Nigel Bakker

I took the RED 💊. No going back!

[Russia news | 🇷🇺 الموجز الروسي @mog_russ]

"لماذا يكره الغرب روسيا كدولة وشعب؟"

خطاب جيفري ساكس أمام البرلمان الأوروبي:

"لماذا بدأ البريطانيون يكرهون الروس؟ لماذا؟ سأخبركم، لأنني نشرت أمس كتاباً عن ظاهرة الخوف من روسيا في أوروبا.

في الفصل الأول من هذا الكتاب، أتحدث عن دراسة رائعة أجراها مؤرخ يُدعى غليسون عام 1950.

طرح هذا المؤرخ سؤالًا بالغ الأهمية، ولا يزال ينطبق تمامًا على واقعنا اليوم.

قال إن بريطانيا وروسيا كانتا حليفتين في معركة واترلو عام 1815، لكنهما أصبحتا عدوّتين بعد 25 عامًا. ماذا حدث؟ بدأ بدراسة سجلات مناقشات البرلمان، وفحص كل الوثائق العلنية، وقرأ كل شيء، بما في ذلك كل ما قيل في مجلس العموم وكل خطاب أُلقي هناك.

وكان استنتاجه في هذا الكتاب الرائع أن أكبر جريمة ارتكبتها روسيا هي أن مساحتها تبلغ 17 مليون كيلومتر مربع. تلك كانت أكبر جرائمها!

لماذا؟ لأن بريطانيا اعتبرت أن روسيا، بحجمها الهائل الذي يبلغ 17 مليون كيلومتر مربع، تشكل تهديدًا للحكم البريطاني في الهند. وبالمناسبة، لم يخطر هذا الأمر قط ببال القيصر الروسي. لكن بريطانيا أخذت تؤجج مخاوفها وتثير قلقها إلى حد كبير، وبحلول عام 1840 أصبحت روسيا عدوًا لها.

وفي عام 1853، أشعل بالمرستون، ذلك الإمبريالي النموذجي، حربًا في شبه جزيرة القرم. لماذا؟ القصة طويلة، لكن الأمر كان يتعلق أساسًا بسحق روسيا.

ففي عام 1852، قالت روسيا إن بإمكاننا تسوية جميع الخلافات، ولا يوجد أي سبب لاندلاع صراع. لكن بالمرستون قال: سنزحف نحو سيفاستوبول. وكان السبب ببساطة أنه أراد تحويل روسيا إلى قوة هامشية لا يُعتد بها، حتى لا تتمكن من غزو الإمبراطورية البريطانية.

وهكذا اندلعت حرب القرم الدموية التي استمرت ثلاث سنوات.

هذه هي طريقتنا الثورية في صنع السلام!

كما تعلمون، بعد أيام قليلة من استسلام ألمانيا عام 1945، سأل تشرشل هيئة أركانه الحربية: لماذا لا نغزو الاتحاد السوفيتي الآن؟ وأُطلق على الخطة اسم 'عملية المستحيل / لا يمكن تصورها' (Operation Unthinkable)، قبل التخلي عنها بعدما تبيّن أنها غير قابلة للتنفيذ.

وعندما تسلّمت الولايات المتحدة قيادة الإمبراطورية البريطانية عام 1945، أصبحت روسيا عدوًا للولايات المتحدة الأمريكية.

وعندما تفكك الاتحاد السوفيتي، كانت الفرصة متاحة أمامنا، لو أردنا استغلالها، لإرساء السلام طوال القرن التالي. فقد سئم الروس بالفعل 75 عامًا من البلشفية، وكانوا يريدون السلام والتعاون والصداقة.

لكن كل ما استطاع الاستراتيجيون الأمريكيون التفكير فيه هو أن روسيا دولة شاسعة، وأن علينا ضمان بقائها قوة من الدرجة الثالثة.

لذلك تقرر تطويق روسيا بحلف الناتو. وإذا واصلت اتباع هذا النهج مدة كافية، فستكون النتيجة في نهاية المطاف حرب أوكرانيا.

هذه ليست حرب بوتين، بل حربنا نحن. والأسباب هي نفسها تمامًا التي دفعت بالمرستون ونابليون الثالث إلى إشعال حرب القرم الأولى.

