@xwanyex But, this just isn’t true, at least not uniformly, and the person objecting has and will colloquially use the word “own” in contexts where the law does not permit destruction. Ownership is a fuzzy word, and while it’s offputting, it seems clear kids fall within that fuzziness.
@xwanyex I sometimes provoke a bit by saying children are property, or rather that children are owned by their parents. It all hedges on what one will allow of the definition “own.” People will generally say that, well, I can legally destroy things that own.
@PoltFan69@michaelmalice I always loosely called it snap to grid thinking
They don’t have a bucket for it so it traverses the graph to the closest thing it is like and it goes in that bucket except here it’s more meta, like the relationship between the buckets is not wired up correctly
@kimmonismus i find asking ai why it did something or even what it did to be really unreliable, because CoT or perhaps completely missing intermediate steps aren’t in the context for it to audit
That said though if the result suggests having been lazy then that seals it
@carnaldev@roulerdelaroute@Polymarket Idk to be fair the world would have actually “ended” in 2000 so to speak if coders didn’t put in a staggering number of hours to fix it
It’s both discouraging that everyone waited until the last minute and encouraging that humanity worked hard and averted it
@carnaldev@Polymarket I didn’t research it myself but ai chat says the finding reduces the security to classical attacks on post quantum by half on a specific non nist approved implementation. But it doesn’t break it. So that’s nice.