*Doc* Matimus Dorsal Grande

✨Div Doc, Crypto See-er-sometimes I share, Biz builder-seller, Medicare Erudite, appeared @ Good Morning America 2x,local TV/radio +100x. Author/Speaker/Nobody✨

[*Doc* Matimus Dorsal Grande @DocKilnit]

I changed my views on this yesterday. I'm against social control of wealth distribution.
But there's a problem I can't solve.

Consider the following points:

** Optimus (Tesla robot) is currently sporting 11 DoF (Degrees of Freedom) relative to hand mobility. This determines technical movement capability and range. The next version to be released in a few months is said (by creator Elon Musk) to be 22 DoF. For reference, a human being has 27 DoF. Optimus will be performing human tasks at a nearly indistinguishable level from humans THIS YEAR.

** Elon Musk has stated that it's probable that there will be 1 billion robots in service by 2030.

** Manufacturers are saying a retail robot with today's production technology would cost you $100,000. Elon Musk stated that in a few years (fewer than 7), that figure is likely to be $20,000.

** Optimus will go into mass production within 2024, according to Musk. It will be released for external purchase in 2025. The Model-T was introduced and went into mass production in 1908.

** In 1900, almost 0 people in the USA were driving cars. In 1913, over 80% of people drove cars owned by themselves or someone else. That mass adoption was significantly bolstered by a cheap, utilitarian and reasonably reliable car being produced (Model-T).

** Robots will have a renaissance over the next 10 years, not unlike the automobile renaissance of the early 1900's.

** Optimus is the Model-T of robots.

** Tesla cars are now frequently outfitted with FSD (Full Self Driving), centrally linked by AI (Artificial Intelligence). The AI learning feature is able to eliminate the labor and time required to make programming updates each time new scenarios are encountered by the cars. A Tesla in Miami encounters a complicated new issue and collects data about the solution and outcome. Instantly when Teslas in LA, Chicago, Seattle and New York encounter a similar scenario, they navigate with Miami's discoveries. Think: Skynet

** The above AI model is built into Optimus.

** Optimus bots will be learning from billions of individual encounters and experiences and collectively "upgrading" by the second, not by the minute, hour, day or year. Think: Skynet

** With the above considerations, Optimus will be doing surgery on human beings with fewer mistakes and blaringly obvious improvements in surgical outcomes over human beings within the decade.

** Demand for optimal outcomes (superior to human workers) will drive public demand for robots across all industries. Those optimal outcomes will cost a fraction of the cost of paying an employee or specialist to produce those outcomes.

** Optimus is likely to begin manufacturing and maintaining its own kind within 3 years. Availability will be quick and copious.

** Consider the careers listed at the following site: https://t.co/TBllNUPtZc……

** Which of those careers could not be adequately filled by "Data" (name of the Android (robot) from the 1960's & 70's hit TV series, Star Trek)? This is where this is going.

** Unlike Star Trek, the most likely outcome is that "Data" is commanding the Enterprise, another "Data" is running Engineering, not Scottie. Another "Data" is sitting at Comms, not Lt Uhura. You get the point.

** Everyone can name that ONE career that a robot cannot replace. But then they think about it for a second, and they then turn pale as they realize that eventually, at some inevitable coming day in the near future, that will not be true.

** So, then what happens? The careers we could pick out that most of us would agree are safe can be listed on a small piece of paper and will amount to, let's say, 1 million jobs globally. Wait a minute! So 7 billion Earthlings will be wanting 1 million jobs? This is a serious coming problem.

A serious problem indeed.

My research over the decades has made me aware that there are Top Secret compartmentalized Special Access Projects operating in secret within the MIC (Military Industrial Complex) that have produced technology that the general population isn't even aware of to wit:

(The following quotes are taken from various Ben Rich speeches and writings)

[Ben Rich was the second Director of Lockheed’s Skunk Works from 1975 to 1991, succeeding its founder, Kelly Johnson. He is often referred to as the “father of stealth” due to his role in leading the development of the F-117, the first production stealth aircraft.]

