@JRBneuropsiq Who defines the bridge between a and b? And in the case of b or c, if they are triggered by interactive relationships with the environment, why is the disorder attributed to the subject?
New case series:In PD dementia,cognitive fluctuations were consistently time‑locked to hypotensive episodes on 24‑hr BP monitoring — independent of levodopa timing. Recognizing & treating hypotension may be key to improving cognition. @AMahajanMD@UCMovDis https://t.co/iN5V0YKelC
@JRBneuropsiq No creo que la TMR ni ACT como derivado establezcan que el lenguaje crea el sufrimiento. Establece que HAY sufrimiento en el devenir de la vida, pero la forma en la que el organismo humano se relaciona con él, es el origen, ahí sí, de los problemas psicológicos.
@JRBneuropsiq 6/ verbal behavior related to the self, considered as "self-concept". The myth of behaviorism as an oversimplified version of psychological phenomena is something that still needs to be discussed.
@JRBneuropsiq 5/ I have never read such a thing like treating emotion as an epiphenomenon with no functional role with clinical relevance in the behaviorism literature. Indeed, emotional responses can become conditioned stimuli that evoke strong behavioral patterns, including
@JRBneuropsiq 4/ I don't think that behaviorism doesn't address core clinical phenomena, indeed, core beliefs and affection are treated with equal importance as observable behavior and all together imply complex relationships that are defined as the clinical picture
@JRBneuropsiq 3/ How would a cognitive dimension (misinterpretations) could create an affective one (sadness, frustration etc) might fall into a dualistic principle (cognition creates emotion and then behavior), but I said I'm not sure.
@JRBneuropsiq 2/ I mentioned dualism given the comment in the abstract that misinterpretations of the context reinforce (how?) the ideas of inadequacy etc and that produces the affective picture and (I assume) that creates the depressive behavior as such
@JRBneuropsiq Some answers 1/ Totally agree, the affective experience is a core ingredient of human and psychological suffering, I never said anything against that. 2/ I never mentioned behaviorist, just psychophysiology as the study of the neuphysiological dimension of behavior
@JRBneuropsiq@NTFabiano I would add that the loss of sense of agency in this model is not result of experiencing chronic or unpredictable stress, but from the experiencing that the organism's responded do not have an impact or result in changes on the context
@JRBneuropsiq Just speculating, I need to read it first haha. Seriously, there is a branch of psychophysiology with a strong dualistic perspective, not helpful from my viewpoint, and the abstract looks alike
@JRBneuropsiq Wonderful! Would be great if the term "interpretation" was not needed, and rather the model could explain the concept of psychalgia in concrete psychophysiological terms, for which the cognitive component is rather a response, not mediator