ذلك أن روسيا لم يكن لديها أدنى اهتمام بالتقدم نحو أوروبا. لم يكن هذا هدفها قط، باستثناء المرات التي جاء فيها نابليون لإزعاجها، ثم عندما جاء هتلر لمهاجمتها."

[Nigel Bakker @dasculler]

@AboutPediatrics Would be a very short audit once you control for comorbidities.. Would be no one left to audit 🤷

[hmic651526611 @hmic6515266112]

@DeAngelisCorey

[Nick Hudson @NickHudsonCT]

The European crisis is the end game for the failed experiment of large government, the welfare state, centralisation and socialism. The migration crisis and its attendant propaganda is being deployed to cover up for that. The article below is poignant.

Those who believe that the banksters who would have us subjected to more centralisation—at the level of a world technosurveillance government—have lost their minds, probably as a result of the deliberate menticide those same banksters have been intent upon.

It is crucial to remember that the architects of the socialist trajectory we have suffered for the last 130 years were those same banksters. https://t.co/8eLFBvTZK9

[Mark 🇿🇦 @markmywords]

@terblans79249 Who wasn't? The whole political establishment was filling their fat bellies on the COVID scam.

[Mark 🇿🇦 @markmywords]

Should ministers face consequences when courts rule their decisions unconstitutional? 🔁 Repost if YES ❤️ Like if you think it's time we stopped letting it slide. Follow for straight talk on SA politics before 4 November 🇿🇦

[Nigel Bakker @dasculler]

@Mindsparkx__ 28

[June Slater @juneslater17]

♦️WHITE PRIVILEGE♦️

This is how our cotton mills and wool mills made their profits, which afforded them their fine stone-built mansions on the outskirts of mill towns.

It was dangerous work, fingers were often lost, eye injuries common, no comfort breaks, no health insurance and no factory nurse.

This work was done on empty bellies after a walk to work. Malnutrition was common place and discipline hard. A water barrel with a wooden ladle for dry dusty days as cotton dander filled the choking air.

There were no holidays to look forward to, no sick pay, and kids as young as 7 sent to work in the miserable conditions their parents stomached for a lifetime.

They didn't play much, they were too knackered for that. A cold hard bed was all they could hope for. Arthritis and joint pains kicked in early as crippled fingers in their middle years struggled with looms.

And our MPs talk about reparations for slavery, when every God damned nation was using slaves.

White privilege... you disgust me. There should be a plaque of remembrance dedicated to the entire working class!
#DawnButlerMP

[Wilkie (Richard Wilkinson) @WilkieisBack66]

Can someone explain this to me?

Europeans settled the Cape of Good Hope in 1652.
Their descendants have been born there for more than 350 years, built a distinct language and culture on African soil, and know no other home.

They are still routinely called colonisers and told they are not African.

Move from Lahore, Lagos or Kingston to Britain, acquire a passport, and the same voices insist you are British at once and, increasingly, that your children may claim to be English.

Either continuous presence, birth and cultural formation create a legitimate claim to a place, or they do not.

The standard cannot be inverted solely according to the ancestry of the people involved.

Jews maintained a continuous presence in the Land of Israel for over 3,000 years.
The Romans renamed the province of Judea “Syria Palaestina” after crushing the Bar Kokhba revolt in 135 CE specifically to erase the Jewish connection to the land.

Arab forces conquered the region in the 7th century. Significant Arab migration continued into the late Ottoman period and under the British Mandate, drawn by economic opportunities created in part by Jewish development.

A distinct “Palestinian” national identity among local Arabs is a 20th-century development, solidifying mainly in the 1920s in opposition to Zionism and later consolidated by the PLO and the Soviet KGB.

Afrikaners after 350+ years in South Africa: still colonisers, not African.

Jews returning to (or remaining in) their ancestral homeland after millennia: colonisers and settlers.

Arabs whose ancestors arrived via 7th-century conquest or later migration: indigenous Palestinians with an ancient claim.

Someone who arrived in Britain from the Subcontinent or Africa in recent decades: British, and now eligible to be English.

The standard for belonging keeps changing depending on who is making the claim.

