@ALeighMP And this is likely to help millenial and Gen Z start-up founders and employer equity holders how exactly? … no one wants to start a business here anymore Andrew.
@Peter_Fitz There’s a special kind of obscenely rich boomer, having benefited from opportunities for discounted CGT and negative gearing themselves, who takes a sip of their latte before arrogantly and condescendingly explaining to you that no, akshually, you’ll be better off paying more tax
@GrogsGamut@AlboMP@tanya_plibersek It’s totally plausible that they make a profit and still don’t yet pay tax.
If you’re going to make an ignorant and dishonest claim that Tassal *should* be paying tax, you have to actually say why.
@GrogsGamut Their example assumes a 4% increase in wages for 10 years. Is that really a ‘real’ wage increase? Even if you use 2 or 3%, the impact of bracket creep is significant
@winsordobbin @metacoopr @AFL The AFL can just walk away, it doesn’t need Tasmania. Tasmania wants a team, so needs to invest to get one. All of the other states have built stadiums, Tasmania isn’t special.
@RDNS_TAI @philgorecki lol, which part of what I said is wrong? Just because someone else thinks that a loan repayment could be compared to a tax, doesn’t make you correct. If you want to compare the annual indexation of student loans, then go ahead, but is that what you’re actually doing?
@RDNS_TAI @philgorecki The receipt of HECS repayments is a balance sheet transaction involving the reduction of a receivable and an increase in cash. This has absolutely zero to do PRRT, which is a revenue transaction. Your entire position on this is a non sequitur.