@Cryptocito@coinbureau@sunnya97@jack_zampolin I also have the same concerns like Mr.Coin Bureau because with every function Atom Devs introduce new coin so, Atom damand is never gonna go through the roof + the inflation rate is too high
It's like the Devs are not even very much interested in the value increase of Atom
@jack_zampolin@Cryptocito Just watched the video of Coin Bureau - Improve your coin utility.
Whenever you add a new function you add a new coin for it so,the demand for Atom is not going up even with so many developments.
Atom is already so much inflationary that you are already making money from there.
@p0ntificator @OsmosisDoge @Cryptocito@cosmos@wosmongton Brother argument and change in brand name is hugely different.
Anyone can find thousands of content if they search Cosmos ,but if the name is changed then it will be a total different story.
Brand name has a psychological effect in our brains
@OsmosisDoge @Cryptocito@cosmos@wosmongton What is wrong with Cosmos developers ?
Why they want to change the brand name , Cosmos is going towards$10-15 if they continue to play this useless name games. Even last time also the community showed that we are not interested in changing name from EVmos to EVM.
Tokens of Near (NEAR) and Cosmos (ATOM) were among the only gainers among major cryptocurrencies in the past 24 hours as the broader market extended its slide.
By @shauryamalwa https://t.co/D7Jd0CC30n
@cosmos 260k to 300 k was really fast. It shows that people are really getting interested in Cosmos. Keep up the good work. And If possible launch EVMOS on due time (20/01/2022)