#DoubleStandardIdentity #350YearsStillColoniser #JewsNeverLeft, #BelongingIsSelective

#WhoseHomeCounts
#IndigeneityWhenConvenient

#StopTheBoats #NetMigrationCrisis #EnglishIsAncestry #IntegrationFailed #BelongingIsSelective.

[Valerie Anne Smith @ValerieAnne1970]

FIRE YOUR DOCTOR IF THEY TELL YOU THIS ABOUT THE SUN!

Dr. Adiel Tel-Oren: “If ANY doctor EVER tells you to stay out of the sun… FIRE THEM IMMEDIATELY!”

The sun is CRUCIAL for our health — not the enemy.

The sun does NOT create melanoma. It PROTECTS us from it.

Over 90% of melanoma occurs on parts of the body NEVER exposed to sunlight.
The small percentage on the face? Mostly on people who slather on chemical SPF daily — blocking the very melanin that protects the skin.

This is medical malpractice dressed up as “safety.”

Chemical sunscreens are toxic poison:
- They absorb into your bloodstream at 14x the FDA safety limit after just ONE day.
- Oxybenzone: Endocrine disruptor that tanks testosterone and drives breast cancer + endometriosis.
- Octocrylene: Contaminated with the carcinogen benzophenone.
- Avobenzone: Blocks testosterone and disrupts hormones.

Meanwhile, industrial seed oils (the real villain) have exploded 328% in our diets since the 1940s. They oxidize your skin from the inside out and set the stage for cancer. The sun gets blamed while Big Food & Big Pharma profit.

Every cell in your body communicates through light.
Blocking UVB with sunscreen sabotages:
- Natural Vitamin D
- Melanin & cholesterol synergy (your skin’s cancer shield)
- Hormones, mood, immunity, bone health & more

Solution:
Get daily safe sun exposure.
For long exposure, use grass-fed beef tallow or coconut oil + non-nano zinc oxide.

Do NOT trust doctors who fear the sun.

The sun is medicine.
Chemical sunscreen is a scam.
Seed oils are destroying you from within.

Embrace the sun. Ditch the poison. Fire the fear-mongers.

Your health depends on it.

[Race 🕊️ @multiplanet1]

In 2013, Elon Musk published a 58 page technical paper describing a new transportation system called the Hyperloop: a pod traveling through a low pressure tube at 700 miles per hour, connecting Los Angeles to San Francisco in 30 minutes. The paper included engineering specifications, cost estimates, route planning, and aerodynamic calculations. Then he released it. For free. No patent. No company. No ownership claim. He gave it to the world and told anyone who wanted to build it to go ahead.

The decision baffled the business world. A detailed engineering blueprint for a potentially revolutionary transportation system, produced at significant cost in engineering time, was published as open source. Any company, any government, any university could take the design and build it without paying Elon a dollar. The intellectual property was handed over voluntarily.

He explained the decision with a logic that sounds insane until you understand how he thinks: he was too busy with SpaceX and Tesla to build the Hyperloop himself, but the concept was too important to sit unrealized in a filing cabinet. The choice was between: (1) patent it, build a company around it in 10 years when he had bandwidth, and delay the technology by a decade, or (2) release it now and let the world build it faster than he could alone. He chose speed over ownership.

The paper inspired the creation of multiple companies (Virgin Hyperloop, Hyperloop Transportation Technologies) and student competitions at universities worldwide. The concept is now being developed across multiple countries. None of the companies pay Elon. None of them are required to credit him. The idea that he spent millions developing is being built by strangers who owe him nothing.

The decision reveals a hierarchy of values that most executives cannot comprehend: speed of civilization's advancement ranks above personal ownership of the advancement. He would rather the world have the technology sooner than he have the revenue from it later. The calculation prioritizes the species over the individual. It is the same calculation that drives SpaceX's open approach to rocket data. The mission outranks the profit.

A man gave away a billion dollar idea because he didn't have time to build it and the world needed it sooner than his schedule allowed. The paper is still free. The concept is being built. The person who designed it gets nothing. He considers this the correct outcome.

[Voices of WW2 @VoicesofWW2]

In 1941, a Spaniard walked into the British embassy in Madrid and offered to spy on the Nazis.

The British turned him down.

So he went to the Germans instead, pretended to be a loyal fascist, and got hired as a German spy. His plan was to lie to them for the rest of the war.

It worked better than anyone could have imagined.

