Male friendship was irrevocably ruined with the normalization of "homosexuality" as a personal identity rather than an incidental fetishistic behavior. Great Men of history would not recognize what we call "friendship" as true friendship.
I have probably only ever had two or three real male friends in my life, and it's because we grew to know each other on a level that most people will never know us. True friendship is intimate on a level that would be called "gay romance" by normalfag slaves today.
(this, btw, is also why shipping/fanfic content has gone absolutely crazy in the past decade, people are absolutely mindraped and don't know what real friendship even looks like so when they see a depiction of it they mistake it for romantic love)
>Control: 2 games, swapped protagonist between those games, protagonists are siblings. Is also not decades long franchise.
>God of War: 5 mainline titles and 9 titles total, all of them starring Kratos. Swaps him out for his dead wife who played her part already.
>These are the same.
These arguments are completely disingenuous and lacking any sort of nuance or understanding of long running narratives.
Stop calling people grifters if you don’t want to be shown the mirror.
"Scientists": We think it's fine to unleash a bioweapon on the population because of our politics
People: ::people respond angrily and with venom::
"Scientists": Oh noes, teh backlash
Me: A real backlash would involve ropes, stakes, honey, and an anthill. Keep going like this and see how long it takes to get there.
Remember when four black “teens” captured, abducted, and tortured a white kid in 2017?
They livestreamed themselves torturing him, even partially scalping him. They were cracking up laughing as they did it
Naturally the media hushed that up fast
Three of them got a few years in prison. One got off with just probation and community service. No real punishment, much less justice, was delivered
Liberals will ask, "Why can't you just enjoy it?" at the same time other Liberals post, "Everything I do in life is with the intention of making you miserable".
People are not angry because they can't enjoy things. They are angry because they correctly understand that the things they once loved are being converted into weapons for an ideology that hates them.
There is a very obvious sadistic side to Progressivism's hijacking of things like movies and video games. These people do not love the media they're destroying. They're not trying to make something good. They just want revenge against the normal world.
They want the actual fans to feel alienated and dispossessed. That's the entire point.
And every so often, someone is bold enough to admit it.
Women will get themselves impregnated by a piece of human garbage because he excited her at the moment, and then blame men as a collective for their own bad decision.
@AndrewHWestern Im old enough to remember when saying saying all lives matter was the height of far right racism.
Fuck you, we dont forget you communist piece of shit lol
Cuanta ciencia hay en 4 segundos de Ester Expósito📝⬇️
El periodista le dice que acaparó todas las miradas y no puede evitar soltar esa sonrisita de chulería.
Por eso hacen cola para que el famoso con pasta las sехuаlicе y las ponga a menear el сulo, porque tiene la validación que quería y la dopamina de sentirse el centro del mundo.
Por ello a ti, chaval pobre y corriente, no te toleran ni medio micromachismo, porque no le das el suficiente beneficio por dejarse cosificar así.
Enough is enough - a deep line needs to be drawn in the sand. Talk is weak. Britain needs to say no more, and mean it.
A Restore Britain Government, with the British people's approval, would put Vickrum Digwa to death.
Henry Nowak was stabbed by Digwa five times, including twice in the back of his legs, once in the face and a fatal wound to the chest.
Rather than calling an ambulance, Digwa filmed Henry.
Digwa gave the knife to his mother and it was found by police at their home along with more than 20 other weapons.
Keeping this savage alive serves nobody.
The police officers on the scene who allowed Henry to die will face criminal charges for gross negligence manslaughter.
Digwa's foreign family will be deported.
Laws will change, the country will change, everything will change.
Order will be restored, the law will be restored.
Britain will be restored.
There is a viral trend on X right now about women who are still in contact with their "ex rapist". One with 19M views and counting, the other with 16M views.
The reason why it's blowing up so much is that this dynamic is not only real, but it's common among women's relationship fantasies. Oftentimes, they accuse their ex, who broke up with them, of SA, but still maintain contact because they can't get over him.
Other times, she was legitimately assaulted, and yet still maintained or initiated intimate relationships with the assaulter. Women are mentally malleable due to their higher "agreeableness" allowing them to even reframe past traumas as something "fun". Other times, it was just a consensual encounter that she mentally reframed as rape to garner sympathy.
Up to 60% of women have rape and forced sex fantasies that are framed in an erotic context rather than purely traumatic. This dynamic is central to many women's romance novels with forced seduction tropes.
In essence, toxic women can gaslight themselves to reframe past incidents and experiences to fit their needs at the time... whether it comes to custody battles, court cases, or regret situations. Victim status garners clout and sympathy, incentivising women to not only lie to other people but also believe in the lie themselves.
False allegations themselves have an extremely low risk of actual legal pushback, where over 99% of them go unpunished.
This is why so many men have encountered women like this, because in the current hypercharged social media world, clout incentives become more addictive than illicit drugs.
You're demanding that men sacrifice their health and happiness for the benefit of a society that shows open contempt for them and their issues and offers no rewards for doing so.
What's been happening over the last four years or so is that the Left's long-standing assumption that history was on their side is cracking, and as those cracks widen, the entire Progressive project is being openly mocked.
The Right is beginning to contest the metaphysical claims underlying Progressivism itself, rather than just meekly accepting the premise while dragging their feet about it.
But that kind of just begs the question. If the backlash against Progressivism is an inherently metaphysical rejection of the entire proposition itself, then what sort of order replaces it?
I think we're starting to enter an era where the biggest political questions are going to be things like "What is the good life?" or "How does society promote virtue?" These won't be publicly asked, of course, but they will implicitly lie behind everything that's to come.
If the Right is ever to stop society's seemingly endless march off a cliff at the hands of Progressivism, it must rediscover the ability to contest metaphysical claims rather than merely appeal to individualistic, utilitarian, or procedural arguments against the Left.
We've been doing the latter for decades, and it never works because each angle basically just concedes all the essential points of Progressivism right from the start.
Those days are over, and anyone who doesn't understand that isn't going to make it.
You can always tell with these stupid e-girls that being on the Right was always just a branding gimmick for them because the moment they denounce it (and they always do), they can never articulate what makes something "Right-wing" or why anyone would ever identify with a movement they themselves claimed to be a part of until 5 minutes ago.