因缘果

[因缘果 @dk19845]

@NEARProtocol A serious question for NEAR’s founders: why does NEAR consistently fall much harder than comparable projects when the market drops? Innovation matters, but so do token value, sell pressure, and investor confidence. Please address this openly and take holders seriously.

[因缘果 @dk19845]

@ilblackdragon @LayerZero_Core A serious question for NEAR’s founders: why does NEAR consistently fall much harder than comparable projects when the market drops? Innovation matters, but so do token value, sell pressure, and investor confidence. Please address this openly and take holders seriously.

[因缘果 @dk19845]

@Faridatu001 先用纸擦，然后再用智能马桶洗屁股。

[iPaul @iPaulCanada]

北大女学霸自曝，数学曾考50分，想通了一件事后，她成绩进步神速！

[因缘果 @dk19845]

@Cointelegraph $near

[Vadim (AI, ⋈) @zacodil]

Nice to see people loving NEAR's dynamic resharding. But I want to flag what it actually is: not a 2026 feature, but the payoff of a bet NEAR placed on day one, to shard the chain.

Sharding splits the chain into parallel lanes so no single lane jams. But there's a catch. To check a lane, a validator (a machine that verifies the chain) normally has to store everything in it, so the number of lanes is capped by what one machine can hold, and adding a lane meant a slow, coordinated, network-wide upgrade. Real sharding needs validators that can verify a lane without storing it. That was the missing piece for years.

NEAR shipped it in 2024, and that's the actual breakthrough: stateless validation. A validator now checks a lane from a small proof package, a slice of data plus a cryptographic receipt that it's correct, and never stores the lane. The correctness of a split is proven inside that package. So lanes stop being capped by one machine, and a lane can even split while the traffic is still moving. Dynamic resharding is that capability put on autopilot.

This is why almost nobody else has it. Solana, Sui, Aptos, Monad never sharded, so they never needed it: one big machine does everything. That has a cost, though. A single machine has a ceiling, so the harder you push it the more brutal the hardware gets and the fewer people can run a node, and a big enough spike can stall the whole chain. Ethereum does need sharding's relief, but its original data structures make those proof packages huge, so getting there means migrating its entire live state to a new design, a multi-year job they keep redesigning, and once Ethereum pushed scaling onto L2s the urgency drained out. NEAR is the rare chain where sharding was the whole thesis, so solving this was do-or-die.

And the bet keeps compounding. NEAR adds capacity by adding lanes while staying one road, one shared state, no bridges. Ethereum scaled by splitting into 20+ separate roads (its L2s), and this March it had to launch a whole project just to glue them back so they can talk instantly again. NEAR never split the road.

So enjoy dynamic resharding. Whether the agent traffic it's built for actually shows up is a separate question. The engineering under it is a years-old bet finally cashing out.

[因缘果 @dk19845]

@NEARProtocol 建议做一个好用的near app

[虎小象 @hx831126]

先讲一个你可能从来没听说过的人。

1930年，英国语言学家 C.K. Ogden 做了一件很偏执的事——他把整个英语词汇表研究了一遍，然后问了一个问题：如果只能留下最核心的那些词，英语还能不能用？

他的答案是：850个词，够了。

这850个词，不是随便选的，是他穷尽分析之后筛选出来的"语言骨架"。他把它们分成5类：

100个操作词（Operations）：这、那、是、有、做……就是那些让句子转起来的胶水词

400个普通事物（General Things）：名词里最高频、最基础的那层

200个可描绘事物（Picturable Things）：能画出来的具体东西，比如 door、fire、river

100个性质词（Qualities）：描述世界的形容词，比如 clear、simple、important

50个反义词（Opposites）：成对出现，学一个等于学两个

——————

然后他把这套体系命名为 Basic English，发表出来。

接下来发生的事情更有意思。丘吉尔在二战期间公开赞扬这套体系，认为它是盟国推广英语教育的最佳基础。H.G. 威尔斯把它写进了《世界大战》的续集设定里，作为未来世界通用语言的蓝图。乔治·奥威尔……没有赞扬它，但《1984》里那套压缩语言"新话"（Newspeak）的灵感，正是来自对 Basic English 的深深警惕——他担心语言被缩减之后，人的思想也会跟着被缩减。

