@J_whomstever@NEETzscheIDDQD It means because you made an edgy joke at 22 (Tom Ellis is in his 40s), you should refrain from giving out "holier than thou" speeches on social media after accidentally banning paying players due to an LLM driven experimental filter.
@GigabearForever The problem reveals a dark truth about the left:
They will follow us to the chud realm to be offended, because they enjoy being offended. It is sunlight to a plant.
Chuds define culture, then lefties arrive and defile it, until chuds move, and they follow.
@CaptCatHands@TurnipSupa@WoWForeverMemes Opinions are fine, abuse of power is not.
>> Run an LLM over a database
>> Create a production incident where live players are banned from the game due to LLM output and poor query filtering
>> Refuse to take the L, go onto socmedia to blast banned customers.
>???
>> profit?!
@Scow21@DeepNorthStuds@StilvollJan@ClipsForeverWoW It's tremendously difficult to stop people using words to say whatever they want.
They shouldn't really try other than the most obvious name filter.
They put an LLM onto the task which worked a bit too well, and then they straight up banned based on it.
@TheChudRetarded@BishopWeyl@grok I'm still banned, I've only seen 2 or so emails go out:
For reference I am banned for:
"Wewuz Kang" the troll
and
"Beachass Niquah" the orc hunter
@damoosmann Basically every ban should be reversed for names.
Your platform allowed it, you have the option to force a name change. Do that.
Why would you ever randomly ban without warning on the first infraction?
You're managing a video game, not trying to 'teach the chuds a lesson'.
@Sines_tra@LiberalD3mocrat@Monkioh I'm saying, if your argument is Tom was a chud, but he grew up, what exactly is the lesson here?
Ban Young Tom? I daresay if you ban young tom, you'd probably never get Old Tom.
@Sines_tra@Monkioh It's not a matter of leverage, its simply the terms of engagement Im happy with Maybe its a low ball, but its what I and a lot of other players put out
> could get banned for any online game the last 30 years
Absolutely not. Forced name change maybe. Ban? basically Unheard of
@Primordialmuk Like the only way you can justify this is with lawyer speak, the conversation very quickly becomes:
"You signed paper 3434 on clause #4554 it says X,y,z, therefore you lose everything, sorry".
@Primordialmuk No one is saying they shouldn't have rules or that there shouldn't be a forced rename.
But banning people without warning, due to a literal 'small text' contract clause is pretty vile especially when people didn't even log in with the chracters.
@Sines_tra@Monkioh The adult version of this is very simple:
Blizzard as a private organisation can ban anyone for any reason at any time.
I can simply post this and move on, they can accept or decline either way everyone is happy and the free market rolls on.
@TheInTheNowShow Banning without even a warning on a paid beta is punitive.
Surely this week this will be reversed/walked back and just converted into a forced rename?
Surely....
@Sines_tra@Monkioh They absolutely did not know that, nor was there any precedent of random bans without warnings or forced renames.
That's was so aggregious about this. It was completely without warning.
@Monkioh I guess that's the point. A joke between friends.
Your lucky, they didn't run a no context LLM over the old chat logs between friends and ban people without recourse... right?
You can see why that would be stupid no?