Retatrutide and reversing insulin resistance and diabetes
It’s all right here ⬇️⬇️
https://t.co/rBrfsqneLk
It’s all on this video (no you don’t even need to get the research playbook if you don’t want to, but you should)
Labs and playbook will be in my stories this evening as well
You can’t fix insulin resistance (diabetes) without fixing systemic inflammation
They’re not separate problems
Inflammation is the root
Insulin resistance is the manifestation
I’m tired of the Instaexperts and their “magic cures” based on never seeing a patient
I’m at over 1 million+ verifiable patients
I’m right…
I’m ALWAYS right
Do you know why?
I only speak on what I know
and I actually care
Run this 90 days
and I mean actually do it
and HbA1c
fasting insulin
HOMA-IR etc…
All normalize
liver fat disappears
and biology reverses insulin resistance and diabetes
You’re welcome
Share this with everyone!
Repost this everywhere!
Help people!
Never Miss
Dr Trevor Bachmeyer
The Spartan
BREAKING: U.S. hospitals in border states like Texas are now openly advertising “birth packages” up to $5,000 to foreigners in Latin America. Essentially, someone can fly in, deliver, and secure automatic U.S. citizenship for their child.
This is the direct result of the Supreme Court’s recent ruling preserving birthright citizenship for children of non-citizens.
American citizenship is being turned into a paid service.
Today, I want to share the best food for inflammation. This food is powerful for any type of inflammatory condition, autoimmune disease, or any condition that ends in “-itis.”
If you like this video, check this one out next: https://t.co/OqDQ3ga3Tq
Dr. Eric Berg, DC, not MD; information only
@ValerieAnne1970 This solar damage nonsense is unnecessary. They could have protective awnings that cover the panels when a storm begins. They’re not gonna be useful a storm anyway they should be covered. Not sure what you do about tornadoes.
Even Amazon cannot get a new submarine cable for its AI data centers before 2028. SubCom alone holds $4.7 billion in unfilled orders. That's the longest backlog in the industry's history. Every AI model trains on data stored across oceans, data that crosses the seafloor on a fiber optic cable. One component has to work without maintenance for 25 years on the ocean floor: The repeater. It amplifies light using erbium-doped fiber pumped by lasers rated for 200,000 hours of continuous operation. Repeaters sit at depths of 8,000 meters under 800 atmospheres of pressure, spaced every 70 km along cables stretching 15,000 km. A single transpacific cable contains up to 200 repeaters. Once deployed, they can't be serviced. Only 4 companies on Earth can build a complete submarine cable system.
A new "super drug" nanoparticle therapy clears toxic brain proteins and heals the blood-brain barrier, offering a potential breakthrough for neurodegenerative disease recovery.
Researchers from Spain and China have developed a groundbreaking nanoparticle treatment that effectively reverses cognitive decline by helping the brain heal itself. In a recent study involving mice, the therapy cleared toxic proteins associated with Alzheimer’s within just one hour and restored six months of lost cognitive function. Unlike traditional treatments that merely target symptoms, these nanoparticles act as a "super drug" by repairing the blood-brain barrier, which typically breaks down in the early stages of the disease, allowing damage to spread throughout the brain.
By reactivating the LRP1 protein, the treatment enables the brain to flush out waste and significantly reduce inflammation while boosting blood flow. After only three injections, the test subjects showed dramatic improvements in memory and behavior, returning to normal activity levels within months. While still in the experimental phase, this approach represents a fundamental shift in neuroscience, moving away from simple plaque dissolution toward restoring the brain’s intrinsic defensive mechanisms and long-term health.
Source: Spanish and Chinese Research Consortium. Nanoparticle-mediated LRP1 reactivation for Alzheimer's protein clearance and blood-brain barrier restoration. Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy.
Yes, this law is likely to face litigation as an unconstitutional bill of attainder. It singles out a specific, identifiable group—California residents receiving payments from the federal anti-weaponization fund—for a severe 100% tax penalty based on legislative judgment of their association with Jan. 6-related claims, without any judicial trial or individualized determination of guilt.
The US Constitution (Art. I, §10) bars states from passing bills of attainder. Courts assess whether a law targets an easily ascertainable class and serves a punitive purpose rather than legitimate regulation or revenue. Newsom’s stated intent (“We don’t fund criminals”) strengthens the punitive case.
Expect prompt challenges on this ground plus due process and equal protection. Success depends on exact statutory language and enforcement details. Affected recipients or the fund would have standing to sue.
UNUSUAL
CHINA officially surpasses the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.
