@MarkQuarless@wholemars I wonder if this is a network effect? The more you build the more the network grows and the more valuable it is to be part of the network.
Its counter intuitive but all the best system dynamics are this way.
@wholemars It is probable that the aid would have an effect.
There would be an incremental price increase but not proportional since 1st time home buyers are only a fraction of home buyers.
@stevenmarkryan This is a classic example of fundamental attribution error.
Testosterone does not exist in isolation, it's part of a larger system. Whatever is making men have low t now will still be in effect if you dial up the amount temporarily.
You have to change the underlying system.
@BRowen99@jeremykauffman This is wrong, but 720 is actually wrong too because on the first rotation you would only have a maximum of 4 people in a full rotation because they still have to enter.
@Ar3s440390 Thank you for telling me that. Do you mind sharing the sources that led to this understanding of yours? I don't mean to question your authority in any way, I would merely enjoy verifying it myself if you don't mind.
@jonfromIA I stand by that statement 100%. Luna was obviously built on a terrible foundation and the idea that a burn and mint algorithm would be definitively secure enough long term was clearly wrong, but Luna was most akin to a tesla like organization of all crypto projects at the time.
Sandclock (@SandclockOrg) is the most ridiculously undervalued project in the entire crypto space. You have next level UI/UX and the financial wiz of a quant fund working with a clear-headed systematic approach to bring us a revolutionary experience.