@Chofamba But Chamisa is not the only political actor, there is Welshman, Biti, Mnangagwa, Chiwenga, Tshabangu even, but your vitriol seems reserved only for Chamisa, now u need acres to explain, vana Cucsman have been down this road, criticism when it becomes persistent feels personal
@Chofamba@nelsonchamisa Mr Chifamba you live, eat, breath, piss, shit and dream about Nelson Chamisa. It’s feels like a very mundane use of your brilliant mind.Those words f us who support him are unlikely ever to be moved by your endless ranting, those who hate him already agree with,so it’s pointless
🔸Back in 1987 when the Constitution was amended to allow for the direct election of the President, Edison Zvobgo made a compelling case for direct election. He observed that this direct election process was core to “one man, one vote” and denounced the notion of a parliamentary executive as being divorced from the people.
It’s a pity @ZANUPF_Official no longer has intellectual muscle of this caliber. They cannot even have a sound cerebral debate. Varikubatirana pfuti nekunyima vanhi secret ballot in their desperation to rail road a brainless amendment that will ruin the remaining embers of our democracy.
They’ve been reduced to mbingarism, cash for votes and cars for loyalty. They leave their brains at the door. Intellect has been replaced by paid trolls who flip flop according to the highest bidder. Of it’s not paid activism, then it’s a predatory elite that’s stolen so much they’re consumed by the pandemic of conspicuous consumption - spending money meant for basic services on their personal largesse.
Ndozvamakaendera kuhondo here izvi? Our true heroes must be turning in their graves. Did their blood go to waste?
It’s a mess.
We need new leaders.🇿🇼
Major Pars Praevalet. The Majority Has Never Been Asked. By Devine Mafa, Zambezia Economic Movement | 14 June 2026
Dr @paultungwarara #Tungwarara has just quoted Latin to justify removing Zimbabweans' right to elect their own president.
Major pars praevalet. The majority view triumphs over the minority view.
Let us talk about that majority.
The parliament passing CAB3 was purchased at $50,000 per vote. A documented $31 million fund was assembled to secure parliamentary support for this bill. Opposition MPs have crossed the floor. Susan Matsunga stood in parliament and praised Mnangagwa declaring he needs two additional years. The majority Tungwarara is invoking was not born from the people of Zimbabwe. It was purchased from their representatives.
That is not major pars praevalet. That is major pars emptus est. The majority was bought.
But Tungwarara's post reveals something even more important than the Latin.
He told Rutendo directly — your opposing views on CAB3 actually work in our favor because now you cannot go around claiming that you pushed this bill through.
Read that again slowly.
Tungwarara is telling Rutendo — and telling Zimbabwe — that buying Rutendo's silence on Mnangagwa personally was never about CAB3. CAB3 passes regardless. The Toyota and the $200,000 were not purchased to get Rutendo to support the bill. They were purchased to stop Rutendo attacking the President while the bill passes.
Rutendo's opposition to CAB3 is — in Tungwarara's own words — useful to the government. It gives CAB3 the appearance of having faced genuine opposition from a previously hostile voice. It sanitises the process. It allows Tungwarara to say — even Rutendo opposed it and we still passed it. That is how strong our majority is.
This is the most sophisticated political operation I have witnessed in Zimbabwe's diaspora media space.
They did not buy Rutendo's support. They bought his silence on the President. They left his CAB3 opposition intact because that opposition serves them. A paid critic who still opposes the bill is more useful than a paid supporter — because the paid critic makes the bill look legitimate.
Rutendo has been used twice. First by Tagwirei's network for the sanctions campaign. Now by Tungwarara for the presidential image campaign. And both times the payment came after the work was done — one through a black Land Cruiser documented in a public Twitter Space debate by Joshua Maponga in mid May 2026, and one through a Toyota and $200,000 announced on Twitter this morning.
Two cars. Two payments. Two handlers. One voice that has been purchased twice and used both times against the interests it claimed to represent.
Now let me address the Latin directly.
Major pars praevalet is a principle of Roman law. It was designed to govern legitimate deliberative assemblies — bodies where members gathered freely, debated openly, and voted without coercion or payment.
It was never designed to govern a parliament where votes were purchased at $50,000 per seat from a documented $31 million fund. It was never designed to govern a constitutional amendment that removes the people's right to directly elect their president. It was never designed to justify extending presidential terms from five years to seven years without a referendum.
In a legitimate democracy the majority view does triumph. That is the principle. But the majority must be freely expressed. Not purchased. Not coerced. Not manufactured through a $31 million fund and eighteen social media accounts paid $10,000 each to manage the online narrative while the purchasing happens.
Tungwarara wants to quote Latin. Here is the Latin that applies to what he has done today.
Pecunia non olet. Money does not smell.
That was said by the Roman Emperor Vespasian when he taxed public urinals and his son complained the money was dirty. Vespasian held a coin to his son's nose and said — does it smell? The son said no. Vespasian said — yet it comes from urine.
$380,000 spent in one day buying online defenders, silencing critics, and purchasing a paid army for the President of Zimbabwe does not smell to Tungwarara. He quotes Latin and calls it philanthropy. He offers microfinance loans and calls it dispute resolution. He pays Rutendo $200,000 after Rutendo was already paid through Tagwirei's network and calls it settling a debt.
Pecunia non olet. The money does not smell to the man who spends it.
But Zimbabwe can smell it.
The roads are rubble. The hospitals are empty. ZDERA still blocks Zimbabwe from the IMF and the World Bank. And the Presidential Advisor is spending $380,000 in one day quoting Latin while the country he claims to serve cannot afford to pay its nurses.
Major pars praevalet.
