No, we should all seek the truth.
But take Herodotus for example. There is very little if any concrete evidence to dispute much of Herodotus’ claims (excluding the very ancient Egyptian history he was relating) but Historians still do based on reasonings from other histories, evidence, logical reasoning, scanty archeological evidence etc. which is fine.
I only take issue when these are presented as fact instead of, what they are, their educated opinion.
I find far too often it is presented as “it actually happened like this” instead of “ we believe it probably occurred like ___ based on ____ evidence”
If you’re going to disregard claims of a primary source you should have concrete evidence to support your claim or present your claim for what it is, your opinion.
Of course it’s a deflection he’s apart of the administration but the treasury dept has 0 influencer on what’s going on in Iran. It has nothing to do with him and asking questions about it to the secretary of the treasury is just an obvious attack on trump and has 0 to do with him or the treasury so why wouldn’t he deflect. It’s not his purview.
@ThomBrady5 Exactly, why would you want to create a show with millions of dedicated, excited, existing fans when you could create a new adaptation of the show and possibly get…. Millions of fans…
@MedievalScholar The casting was terrible and the writing was worse. Last I checked Henry was around 30 at Agincourt not 12. Terrible movie, doesn’t really matter about his acting.
@mjarbo I will never understand the logic of buying or reviving an IP and wanting something “new.”
Then why do you need the IP? Just invent whatever the “new” is you want. Morons.
@MilGrauNews Yea I know a person that’s the reverse of this. XX but is male has male equipment, prostate ect. A lot of people with this condition only find out after having infertility issues.