His name was Juan Pujol García. Before the war he had tried his hand at running a chicken farm and a movie theater. He had no spy training. What he had was a deep hatred of both fascism and communism after the Spanish Civil War, and an incredible imagination.

The Germans gave him a codename, invisible ink, money, and orders to go to Britain and recruit spies.

He didn't go to Britain.

He went to Lisbon, Portugal, and made everything up.

Using a tourist guidebook, maps, magazines, newsreels, and a British railway timetable from the library, he wrote long, detailed reports about life in England. Military movements. Morale. Ports.

He'd never been there. He made mistakes. He didn't understand British money. He once reported that dockworkers in Glasgow would do anything for a liter of wine.

The Germans loved him anyway.

Then British codebreakers reading German messages noticed something strange. The Germans were hunting for a convoy that didn't exist, based on a report from some agent in Britain they'd never heard of.

The British went looking for this mystery spy. They found Pujol. In 1942 they finally took him on and brought him to London.

Now he had real help. MI5 gave him the codename Garbo, after the actress, because they thought he was the greatest actor in the world.

Together with his British handler, Pujol built a fake spy network for the Germans. It eventually had 27 imaginary agents. Each had a name, a personality, a job, and a backstory. A Welsh nationalist. A Venezuelan student. A Greek sailor. Some of them recruited their own imaginary sub-agents.

When they needed to explain why one agent had gone quiet, they killed him off. They even put a fake obituary in a Liverpool newspaper. The Germans reportedly paid a pension to his widow.

Who also didn't exist.

Then came D-Day.

Hours before the landings, the British let Pujol send a message warning the Germans that the invasion was coming in Normandy. It was timed so it would arrive too late to matter, but it made him look brilliant.

Three days later he sent the most important message of his career. Normandy was a trick, he said. The real invasion was still coming, at Calais, led by a huge army under General Patton.

That army was fake too. But the Germans believed him.

German forces that could have been rushed to Normandy were held back near Calais for weeks, waiting for an attack that never came.

The Germans were so grateful they awarded him the Iron Cross.

A few months later, King George VI made him a Member of the Order of the British Empire.

He's one of the only people known to have been decorated by both sides of the war.

After the war, afraid of revenge from surviving Nazis, he faked his own death from malaria in Africa and disappeared to Venezuela, where he lived quietly running a shop.

For decades the world thought he was dead.

In 1984, a British writer tracked him down. Pujol came back to Normandy for the 40th anniversary of D-Day and met veterans who had landed on the beaches.

Some of them thanked him.

[Carnivore Aurelius ©🥩 ☀️🦙 @AlpacaAurelius]

we seriously

wake kids up at 7am and mess with their circadian

send them to a school where theyre fed pizza

force them to sit down for 7 hours under toxic blue lighting

and if they dont enjoy it we medicate them with legal meth

why the f are we doing this to kids?

[Sama Hoole @SamaHoole]

A Nobel Prize-winning chemist fed cows no protein at all for years, and they gave milk, and the milk was full of protein.

Artturi Virtanen won his Nobel for chemistry in 1945.

In the 1960s he took dairy cows off every protein in their diet and fed them urea and ammonium salts, which are nitrogen and nothing else, with cellulose and starch for energy.

The cows made milk. Full milk, with every essential amino acid in it, for years, through several lactations.

The microbes in the rumen took the nitrogen and built the protein from scratch, and the cow digested the microbes.

They built every B vitamin as well, including B12, which no plant and no animal can make and which comes, in the end, from a microbe or nowhere.

A cow is the only farm animal that manufactures protein. A pig and a chicken can only move protein from one place to another, and the place is usually a soy field.

Feed a pig a kilo of soy protein and you get less than a kilo of pork. Feed a cow grass with no protein worth the name and you get a kilo of beef and milk anyway.

Grazing cattle produce more protein a human can eat than they consume.

A cow is a protein factory with a grass intake and a chemist-proof design, and she can run it on nitrogen and sunlight.

Every plant-based plan to replace her begins with growing the protein first.

[Mike, Mike, Mike @Gulicio1]

This is the best explanation between left and right I have heard in a long time! #RepublicanValues #democraticvalues

[Heather Cofer @HeatherACofer]

The mindset behind this post is both disingenuous and dangerous for women.

