And, if you are interested in AI polling in particular, I also have you covered! This is the company substack where I am writing most of the posts: https://t.co/iRmuXHc7YD
I don't have election forecasts/predictions today (first time in my professional life!) I do have a ton of election-adjacent stuff and I'm gonna email about it once your inboxes recover mid-month: https://t.co/5wFMw5q3NZ
Allan Lichtman, who has correctly predicted all but one presidential election since 1984, delivered his final verdict on the upcoming midterm election.
https://t.co/9WXtfFcQnb
...unless a certain type of republican is responding too much and another type is not, and it's not a trait that you can measure and fix with weights
this has always been either the fear or the problem (depending on which election you're in)
Non response bias doesnโt mean the polling will miss. This just means they had to make more calls to republicans to get the responses they needed. And they weighted the poll to be Trump +7. Itโs just a lot of Kansans who voted for Trump are telling pollsters theyโre gonna vote for Hamilton
@rnishimura hmm hmm no i gotta set up an agent that takes these surveys as me, but then quits if anyone gives me an LOI over 15 mins
that is my real way to contribute to the industry
also these numbers are all pretty high/positive bc people tend to count talking about capabilities/efficiencies in daily life as positive news (something that came out of an OE follow-up!)
I will send results out on the NRG substack later this week. But when we asked which lab was doing the most on safety, the leading answer was "No AI company is working towards safety"
๐
Anthropic says that even the entire insurance industry in the aggregate will not have the capacity to insure the catastrophic risk that ANTHROPIC ITSELF poses to the world
lol
this is one of my forever beefs about 2022 fwiw
Rs had advantages, but blunted them with 1) Dobbs (something they wanted forever) and 2) bad candidates (true unforced errors there) and a small win in the house and generally worse results than they could have
but the whole story somehow revolves around how the results departed from what the conventional wisdom was according to some R-sponsored polls that dropped in october
It's weird that we all set pre-election expectations then grade the parties on it
We could just eliminate this step in mid-Nov and assess how well parties did compared to fundamentals, what tactics worked, etc
Like why do takes in mid-Oct with partial info figure into final assessments
barely related tangent
i think everyone basically wants to run against the influencers on the other side. bc influencers are obnoxious, say totally insane things, have incentive to get views not votes, etc.
sometimes the electeds/pols feel/act/talk like influencers and it all works out and makes sense.
but i think this ^^ impulse is part of why political debates can feel only semi tethered to elections sometimes
exactly! and the joke comes from the Saddam Hussein + Cheesecake Factory image juxtaposition
if Obama had said "Cheesecake Factory is UGGGGLLLYY and OMG TRUMP LIKES IT!!" it would not be funny and remind me of a lefty influencer trying to get hate clicks
I feel like this is not that hard to get?