Four days ago, China’s HUAWEI announced the world’s fastest supercomputer, LINESHINE, with a speed of 2.1 quintillion operations per second — that’s a 1 followed by 18 zeros.
To imagine its scale: running this machine consumes 42 megawatts, enough to power tens of thousands of homes.
What does China gain from this supercomputer?
1. It allows China to conduct virtual nuclear tests with extremely high accuracy, reducing the need for real tests — lowering costs and avoiding international restrictions.
2. It can predict natural disasters such as hurricanes and floods before they occur, helping prevent human and material losses.
3. It enables the development of advanced electronic systems that are nearly impossible to decrypt, and can also penetrate enemy systems.
4. It helps discover new materials with superior thermal conductivity, potentially revolutionizing industrial manufacturing, engine systems, satellites, and electronic devices.
5. It strengthens China’s position in artificial‑intelligence dominance, which is considered the most critical step toward global technological leadership.
In short, this supercomputer is a factory for minds.
The greater a nation’s ability to compute and simulate, the faster it moves from theory to practical application in science and technology.
🚨 Hoy ha pasado algo que casi nadie está explicando bien, y conviene que lo entiendas porque dice mucho de hacia dónde va esto.
Se ha lanzado Open USD (OUSD), una nueva stablecoin. Pero lo importante no es "otra stablecoin más"... es QUIÉN está detrás.
Más de 140 empresas que normalmente se pelean a muerte entre sí, juntas en el mismo proyecto: Visa, Mastercard, American Express, BlackRock, Google, Samsung, Stripe, Coinbase... y sí, Ripple también.
¿Y por qué se juntan todos? Aquí está la jugada, y es brillante.
Hasta ahora el negocio de las stablecoins funcionaba así: tú le das tu dinero a Circle (los de USDC), ellos emiten el token, y con TU dinero compran deuda de EEUU y se quedan ellos casi todo el rendimiento. Dinero gratis para el emisor.
OUSD le da la vuelta a la tortilla: el rendimiento se reparte entre las empresas que participan. La stablecoin deja de ser el negocio y pasa a ser solo la tubería. Un estándar compartido en vez de un emisor que se lo queda todo.
¿Y a quién le sienta esto como una patada? A Circle.
Hoy mismo sus acciones cayeron casi un 16%.
Ni Circle, ni Tether, ni PayPal están invitados a la fiesta. Normal.
Y ahora fíjate en quién dirige esto, porque lo explica TODO. El CEO de Open Standard (la empresa detrás de OUSD) es Zach Abrams, cofundador de Bridge. ¿Y qué es Bridge? La infraestructura de stablecoins que Stripe compró por 1.100 millones de dólares en 2024.
O sea: esto es, en el fondo, una jugada del ecosistema Stripe.
Por eso de entrada OUSD NO sale en todas partes. Sale nativo en Solana desde el día uno (donde Bridge ya tiene toda la fontanería montada y rodada) y en Tempo, que es la propia blockchain de pagos de Stripe.
No es casualidad ni ideología: lanzan donde el equipo fundador ya tiene la infraestructura funcionando.
¿Y las demás cadenas? Aquí te aviso, porque he visto a medios soltar alegremente "sale en Solana, Stellar, Base y Polygon".
Cuidado: eso NO lo ha confirmado Open Standard. Lo único sólido es Solana + Tempo el día uno. El resto es especulación de periodistas mirando qué cadenas están entre los socios.
No te lo creas hasta que salga la documentación técnica.
Y la cosa no estará del todo operativa hasta más adelante en 2026 — no hay fecha firme todavía.
Ahora, la pregunta que de verdad importa para nosotros: ¿qué pinta Ripple ahí?
Y aquí te voy a ser sincero, sin venderte humo: Ripple está en la lista de socios, pero eso NO significa que OUSD vaya a funcionar sobre la XRP Ledger.
La XRPL es, como mucho, un riel más entre varios posibles.
Y el centro técnico de todo esto no es la XRPL... es Bridge + Tempo, o sea, Stripe. Ripple está en la periferia estratégica, no en el núcleo.
Ripple está jugando a estar sentada en TODAS las mesas que importan.
Es estrategia de cobertura: "yo me pongo en todos los raíles posibles y ya veremos cuáles ganan". Inteligente, pero hay que llamarlo por su nombre.
Y ojo al detalle que nadie te va a decir, porque no vende: aunque OUSD acabara corriendo sobre la XRPL, las transacciones ahí cuestan fracciones de céntimo. Eso quemaría un goteo ridículo de XRP.