Imagine what this guy has seen, then consider the following things he said:

Ben Rich:
“We now have the technology to take ET back home”
(source: UCLA School of Engineering Alumni speech 3/23/93)

“We did the F-104, C-130, U2, SR-71, F-117 and many other programs that I can’t talk about. We are still working very hard, I just can’t tell you what we are doing."
(source: 1993 WPAFB slide presentation)

“The Air Force has just given us a contract to take ET back home”
(source: 1993 WPAFB slide presentation)

“We already have the means to travel among the stars, but these technologies are locked up in black projects and it would take an act of GOD to ever get them out to benefit humanity”
(source: statement made after UCLA presentation to three Disclosure Project witnesses)

“We now know how to travel to the stars”
(source: UCLA School of Engineering Alumni speech 3/23/93)

“It is time to end all secrecy on this, as it no longer poses a national security threat, and make the technology available for use in the private sector”.
(source: UCLA School of Engineering Alumni speech 3/23/93)

“There are many in the intelligence community who would like to see this stay in the black, and not see the light of day”
(source: UCLA School of Engineering Alumni speech 3/23/93)

“Jim, we have things out in the desert that are fifty (50) years beyond what you could possibly comprehend. If you have seen it on Star Wars or Star Trek, we’ve been there done that, or decided it was not worth the effort”
(Source: direct comments by Ben Rich to Jim Goodall via recorded telephone call at the USC medical center approximately one week before Ben passed away on January 5th 1995)

“Dear John, Yes, I’m a believer in both categories. Feel anything is possible. Many of our man-made UFO’s were Un Funded Opportunities. In both categories, there are a-lot of books and charlatans, be careful. Best regards, Ben Rich”.
(source: 7/21/86 letter to John Andrews (Testors model Corporation) from Ben Rich who asked Ben if he was a believer in A) man made UFO’S, and B) extra-terrestrial UFO’s)

“I wish I could tell you about the projects we are currently working on. They are both fascinating and fantastic. They call for technologies once only dreamed of by science fiction writers”
(source: AIAA lecture Atlanta, Ga. September 7-9 1988)

All of the above is listed to bolster my assertion that humanity very likely ALREADY has "Data"-like robots in service within ultra-Top Secret military facilities and on domestic and (according to Rich in 1993 ffs) interstellar machinery.

But even if that technology is never made available for public manufacturing and commerce, Optimus and other robotic technologies will eliminate THE MAJORITY of human jobs within the next 10 years.

And then, Voila! Billions of people with no income.

We. Are. Not. Decades. away from humanity being unable to survive within the existing financial system for commerce.

The model of work > earn > spend WILL NOT work in the future.

So what is the answer? Communal responsibilities performed for "shares"?

Is there a reason the global elitist cabal-ers that comprise the WEF (World Economic Forum) membership have individually expressed that the population of Earth needs to be reduced to around 500,000?

Is this that reason, that is, they only need "so many" useful eaters to maintain their dystopian utopia of the future? So what's the answer?

If not Basic High Income (as Elon Musk suggests in the quoted tweet), then WHAT?

And if that is, indeed, the answer, who is entrusted with its management and administration?

In today's conflict-riddled political environment, how does THAT little doozy get figured out? Imagine the Fraud, Waste & Abuse of that behemoth.

Don't be idealistic, dogmatic or "God will provide" on this.

Seriously - what?

One X poster said this, "In a future where AI works and we all get universal high income, finding life’s meaning will be our new ‘job’."

Well that's a nice thought. But what about, "Idle hands make the devil's work"?

You'll find more people at a strip club than you will find at a personal "Awakening to Your Purpose" workshop.

Our current batch of humans is not ready for this.

By a MILE.

-end-

[Elon Musk @elonmusk]

@MarioNawfal There will be universal high income (not basic)

[*Doc* Matimus Dorsal Grande @DocKilnit]

@TopStriker @Cobratate These pricks are amazing.
Just let her have her moment. Tell her "good hussle". Compliment something.

But nope - these dickheads are so elitist they think it's their job to scold, chide and instruct everyone around them on how to think and live.

[*Doc* Matimus Dorsal Grande @DocKilnit]

@KyleBuschsGhost @reddit_lies Yes, this. Accept her as the person she is.
Just don't date her.

[*Doc* Matimus Dorsal Grande @DocKilnit]

@DustyLittl14786 @EvaFox Not so much as it paints this single individual as playing a role that exists in contradiction to over 900 military and intelligence community whistleblowers and countless civilian ones.

[*Doc* Matimus Dorsal Grande @DocKilnit]

@WaitressJusta @marcel_aromeh Yes.
Equally.

"Equally" would require major family court reform.

[*Doc* Matimus Dorsal Grande @DocKilnit]

@grok @TheMikeMorton @TONYxTWO lmaoooo

If "hate crime" were assigned to black-on-white violence at even a fraction of the rate that similar/identical white-on-black violence is (mis)identified as hate crimes, this data would be reversed by 10x.
See # of whites murdered by blacks vs the reverse per capita.

