[ ZOOMER ]
HYPERLIQUID POLICY CENTRE FILE RESPONSE TO CFTC'S REQUEST TO IDENTIFY FUTURE REGULATION, ASKING TO FORMALLY RECOGNISE THAT ONCHAIN PROTOCOLS DO NOT REQUIRE REGISTRATION, THAT NON-CUSTODIAL WALLETS DO NOT PERFORM THE ROLE OF FINANCIAL INTERMEDIARIES, AND TO GIVE A CLEAR PATH TO RUN REGULATION FUNCTIONS ONCHAIN: BLOG
Some people build tools. Others use those tools to offer regulated financial services. Building tools shouldn't trigger registration, and using onchain tools to deliver regulated services shouldn't be off-limits to the firms already registered to provide them.
Today we joined @phantom to urge the @CFTC to modernize its rules and unlock innovation for fintech firms and existing registrants alike. Let’s move our markets forward, and onchain. Read our comment here:
Just in: $HYPE is now officially part of the world’s largest crypto index fund: $BITW - The Bitwise 10 Crypto Index ETF.
Hyperliquid’s rise has been meteoric. In the first half of 2026 alone:
- $1.34T in trading volume
- $320M in revenue
- HYPE up 165% YTD, currently 9th-largest crypto asset by market cap
And now in the Bitwise 10!
Congrats to the Hyperliquid community on yet another huge milestone.
sure whatever you say. Stay delusional 😂
Anyway it doesn't matter it was $2 or $7. Anyone not realising gains will roundtrip all the profit & regret it once they find out it is simply another VC token which will end up in dust.
oh and i do use lighter and even got airdrop. Good product it is, just not so sure about token.
@coinbureau I have heard stories how white hat hackers are underpaid for the hard work they do, for keeping this space secure. Every Blockchain team needs them on their side. So pls pls reward them handsomely.
That's exactly why I'd rather put my money on Jeff than Vlad.
Jeff built the everything exchange and worked around the regulatory framework that would've constrained him.
Vlad is telling $LIT holders that he doesn’t even know what the future holds and to just wait and see.
Moving to a model where LIT functions as a security would be objectively worse, considering you would now subject yourself to further regulatory oversight.
Plus, everything @Lighter_xyz is doing essentially comes down to “trust me bro,” meanwhile everything on Hyperliquid is verifiable on-chain.
Hyperliquid.
Hyperliquid does not "partner" with anyone
Anyone can tap into Hyperliquid's liquidity through builder codes
A junior dev straight out of college could set this up
Lighter has to pay for external partners, and apparently they need a completely new order book and liquidity to work with Robinhood
I mean whosoever was this person played fair. He used a so called governance token to create proposal, followed all the rules (you know temp check, waiting for discussion to pick up and then actual voting), and then voted with their own tokens. Token transferred to their wallet and smart contract worked as intended.
They didn't hack anyone, they didn't steal, they didn't pretend to be a tech support to gain private keys of anyone.
If anyone is at fault. It's Bonk team and maybe everyone holding $bonk token who never checked out this proposal, never began discussion around it and just let it slide.
That's what is expected from idiots who never learn that VC tokens are created out of thin air to dump on them, by design. They enjoy being dumped on and they will enjoy yet again once $lit token unlock begins. Barely 6 months left and there will be signs in coming few months because savvy investors will front run all keyboard warriors who are defending lit token.