Physician by day. Weaver of forbidden fantasies by night. Exploring the darker realms of bondage & servitudeโwhere desire defies convention 18+ ๐คโ๏ธ๐ธ๐ฌ๐บ๐ธ
๐ฆ๐๐ฟ๐ถ๐ฝ๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐๐ต๐ฎ๐ถ๐ป๐ฒ๐ฑ.
Kai went up Mount Namuli ๐ข๐ญ๐ฐ๐ฏ๐ฆ, before dawn, for a sunrise he ๐ฏ๐ฆ๐ท๐ฆ๐ณ saw.
By the time he awoke, he was already ๐ด๐ต๐ณ๐ช๐ฑ๐ฑ๐ฆ๐ฅ โ ๐๐ฒ๐๐, ๐๐ต๐ผ๐ฟ๐๐, ๐๐ฟ๐ฎ๐ถ๐ป๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ ๐ด๐ผ๐ป๐ฒ โ ๐ค๐ฉ๐ข๐ช๐ฏ๐ฆ๐ฅ into a wide, obscene X, suspended above the forest floor, ๐ฏ๐น๐ถ๐ป๐ฑ๐ณ๐ผ๐น๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฑ, ๐ด๐ฎ๐ด๐ด๐ฒ๐ฑ with a black rubber cock, wearing nothing but a fundoshi and his combat boots.
๐๐ป๐ฑ ๐ต๐ฒ ๐๐ฎ๐ ๐บ๐ถ๐ด๐ต๐๐ ๐ต๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฑ.
โโโ
Four men stood over him in the dark and handled him the way men handle livestock.
One palm flat on his chest. ๐ ๐ฉ๐ข๐ฏ๐ฅ ๐ฅ๐ณ๐ข๐จ๐จ๐ฆ๐ฅ ๐ถ๐ฑ ๐ต๐ฉ๐ฆ ๐ช๐ฏ๐ด๐ช๐ฅ๐ฆ ๐ฐ๐ง ๐ฉ๐ช๐ด ๐ต๐ฉ๐ช๐จ๐ฉ โ ๐ข๐ฏ๐ฅ ๐ด๐ต๐ฐ๐ฑ๐ฑ๐ฆ๐ฅ ๐ด๐ฉ๐ฐ๐ณ๐ต ๐ฐ๐ง ๐ฉ๐ช๐ด ๐จ๐ณ๐ฐ๐ช๐ฏ.
On purpose.
Then one dry finger, up the arse, to the second knuckle. Turned once. Raking his secret spot into a fiery knot.
Nine seconds of insidious invasion. Then nothing.
โโโ
Because a man who takes you in ten minutes only wants a body.
But, a man who ๐ฑ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐๐ you, ๐๐๐ฟ๐ถ๐ฝ๐ you, ๐๐๐ฟ๐ถ๐ป๐ด๐ you up, ๐ณ๐ถ๐ป๐ด๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ you once and then ๐๐๐ผ๐ฝ๐ at the ๐ฒ๐ฑ๐ด๐ฒ has a ๐ฝ๐น๐ฎ๐ป.
And a ๐ฝ๐น๐ฎ๐ป means he has ๐ต๐ฉ๐ฐ๐ถ๐จ๐ฉ๐ต about you. And being thought about is far more frightening than being used.
โโโ
A callosed hand cupped the whole of his package through the cloth and squeezed. Twice. Slowly. The way you test fruit at a stall.
A voice, in Portuguese, to a buyer behind him:
"๐๐ถ๐ข๐ฏ๐ต๐ฐ๐ด ๐ข๐ฏ๐ฐ๐ด?" โ How old?
"๐๐ณ๐ช๐ฏ๐ต๐ข ๐ฆ ๐ค๐ช๐ฏ๐ค๐ฐ."
"๐ ๐ท๐ช๐ณ๐จ๐ฆ๐ฎ?" โ Is he a virgin?
"๐๐ค๐ฉ๐ฐ ๐ฒ๐ถ๐ฆ ๐ด๐ช๐ฎ." โ I think so.
โโโ
And somewhere in the middle of it, Kai's cock leaked straight through the fundoshi.
The stranger felt it happen. Laughed โ short, quiet, genuinely delighted.
"๐๐ฉ. ๐๐ญ๐ฆ ๐จ๐ฐ๐ด๐ต๐ข."
๐๐ต. ๐๐ฒ ๐น๐ถ๐ธ๐ฒ๐ ๐ถ๐.
