Delphie Bell

[Delphie Bell @delphiebell]

@anishmoonka What if it's just correlation between times of plenty and times of hardship/famine?

[Delphie Bell @delphiebell]

@Anthony94258331 @cremieuxrecueil Not necessarily all due to risk seeking. Poorer = older, less well maintained cars. Need to control for that and any other confounders.

[Delphie Bell @delphiebell]

@ukhpinfo Is that net? It doesn't seem possible

[Delphie Bell @delphiebell]

@cremieuxrecueil This seems to be based on the rather massive assumption that world emissions of CO2 will start dropping soon, and will eventually be zero. Source for projected emissions data?

[Delphie Bell @delphiebell]

@fw_naetoblaq Not sure it means exactly the same thing, but in the UK we use the term 'duvet day' - to mean taking a day off work just to stay in bed, even though you're not ill.

[Delphie Bell @delphiebell]

@diaper @AlSultan_Meriam I believe it. I seem to remember him posting about battling cancer. Pretty sure he must have sold his handle, as its content changed and replies became bot-like.

[Delphie Bell @delphiebell]

@carloslogging70 @karatademada I'm pretty sure the original account owner must have sold on his handle. I remember him saying he was battling cancer. Think it's been run by a bot for a while now

[Delphie Bell @delphiebell]

@CreeCoder Massimo (Rainmaker1973) used to be a great account, run by an obviously real person, not a bot. I think the original poster must have sold the handle on. I remember him talking about battling cancer. I got blocked when I asked if it was run by a bot now.

[Delphie Bell @delphiebell]

@TheStalwart Looking at the reduction in January, that does imply lower amounts bought since will have evened out the excess bought in Dec by now

[Delphie Bell @delphiebell]

@Romy_Holland Yeah... but.... you must have a 'good' baby though. Plenty are going to be fretting and grizzly most of the time. Not fun to travel with.

[Delphie Bell @delphiebell]

@BodilUK My son's year (he's 19 now) we're all pushed to take a language at GCSE so they could get a baccalaureate.
Never mentioned again once choices were made

[Delphie Bell @delphiebell]

@ThrillaRilla369 Have you been shit posting again?

[Delphie Bell @delphiebell]

@arcpresentation I find I don't mind AI being used like this, when it's intention is to be informative, rather than misleading

[Delphie Bell @delphiebell]

@vintagemapstore Using the median against time is very misleading. We are just watching the largest cohort age. So what? Population pyramids far more informative.

[Delphie Bell @delphiebell]

@royllovians I doubt this is true for many societies, especially places like India, whose Caste system is believed to go back 3000 years

[Delphie Bell @delphiebell]

@Globalstats11 Where does all NZs excess dairy go?! Do they export a lot of cheese?

[Delphie Bell @delphiebell]

@DanNeidle Do companies house use ISO27001 standards, which required audit logs of all write changes? If so should be easy enough to find company detail changes that should be investigated.

[Charles Floate 📈 @Charles_SEO]

Here's a FREE SEO Chrome extension that shows you whether Google can actually SEE your page content.. and it catches an issue I find on about 30% of the sites I audit.

Install: View Rendered Source (free Chrome extension, takes 10 seconds)

Go to any page on your site and click the extension icon.

It shows you TWO versions of your page side by side:
- LEFT: the raw HTML source code (what your server sends)
- RIGHT: the rendered DOM after all JavaScript has executed (what Google actually sees after it processes JS)

Anything highlighted in GREEN exists in the rendered version but NOT in the raw source, that means it only appears after JavaScript fires.

Why this matters: Google crawls in two waves.

- First wave = raw HTML only (fast, cheap, happens immediately).
- Second wave = JavaScript rendering (slower, more expensive, happens LATER, sometimes days or weeks later).

If your page's main content, internal links, or navigation only exist in the JavaScript-rendered version, Google might not see them during the first crawl.

Some heavy JS sites and CMSs end up ranking with HALF the content invisible to Google.

Common things I find hiding behind JavaScript:
- Entire product descriptions on eCommerce pages
- Internal navigation and mega menus
- Review sections and star ratings
- Lazy loaded content below the fold
- Tab content that requires a click to display

If you check and your raw source matches your rendered source almost perfectly? Great. Your site is fine.

If there are massive green highlighted sections? You've just found why Google isn't ranking you as well as it should, it literally can't see your content on the first pass.

100% FREE, and it answers the question "can Google actually see my page?" which is more fundamental than any onpage optimization you'll ever do...

[Delphie Bell @delphiebell]

@lisperati I wonder what this would have looked like during the peak of last ice age, when the sea level was lower, but a lot of the land was depressed by the weight of the ice

[Delphie Bell @delphiebell]

@solarise_webdev @Shitty_Future I like how succinct it was. My experience with AIs so far is that they tend to be far too chatty, unless you tell them otherwise.