- It’s disingenuous, because that “work” block behind the man includes many elements that could be divided into responsibilities that I, for one, am incredibly grateful I don’t have to carry. I have said *so* many times that the load my husband carries at work (and carries with excellence) is beyond what I can fathom.

- It’s also disingenuous, because he works due to his responsibility toward his family. That’s part of the weight he shoulders.

- It’s dangerous, because women are being taught to think about their family as a burden. As something that drags you down. As something that zaps the life from you rather than being a significant blessing and strength. I’ve been a wife for fifteen years and a SAHM for thirteen years. Now with eight kiddos I’ve never taken more delight in caring for them and our home than I do now.

- It’s dangerous, because it tells women they are incapable of growth through the daily mundane details of life due to our feelings about them. What can be used to mature and strengthen us is instead framed as something that inhibits us. Hard things are presented as bad things. But in reality, the hardest things are the ones that build endurance, resilience, and help us understand what God has created us to be capable of when we are willing to grow and learn under the daily tasks of life.

- It’s dangerous because it frames the work of the home as lesser-than. It makes it seem as if these are necessary evils rather than opportunities to serve and love in the most foundational ways. It also removes the agency of saying you can actually gain skills through homemaking that are really valuable: time, people, and item management, organization, culinary skills, efficiency and attention to detail, keeping cool under pressure, etc.

- It’s dangerous, because her demeanor is one of being downcast. Yes, sometimes the work feels discouraging. But it has the potential for so much joy. If we have a vision beyond today those weights are going to strengthen us in wonderful ways that are worth it in every way.

[Een ex-woke docent @EenExWokeDocent]

“De Europeanen staan op het punt om binnen zeer korte tijd wakker te worden in een verschrikkelijke nachtmerrie.

Er zijn mensen die eruitzien zoals ik, met een baard en donker haar, die zijn gevlucht voor de terreur en de islam. Ik ben bijvoorbeeld half Duits, half Egyptisch en geboren in Duitsland. Ik zie er nog steeds uit zoals zij.

Maar er zijn ook mensen die eruitzien zoals ik en die niet voor de terreur zijn gevlucht. Zij hebben de terreur en de islam juist met zich meegebracht. En om heel eerlijk te zijn, vormen zij de meerderheid. Niet andersom.

Jullie hebben werkelijk géén idee wat er onder de oppervlakte sluimert en slechts wacht tot een kritische massa is bereikt.

Als jullie liberalen niet naar een witte man willen luisteren, luister dan naar mij. Ik waarschuw jullie omdat ik weet hoe deze mensen zijn. Ik ben daar geweest. Ik heb er een jaar gewoond. Ze haten jullie.

Jullie zullen wakker worden in een verschrikkelijke nachtmerrie. Een absolute nachtmerrie.

Zodra een bepaald punt is bereikt, wat ik de kritische massa noem, onder andere door geboortecijfers en demografische ontwikkelingen, zullen jullie niet langer in staat zijn jezelf te verdedigen.

Helaas is de witte man door psychologische manipulatie gaan geloven dat mannelijkheid iets slechts is. Dat mannen zwak moeten zijn, zich vooral door hun emoties moeten laten leiden en zacht en meegaand moeten zijn.

Tegelijkertijd komen hier zeer agressieve mensen naartoe. Ze accepteren jullie cultuur niet. Ze accepteren jullie religie niet. Ze accepteren jullie vrouwenrechten niet. Ze accepteren helemaal niets van dit alles.

Ze willen het uitwissen. Ze willen jullie uitwissen.

En jullie zijn blind voor wat er gebeurt. Jullie weigeren het te zien.

Geloof me, dit wordt een nachtmerrie. Een bloedige, verschrikkelijke nachtmerrie.

Word in godsnaam wakker. Ik meen dit bloedserieus.”

[FeelGoodThoughts @feelgoodtale]

This is John Eisenman. He lost his daughter to sexual trafficking. She was sold for $1,000 in Seattle Washington. He did what a father should do and researched, investigated and found out about her abduction. He RESCUED her HIMSELF. He found out the person who sold her into trafficking was her 19 year old boyfriend. He met up with him, abducted him, bludgeoned and stabbed him to death in Nov, 2020. The authorities found him [dead AF boyfriend] in Oct 2021 in the trunk of the car he abandoned. John Eisenman sits in jail knowing his daughter is safe and growing up after he has already lived 60 years of his life. I bet you, he rests easy. Live your life to the fullest. Do your absolute best to make sure your children have the opportunity to do the same no matter what the sacrifice. I will be sending John some commissary money. I hope he gets to see freedom with his daughter one day. Does he deserve a medal 🏅?

[Sama Hoole @SamaHoole]

University debate: "Fruit and honey were the staples of the human evolutionary diet."

Nutritionist: "We're primates. Primates eat fruit. Our colour vision evolved to spot it, our sweet tooth evolved to want it, and the Hadza in Tanzania still get a sixth of their calories from honey. Sugar is ancestral."

Anthropologist: "What month is it in your ancestral forest?"

Nutritionist: "Sorry?"

Anthropologist: "Wild fruit comes in a window. A few weeks, then it's over. What's the fruit-eater doing in the other forty-five?"

Nutritionist: "Finding other fruit."

Anthropologist: "At latitude fifty, in January, forty thousand years ago, with the glacier a day's walk north. Name the orchard."

Nutritionist: "Humans evolved in Africa."

Anthropologist: "And left it. We've been in Europe and Siberia for forty-five thousand years, through an Ice Age, on nothing you'd recognise as a banana. The mammoth was the fruit."

Nutritionist: "The Hadza prove honey is a staple."

Anthropologist: "The Hadza climb thirty feet up a baobab, smoke out a hive, get stung half to death and come down with a comb full of grubs. They eat the grubs. Bee larvae are fat and protein. The honey is the wrapping, and it's a few weeks a year, on the equator."

Nutritionist: "It's still sugar, and they thrive on it."

Anthropologist: "So does a bear. He eats every berry on the mountain in September and sleeps till April. Fruit is how an animal gets fat on purpose before the food runs out. Our liver still does exactly that with fructose. You've taken a seasonal fattening switch and left it pressed down for twelve months."

Nutritionist: "Our sweet tooth is proof we were built for it."

Anthropologist: "Your sweet tooth is one receptor. You've got twenty-five for bitter, because most of what grows wants to poison you. A tongue built for fruit would be a tongue that could taste more than one of them."

Nutritionist: "What about the apple? The grape?"

Anthropologist: "The wild apple is a crab the size of a marble and tastes of battery. The wild banana is seeds held together by spite. Everything on your fruit bowl was bred in the last few thousand years to be a sweet nobody's ancestor ever met."

Moderator: "Closing statements."

Nutritionist: "Sugar from fruit is natural, ancient, and the body was designed to enjoy it."

Anthropologist: "The body was designed to enjoy it for three weeks and then go hunting. You've skipped the hunting and kept the three weeks going since 1980."

[The nutritionist had brought a banana. It stayed in the bag.]

[Sama Hoole @SamaHoole]

Buy the fat mince. The 20%. The 80/20 if you're American. Whatever diet you're on, whatever your doctor said, whatever the lean tray next to it is promising, buy the fat one, and buy it this week.

Mince is the whole cow in a tray. Brisket, chuck, shin, the fat cap off the rib, ground together so the poorest family on the street eats the same animal as the richest and pays for the bit the restaurant sent back. It built the shepherd's pie, the Bolognese, the chilli, the meatloaf, the burger and every Tuesday night of your childhood, and it did the lot with the fat left in.

Then somebody took the fat out and charged you for the labour.

The 5% arrived. The 95/5. The extra lean. It cost more, it went grey in the pan, it tasted of the tray, and a generation of mothers on both sides of the Atlantic were told it was the healthy one. The children pushed it round the plate. The jar of sauce moved in to do the job the fat had been doing for nothing.

The fat one browns. The fat one fries itself. The fat one makes a burger that needs no sauce and a Bolognese that needs no sugar, and it carries the vitamins, because they ride in the fat you've been paying extra to have removed.

So go to the shop. Walk past the lean tray with its little apology on the label. Pick up three of the fat ones. Fry them in butter, salt them, melt cheese over them, and feed them to someone you love. Then do it again on Thursday.

The fat was never the problem. The fat was the point.

Buy the 20%. Buy the 80/20. Buy it fat.