โโโ
That is the whole of the problem, the whole of the solution, and the whole of his sentence. A life sentence. One that will change his life forever.
Because a man who secretly ๐ญ๐ช๐ฌ๐ฆ๐ด it is the easiest kind of all to break โ and the man who says so, across a dusty yard, is going to be right about almost everything.
๐ฃ๐ฅ๐ข๐๐ข๐๐จ๐: ๐ ๐ฅ๐จ๐๐ ๐๐ช๐๐๐๐ก๐๐ก๐ โ ๐๐๐๐๐ก๐๐ ๐๐ก๐ ๐ง๐ฅ๐๐๐ก๐๐.
Free to read. 18+.
๐๐ถ๐ป๐ธ:
https://t.co/Ej9G3WVtKe
#BDSM #GayFiction #Bondage #EroticFiction #SlaveTraining #asianhunk #gay #bdsmart #mmromance #chudaiใ ค
is the physician engineer possible?
as someone who works in both medicine and tech, i feel like the physician engineer is more of a possibility now than ever
the headline is probably going to turn some heads and make alarm bells go off so let me first describe what i mean and don't mean by a physician engineer
being a physician engineer does not mean:
- you vibe code your way to production
- you fully rely on claude/codex to be your actual engineer and assume that everything it is doing is correct
- you don't have an actual engineer that works to make sure that the code is shipped in the proper way
what being a physician engineer does mean however is that you can get into a repo and use tools to build flows or make changes that take the intentions of what a clinical user would want into an account
it means that you can find a niche problem in your clinic and use code to solve it (and then have it reviewed before deploy). it also means that when you run into a problem, the first option isn't always to find a third party solution but to see if there are other ways to go about fixing the problem. sometimes the right answer may be to buy a product or tool that does the job but it doesn't always have to be.
for docs who want to expand the scope of their work and dip their toes into consulting, tech, etc. being a physician engineer can be a huge unlock
consider consulting - it's one thing to advise a company on how the product should look or work or what a clinician would want. it's a completely game changing thing to be able to show up with working prototypes that are connected to their actual codebase or staging environment and show how the product could change or evolve based on what a clinician thinks. ive done this a number of times across different companies and it is very cool to see people react to a flow built by a person that can actually also be a user of it. especially because medicine is complex and even the simplest things have so much nuance
one thing to remember - this takes work. in my experience, clinicians have a great sense of what they don't want but have a tough time articulating what they do want a tool to do. it's easy to identify things that don't work well but takes thought and some deeper level understanding of how systems are built to find a useful solution
on top of that, there is a base set of knowledge needed for how code works. things like git, staging vs production environments, env variables, worktrees/branches, and now in the world of AI things like MCP, skills, cloud agents, etc.
this sounds like a lot but it isn't impossible. many docs i know are getting burned out by full time medicine. i don't blame them (i'm part time myself). there's something nice about being able to practice clinically and then also use your clinical skillset to build things that can have more reach. it's also a completely different skillset and for me a different part of my brain when i'm building vs practicing medicine
lots of people ask how to get started. i usually tell them to figure out something that bothers them in medicine and build that. my first medical iOS app was a vanco dose calculator because i didnt want to keep calling pharmacy to see what dose of vanco i needed for a given patient. i asked the pharmacist for the PDF of their criteria and turned it into a little app during ICU nights (ofc i still validated outputs with pharmacy and had safety measures built in).
the other thing is to follow other docs who are building and learn from them. share what you build. ive learned so much from people like @samarthrawal, @JoshCMandel, and @txmedai and it's great to see different tools clinicians put out and how they think about solving problems i've encountered in clinical practice.
everyone has to start somewhere. if there is more interest in this topic lmk and maybe i can put together some resources for people to get started
@DocMvn@monicammande Agreed. Miracles are possible. And believers are also reminded not to put the Lord to the test.
Accurate and wise statement though. Thank you for sharing
The best way is to write your own, and then only ask your model of choice to refine.
As a doctor who is involved in medical education, over reliance on AI to think, write and even dictate what is thought to be "the perfect art of writing" is not the correct way to use it. And it js crippling my Juniors.
Ask AI to brainstorm for ideas.
To look for loopholes in your existing work
To suggest and provide examples of arguments for and against
To make concise
That is the correct way.
๐จBREAKING: PEOPLE KNOW WHEN YOU'RE USING CHATGPT AND CLAUDE.
โThe structure, the tone, the excessive polish. It all gives you away.
โ7 prompts that fix this: