@BayesianNuance@DavidSacks Lets pause here, So you measure the strength of a market by the all time high? a momentary peak? Or the rationale here is the market should only ever climb upwards never downwards?
@Igbalodengineer@OpeBee Ope is usually solid on Analysis and even points to where his own analysis may be off. But for the US he is wearing rose tinted glasses. Sorry to burst your bubble.
@Strydizzle@akinfalayajo@toluogunlesi I second that. Lovely memories of lessons on Crowther Lane. Some folks still go by the nickname Mrs. Falayajo bestowed in class.
@katchie_a @funmilee Yeah. Let's hope the courts make clear and logically consistent decisions that are not just based on technicalities. Well reasoned judgments will allow both sides of the case an acceptable/palatable resolution. Even if not emotionally satisfying.
@katchie_a @funmilee The 25% FCT issue is now at the tribunal
"That it be determined that the 2nd Respondent having failed to score 1/4 of the votes cast at the presidential election in the FCT, was not entitled to be declared and returned as winner of the presidential election held on 25/2/ 2023"
@katchie_a @funmilee Yeah. It's also a logically coherent argument. That's why we I expect it to be tested in court and see which of the two positions is considered legally correct. Interesting parallels with the 12 2/3rd case of 1979.
@katchie_a @funmilee Yeah. It will be tested. A neutral interpretation is more likely than not to regard FCT as a 37th state in that clause. 2/3rds then becomes 25. It may sound good to claim FCT as seperate now, but doing that will create a cynical single point of failure in presidential elections.
@OhTimehin @omo_b Everyone is entitled to their opinion and beliefs. Let her words stand as stated to be judged on its own. U prob won't like a misogynist mansplaining ur words. Live and let live.