways. More competition at the entry point, but also more sellers who've heard of PE for the first time and are now open to a conversation they wouldn't have had 5 years ago. Deal flow is up even if multiples are.
Everyone's racing to automate white collar work. Meanwhile the biggest bottleneck in the US economy is a shortage of people who know how to do things with their hands.
The most valuable skill in 2030 will be operating a robot, not prompting one.
@JasonrShuman Form factor should follow workflow, not the other way around. The question isn't 'can a humanoid do this job', it's 'what does the physical environment actually constrain, and what's the cheapest robot that fits inside those constraints.'
@Samirkaji The durability question is almost never about the model. It's about whether the wedge creates lock-in that survives the next model release. Most don't. The ones that do are usually embedded in an operation, not sitting on top of it.
@Codie_Sanchez The shortage isn't just trades AI companies are dependent on. It's every skilled trade that touches physical infrastructure. AI is the thing accelerating demand for the workers least likely to be replaced by AI.
@eglyman The pattern here maps directly to physical operations too. Best-in-class operators aren't just buying robots they're building the 15 minutes of workflow on either side of it. That's where the moat is.
@vedantnair__ The site visit problem is real. Half of what we do before any deployment is just translating. What the operator calls a 'line' and what the robot needs to know about it are completely different things. The tech isn't the bottleneck; the handoff typically is.
@claudeai And not just for software teams. The same pattern applies to any operation with structured data and a downstream action. Most of the value in field ops is sitting in the gap between 'something happened' and 'someone knew to act on it.'