Que la red se use NO significa automáticamente que el token suba.
Lo llevo diciendo tiempo: una cosa es la utilidad de la red, otra muy distinta que ese valor llegue al token.
Resumen para que te lo lleves claro:
✅ Bueno para Ripple como empresa/infraestructura (está en la mesa de los grandes).
⚠️ Neutro para el precio de XRP a corto (el mecanismo que conecta uso → precio sigue siendo flojo).
💥 Muy malo para Circle (le acaban de montar una coalición en contra).
🏗️ Y en el fondo, esto huele a Stripe: su CEO viene de Bridge, sale en su cadena Tempo, y el núcleo técnico es suyo.
Esto va de raíles, no de tokens. Y el que entienda esa diferencia, va a leer este mercado mucho mejor que el que solo mira el precio.
¿Qué opináis? ¿Ripple cubriéndose las espaldas o tiene una carta que aún no enseña? 👇
China just pulled off the biggest AI heist in history on Anthropic.
In a letter sent to the Senate Banking Committee, Anthropic accused operators tied to Alibaba's Qwen AI lab of running the largest model extraction attack the company has ever detected.
The numbers are truly insane:
Alibaba allegedly used roughly 25,000 fraudulent Claude accounts to generate 28.8 million queries over a 44 day operation that ran from April 22 to June 5, all aimed directly at Claude's two most commercially valuable skills - advanced software engineering and agentic reasoning (the ability to plan and execute multi step tasks on its own).
For context, this SINGLE campaign was larger than every previous Chinese campaign against Claude COMBINED.
The technique is called distillation. You point a cheaper model at a stronger one, pump millions of carefully crafted prompts through it, harvest the answers, and then train your own model on the responses.
The attacker never sees the weights, never touches the training data, and never has to actually break in anywhere.
The attacker just has to be a paying customer.
This is the new playbook for corporate espionage in AI.
Competitors do not have to hack the company they want to copy. They sign up for the API like everyone else, route tens of millions of queries through proxies and stolen identities, and walk away with a working clone of the most valuable capabilities.
And here is where it gets darker...
In April, the White House published a formal memo through OSTP director Michael Kratsios identifying distillation as a national security threat and committing to share intelligence with American AI labs about foreign campaigns.
Anthropic says the Alibaba campaign started AFTER that memo was published. In open defiance of the administration's warning.
Then two days after Anthropic sent its private warning to the Senate, the Commerce Department's response landed:
They did NOT sanction Alibaba.
They restricted Anthropic's most advanced models from American customers worldwide, citing national security concerns.
So the actual timeline reads like this:
Alibaba allegedly extracts billions of dollars of American AI capability over six weeks. Anthropic warns Washington. Washington responds by locking American companies out of the very models Alibaba allegedly already copied.
Alibaba's American depositary receipts dropped more than 3% on the news and fell below $100. The company is also suing the Pentagon to be removed from the Chinese military blacklist it was added to on June 8.
Anthropic is now fighting on two fronts at the same time.
The first front is trying to convince Washington to protect its models from being stolen abroad. The second is trying to convince Washington to let Americans actually use those models at home.
If your competitive moat is model capability, your moat is a leaky API key. Every API you consume is a potential extraction surface, and every API you sell is a potential extraction target.
The intellectual property border simply does not exist when the product ships as software through a public endpoint.
The defensible asset is no longer the model. It is the distribution, the proprietary data pipeline, and the customer relationships that make a competitor's copy useless even when they hold it in their hands.
Alibaba may already have 28.8 million pages of Claude's reasoning sitting in a training corpus right now.
While American companies just got locked out of the original.
Who do you think wins from that?
JUST IN: MICHAEL SAYLOR JUST ABSOLUTELY DESTROYED THE $STRC FUD
"IF #BITCOIN GOES UP ZERO PERCENT FOR THE NEXT 40 YEARS, WE CAN STILL PAY THE DIVIDENDS"
IF BTC GOES UP JUST 3% A YEAR "WE CAN PAY THE DIVIDENDS FOREVER”
THE MACHINE IS UNBREAKABLE
FUD IS DEAD. HODL ✊🔥
‘It’s not fortification. It’s contamination.’
The UK is forcing folic acid, a synthetic drug into the entire flour supply - without anyone’s consent.
This is the same chemical the NIH warns cancer patients not to take.
@ClareCraigPath has shown it more than doubles the risk of prostate cancer.
They scream about rising cancer rates yet deliberately poison the food supply.
Make it make sense.
Here is the petition calling for a parliamentary debate.
https://t.co/63BxLuuUe1