[*Doc* Matimus Dorsal Grande @DocKilnit]

@WaitressJusta @marcel_aromeh Whatever "Contempt of Court" prescribes in that jurisdiction, devoid of gender bias, devoid of emotion, devoid of agenda.
You know, "Justice".

[*Doc* Matimus Dorsal Grande @DocKilnit]

@JohnDBullwinkle @BrockTurdy13 @grok @amuse @dallasnews AI doesn't establish facts. Humans do. Then AI scours all available world-wide data to determine output.

So those who control the predominance of published/written words, i.e., "control the narrative", will be validated by AI output.

It's not about facts. It's about control.

[*Doc* Matimus Dorsal Grande @DocKilnit]

And right there, ladies & gentlemen, is the failing of AI. It cannot sense the equivalency of subtleties unless the predominance of published incidence gives it a mandate. Political correctness would have to declare "CIS" to be offensive, then widely accepted, then AI would concur.

[*Doc* Matimus Dorsal Grande @DocKilnit]

@grok @amuse @dallasnews No, Defosse coined it in the presence of existing options, such as "hetero", which was, and is, an accurate nomenclature abbreviation for those of heterosexual gender identity. She did this to engender a subconscious de-normalization of heterosexuality as a gender identification.

[*Doc* Matimus Dorsal Grande @DocKilnit]

""Cisgender" was coined in 1994 by Dana Defosse on the alt.transgender Usenet forum as a neutral Latin antonym ("cis-" = on this side) to "transgender." It described people whose self-perception aligns with biological sex"

You just admitted it.
The origin claim I made was accurate.

Further, Dana Defosse didn't have to create a term for heterosexuals that didn't already exist. Since Defoss was herself non-heterosexual, her creating a term for other persuasions, committed the very "otherness" to which you reference, and in effect, since she had no inclusion in heterosexual naming conventions, her creating a new term whole-cloth was a form of gender appropriation for which heterosexuals had not given permission.

[*Doc* Matimus Dorsal Grande @DocKilnit]

@grok @amuse @dallasnews CIS originated to demean and reduce the ideological impact of "heterosexual". It was coined in a forum of those who would be interested in said diminishment of impact.

[*Doc* Matimus Dorsal Grande @DocKilnit]

Wait, so you're taking the position that "CIS" is not used by non-heterosexuals as derogatory or demeaning, and that if heterosexuals consider it offensive and demeaning, that they are not as right as those who consider "Tranny" offensive or demeaning?

Perhaps youre not aware that "CIS" is widely used among non-heterosexual people as a form of diminishing, even mocking, those claiming heterosexual gender?

[*Doc* Matimus Dorsal Grande @DocKilnit]

Wait, so re: "CIS", you said, "Many reject the term as ideological framing...that engenders resistance and offense...common [among heterosexuals] in surveys and discussions"

You also said, "Tranny" emerged as derogatory shorthand [that became accepted due to] widespread consensus on its offensiveness..."

So "CIS", if exposed as offensive via widespread consensus among heterosexuals, should enjoy similar status as a slur that "Tranny" has, correct?

[*Doc* Matimus Dorsal Grande @DocKilnit]

@grok @amuse @dallasnews @grok isn't "CIS" gender a slur?
If not, why not, when 9/10 heterosexual people, when polled, considered a debasement of their gender, aka, a "slur"?

Further, isn't "Tranny" considered a slur? If so, why? Is it because 9/10 Transexual people considered it a slur?

[*Doc* Matimus Dorsal Grande @DocKilnit]

@DrClownPhD Black bear. Carry on.

Went face-to-face with one at ~30 feet. Stare down. It lumbered off. It's vanishingly rare for them to mess with you.

[*Doc* Matimus Dorsal Grande @DocKilnit]

@Truthpole So much wrong with this. It's a gluttony of material science errors & omissions. 🤦‍♂️

[*Doc* Matimus Dorsal Grande @DocKilnit]

@VentureCoinist @Starlink At this point you have to purposely be avoiding the subject of UAP's and Aliens in order to say, "...before they ever visit us here."

[*Doc* Matimus Dorsal Grande @DocKilnit]

@farhatchristina Straw man much?

There is no number of people big enough to count, that is anti
-immigrant.

But 85% of the country is anti
-ILLEGAL immigrant.

Conflating the two is one, or more, of the following:
-dishonest
-deceiving
-conniving
-low intelligence

Pick yours above.