@jswihart correct me if im wrong but
if you can prove a vote based on value owned by an individual in a private set, maybe one could prove private total supply if enough ppl vote.
in this case a special vote required by all private holders that could prove the bug was never exploited.
correct me if im wrong but
if you can prove a vote based on value owned by an individual in a private set, maybe one could prove private total supply if enough ppl vote.
in this case a special vote required by all private holders that could prove the bug was never exploited.
1. I don’t care. It’s worldcoin. Dropping the “coin” is of course cleaner (and world dot org really sells the world domination plans), but doesn’t hide the low float pump and dump underneath.
2. Hubris time. We will be the ones that win the unbounded escalation game, be damned with the atrocities. Buried in the techno babble here is a clear escalation that I have described in my talk. People sold their private keys (was very easy to do so for a long long time, I think many, many did which means the sybil resistance is already compromised). So they escalated to provide liveness checks via cyclical doxxing. That precisely escalates the game to where you need captive humans now. If the value of a captured worldID is sufficient people will capture humans FULL TIME so they can complete “liveness checks” to get that value. Layers to this, some will do it willingly (for money), some are already trafficked humans and this is a new revenue line, some will just get bundled into a van to live in a subsistence eyeball farm. Escalate more to find new depths of human hell.
3. It does. It already has. It did from day one. Did the DPRK already exist before crypto? Yes. Did eyeball farms? No. Now they do. QED. Feel free to not take this seriously if you like. I literally don’t care. I’m done with this now. I absolve myself of future atrocities and those like them. I’m not the one blitz scaling dystopia. I consider my role in this debacle done. There is not a single good argument here to say this isn’t happening, apart from something along the lines of the state can do it therefore so can we (foreshadowing). The state has courts, and laws and due process.
4. So yes it does create a perfect big tech rug button. Notice the dodging of the more dangerous version of the state having it. Plus some gaslighting and misdirection about farcaster or something.
5. The tinder ad telegraphed their intent for the orbs. Manipulate social norms and miniaturise the orbs to scale them to remote operation. Handy for those with eyeball farms.
6. I know it doesn’t stop deepfakes. It never will. Literally doesn’t solve any problem apart from commodifying human eyeballs.
7. I have spoken to a number of ZkTLS teams it’s better in every way and the problems with it articulated here are solvable and in some cases solved. Social graph based solutions and fuzzier notions of authentic human identity are what’s needed. hasEyeballs(), is not identity.
@toly back in 2019 someone managed to find a way to convert signed raw (BTC) transactions into Morse code and broadcast them over FM radio.
https://t.co/JG36BaN9cQ
https://t.co/fbNe4Bq1hf
1/ Introducing a new paper from Lagrange's cryptography research team:
"Reckle Trees: Updatable Merkle Batch Proofs with Applications"
Reckle Trees is the core research underpinning Lagrange's ZK Coprocessor and Verifiable Database solutions.
Read the paper: https://t.co/qElAywLfKW