这就是这850个词的能量：支持者觉得它是桥梁，批评者觉得它是枷锁，争论了将近一百年。

但我想说的不是那场争论。我想说的是——这850个词，对今天的英语学习者来说意味着什么。

大多数人学英语，是被一本本厚厚的词汇书和无尽的考纲压着学的。CET-4、CET-6、托福、雅思……每一个证书背后都是几千个词的暴力记忆，背了忘，忘了背，从来没有真正"用"过。

Ogden 给出的逻辑完全相反：不是多，而是深。

这850个词，每一个都是高频中的高频，每一个在日常英语表达里都有不可替代的位置。当你真正把这850个词学透——不只知道它的意思，还知道它的用法、它的近义词在什么场景该用哪一个——你对英语的掌握会比背了5000个词却每个只认识中文意思要扎实得多。

这是一种截然不同的语言观：根扎得够深，枝才能生得够远。

——————

于是我做了这个网站：https://t.co/MNteHwzK9m
（准确的说我让 Codex 做的）

原版 Ogden 的资料是一本PDF，黑白的，排版像上个世纪（它确实是上个世纪的）。我想让它变成真正可以用来学习的东西。

花了不少时间（花了不少 Token ）最终做成了这样：

每一个词，都有一张完整的卡片。

卡片上有：这个词的中文释义、英文定义（用简单的英语解释英语，就像 Ogden 本人的风格）、一句真实语境下的例句，以及2到3个同义词。五个类别各有自己的颜色，一眼就知道你在学哪个区域的词汇。

每一个词，都可以听发音。

接的是有道词典的语音接口，默认英式发音，可以切换美式。点单词听一次，点例句听一次，语速比正常稍慢一点，适合跟读。不是那种机械的合成音，真的可以听。

最让我花心思的，是同义词那里。

很多人背单词的时候，同义词只是"差不多的意思"。但真正用英语的时候，difference 和 distinction 不一样，speak 和 talk 不一样，simple 和 easy 不一样。差在哪里？什么场景该用哪个？

———————

网站是免费的，不需要注册，不会收集任何信息。

直接访问就行：https://t.co/MNteHwzK9m

如果你身边有正在学英语的人，或者觉得自己英语"学了很多年但还是用不好"的，可以发给他们看看。

也许这850个词，是一个值得重新开始的起点。
👆

以上的文案也是它写的，我越来越没有用了

[NEAR Protocol @NEARProtocol]

Dynamic resharding is coming to NEAR.

The upcoming network upgrade will enable the protocol to add shards automatically as demand grows.

This delivers on NEAR's founding vision of building the world's most scalable blockchain protocol at the highest level of performance 🧵

[因缘果 @dk19845]

@IvanPlume @NEARFoundation @NEARProtocol @ilblackdragon

[Ivan Plume @IvanPlume]

I will be waiting any kind of response from @NEARFoundation or any representatives from @NEARProtocol to respond to a matter which they have continuosly swept under the rug? $NEAR community wants an answer and TRANSPARENT one.
Cant allow a shady company to br dogging on holders

[因缘果 @dk19845]

@AltcoinDaily $NEAR Protocol. TAO has good AI models, but NEAR is the superior L1. Nightshade sharding = unmatched scalability, low fees, fast finality & super dev-friendly. Leading in intents, AI agents & real adoption. Long-term winner by far.

[Metabolic Factor @MetabolicFactor]

The neck is the foundation of your appearance.

[因缘果 @dk19845]

@NEARProtocol @BowenWang18 @grok 总结一下视频里的演讲内容

[因缘果 @dk19845]

@Freol @grok 3月3日怎么了

[因缘果 @dk19845]

@japarjam @NEARProtocol @Grok 这人是谁

[因缘果 @dk19845]

@AustinBarack @grok 这人是谁

[因缘果 @dk19845]

@NEARProtocol @grok 总结一下视频里说的

[因缘果 @dk19845]

@noBScrypto @grok 解释一下

[iPaul @iPaulCanada]

家里有小孩的一定要看看这一段！
大冰教五年级孩子如何应对老师的针对和同学的孤立，所有小孩都会受益。