Deadly Analysis

A mixture of movies reviews, conceptual analyses, and philosophy. We select well-made horror films, "dissect" them, and talk about what we find on the table.

[Deadly Analysis @deadlyanalysis]

@realDonaldTrump It's called voting, dumbass.

[Deadly Analysis @deadlyanalysis]

@realDonaldTrump Democracy is a bitch, ain't it?

[Deadly Analysis @deadlyanalysis]

@BainConnal @ScaryStuffPod @monstersndrinks @FreddLV

[Deadly Analysis @deadlyanalysis]

New video!

https://t.co/93SKqyPKgO

[Deadly Analysis @deadlyanalysis]

Season 2 is finally here as we discuss Bong Joon Ho’s film Parasite. You can also binge all our past episodes on iTunes, SoundCloud, and Spotify now!

https://t.co/jjFNpYRtWf

[Deadly Analysis @deadlyanalysis]

@AaronJankowski Starting up again next week. 🙂

[Deadly Analysis @deadlyanalysis]

@patrick_brice It's legit well deserved. Both Creep and Creep 2 are some of the most tense, cerebral, and quite frankly novel horror films that have come out in the last decade.

[Deadly Analysis @deadlyanalysis]

My understanding is that this is @jthunter13 and @ShayrahA's favorite horror film ever made.

https://t.co/wn8CzciykU

[Deadly Analysis @deadlyanalysis]

We decided to have a Royal Rumble free-for-all on our #podcast and debate which of the 64 films we've covered is the greatest #horror film of all time. Enjoy!

https://t.co/TNWXiozia9

[Deadly Analysis @deadlyanalysis]

@jthunter13 Jim's ratings = the highs are high and the lows are low.

[Deadly Analysis @deadlyanalysis]

@jthunter13 Damn that's high for you!

[Tom Savini @THETomSavini]

Goodbye Sid Haig. A great mate to hang with. An enthralling storyteller. A class act. One of a kind. An historical landmark that will missed forever.

[Kierkegaardians of the Galaxy @SisyphusRedemed]

In which I talk about the existential (and yes, Proustian) elements of "IT (Part 2)".

My @deadlyanalysis 2-minute review of #AndyMuschietti's adaptation of the second half of @StephenKing's novel.

https://t.co/M1WsOL5aPU

[Deadly Analysis @deadlyanalysis]

@jthunter13

[Deadly Analysis @deadlyanalysis]

@aliamjadrizvi @CliftonsNotes

[Deadly Analysis @deadlyanalysis]

@aliamjadrizvi @CliftonsNotes Your problem seems to be an unhealthy devotion to the empirical for judging weather or not a system of inquiry is useful or worthwhile. Mathematical inquiry is not empirical. Aesthetic judgments (i.e. "that's beautiful music") are not empirical.

[Deadly Analysis @deadlyanalysis]

@aliamjadrizvi @CliftonsNotes To show you how silly this is:

[Deadly Analysis @deadlyanalysis]

@aliamjadrizvi @CliftonsNotes How THE HELL can you make statements of metaphysics without requiring the use of formal logic (i.e. the use of propositions or statements to determine the validity or invalidity of a conclusion)?

Give me an example of a metaphysical statement that doesn't rely on formal logic?