The majority of Zimbabwe's 16 million people were never asked whether they want CAB3. They were never asked whether they want their right to directly elect their president removed. They were never asked whether they want seven-year presidential terms with no popular mandate required.
That referendum was never held. That debate was never had. That consent was never given.
The majority Tungwarara invokes is a parliamentary majority purchased with documented funds. It is not the voice of Zimbabwe. It is the echo of $31 million spent in the right rooms at the right time.
When the people of Zimbabwe are actually asked — in a free vote, on a free ballot, without a Toyota attached to the outcome — that will be major pars praevalet.
Until then it is just Latin on top of a bribe.
Devine Mafa Founder and Chairman, Zambezia Economic Movement Republic of Zemia — 14 June 2026 https://t.co/JwlwCpnbPE
@MhuriroFarai@FelySMutsakani@edmnangagwa@MhuriroFarai “Tsvangirayi akaurairwa mukadzinema supporter”, do u just dream up these things, are you trying to absolve those guilty of killing or you are truly delusional, on which earth did this happen
@waltermzembi Says someone who is trying to get back onto the feeding trough,yo political sun has probably set, and the best this will do is ensure you never see another day in prison, but remember you worked half your life to create a despotic culture of governance, glad it came back to bite
A HERO’S WELCOME…It was a pleasure to welcome Citizens’ Hero, Godfrey Karembera, affectionately known as Madzibaba veShanduko and family, to our offices in Harare. A loyal, committed, and dedicated cadre, he remains steadfast and determined in the pursuit of a New Great Zimbabwe within our lifetime.
We extend our profound appreciation to the Citizens Welfare Bureau and to all the citizens who supported and contributed to his family’s welfare throughout this difficult period of persecution. Your solidarity and generosity have been truly inspiring.
The citizens are organizing.#Chapwati #NewGreatZimbabwe
The arguments about the CCC constitution and structures are hypocritical to the core and I fully agree with the leadership of @nelsonchamisa on this matter - for the following reasons -
1. Never mind the public truth that, to contest elections, CCC had to submit a constitution to ZEC and the constitution was submitted by @JMafume, Ian Makone and Ellen Shiriyedenga- the hypocrisy is that we are all crying that #NOTOED2030 is violating the national constitution, the supreme law of the land, but somehow the same people argue that the CCC constitution was supposed to stop him from hijacking the party using an imposter. Let's stop these lies and work together for common interest. If a constitution can stop ED, then why should @nelsonchamisa do anything about CAB3?
2. If a constitution can do all this that you are saying it should have done for President Nelson Chamisa, why is it not doing it for the people of Zimbabwe. i.e why is the supreme Zimbabwe constitution not stopping #NOTOED2030 from hijacking the whole country this time?
3. You all did not fight in defence of the CCC because you felt it was "Chamisa’s problem". No, it was a violation of the core principles of our constitutional democracy. The parliament passing this Bill and the poor opposition to the Bill is a direct result of Zimbabweans failing and neglecting to defend Nelson Chamisa and the CCC party. It is not Nelson Chamisa who needs CCC, it is the nation that needs multi-party democracy. This was not a matter for Nelson Chamisa alone. We should now learn the lesson of our mistake.
4. We should not accept people in our society who want Nelson Chamisa to fight for them without support. He is our leader but not the Messiah, we ought to support him and fight together. We should never blame him for our own inaction.
5. It is not true that President Nelson Chamisa did nothing about the 2023 election theft and CCC hijack. We all know that -
(a) there was a collective understanding that going to Court would produce the same 2018 Con Court result and therefore futile.
(b) President Nelson Chamisa is still frantically fighting the 2023 fraud. As late as May 2026 he has been in constant consultations and engagements with SADC on this matter. He has written to all SADC heads of state on numerous occasions. Evidence of all this is available.
(c) he dispatched envoys everywhere in SADC and abroad to pursue the matter of the stolen election riding on the SADC SEOM report.
(d) he left the CCC as a sign of discontent with the hijacking of the people's party. i.e he has done and is doing everything a leader should do.
6. What did the other constitutionalists do when the election was stolen and when CCC party was hijacked? What did those in ZANU-PF fighting CAB3 do when this blatant violation happened? What did the war veterans who fought for one man one vote do? What did we do?
7. Where do we even get the moral high-ground to remember that there is a constitution and to demand collective action when at other critical points of blatant constitutional violations we clapped and ululated for the abuser?
8. My point is that we cannot move together on the basis of lies and hypocrisy. We cannot fight CAB3 in isolation to the fraud that took place in 2023 elections. We should reverse that because it was done to enable this new fraud. Why are allowing and choosing frauds?
9. If we want to promote democracy and constitutionalism in our country we cannot be hypocritical and pick and choose moments as we like. We cannot say CAB3 is worse than removing duly elected people’s representatives and denying millions of Zimbabweans a voice in parliament.
10. @nelsonchamisa remains the only genuine uncompromised leader. He has always fought and defended the constitution without picking and choosing moments whether or not they are politically favourable to him. We want genuine constitutionalism. When a violation happens, we should all rise as a nation without choosing.
@caesarzvayi@winkydonline Mashaya zvekunyora but as a senior Murakashi you have to be seen to attack Winky D, what a waste of time and energy for a grown up like you
@NNyashaYessur We don’t care about that theory of yours, if this audio wasn’t ruffling feathers, all varakashi like you would not have come out to defend
@chidawaTee So u have to side with people in powerful places to run your little fake rehab, and now u are an expert on story telling as well, sit down young man
@BaShonaBaShona That’s exactly what the audio says that Tapfumaneyi is KT lapdog,under FAZ,you are illustrating the point you are trying to shoot down, this audio is a huge blow to the shenanigans of your leaders and you guys didn’t even know you were being used to bully Cecil J Tagwireyi empire