Matthew Smith

higher ed administration, accreditation director, father of two, pianist, singer, and overall kind human being.

[Matthew Smith @drmatthewjsmith]

I just wrote a review on Adjustable UltraCool Pillow https://t.co/lsZTMApH4D via @yotpo

[Matthew Smith @drmatthewjsmith]

@elonmusk Did you vote for a democratic congress when the presidency was held by a republican recently?

[Dr. Gregory Washington @GMUPres]

I want to thank our accreditation team led by Matt Smith! Pending affirmation by the full SACSCOC Board, we have successfully completed our reaffirmation of accreditation with no recommendations!👏

Our team is pictured here with SACSCOC Committee Chair Elizabeth Bejar from @FIU!

[Matthew Smith @drmatthewjsmith]

@POTUS What we see today is a direct result of the democrats’ 💩-show in Washington DC. This party must get it together and not pave the way for a huge nationwide red wave in 2022. Shame on every dem in congress and the White House. Pres Biden must step up and be a better leader

[Jerry L. Mize @JerryLMize]

Adding onto this. The posted erratum is NOT an erratum. The abuse of power and gaslighting continues. This journal should not be trusted. 😡 @sciencedirect @jsm2334 @ElsevierConnect

[Matthew Smith @drmatthewjsmith]

@PedsDocDex

[Matthew Smith @drmatthewjsmith]

And now an “erratum” is forthcoming but not yet available for download.

[Prof Jeffrey S Morris @jsm2334]

When you are senior editor of a journal and handle your own paper, it is not peer review, it is an editorial:

[Matthew Smith @drmatthewjsmith]

@sciencedirect @ElsevierConnect @RetractionWatch @ToxSci @SOToxicology This article, the suspicious circumstances around its review and handling, and the fact that it was actually published, are A STAIN ON THE FIELD OF TOXICOLOGY. SHAME ON ELSEVIER/SCIENCEDIRECT.

[Matthew Smith @drmatthewjsmith]

@jsm2334

[Jerry L. Mize @JerryLMize]

Erratum’s are great and all and is much needed in this case. But it’s not enough. The document should be pulled completely. And an editor should not be able to abuse their power like this and remain editor @ElsevierConnect @sciencedirect

[Matthew Smith @drmatthewjsmith]

@jsm2334 Erratum apparently forthcoming… but not yet available for download.

[Mark Dexter @PedsDocDex]

@jsm2334 @GidMK If vaccines were five times as deadly as COVID, there would be piles of bodies in the streets.

[Matthew Smith @drmatthewjsmith]

@sciencedirect @insidehighered @ToxSci @SOToxicology

[Matthew Smith @drmatthewjsmith]

@ElsevierConnect SHAME!!! Further evidence that this pub is bogus and unscientific. They’ve “changed the handling editor” even though it was published more than 2 weeks ago. Abuse of power by editor in chief Tsatsakis, using position as a bully pulpit. ELSEVIER MUST TAKE ACTION

[Matthew Smith @drmatthewjsmith]

@insidehighered @SOToxicology @ToxSci @sciencedirect @ElsevierConnect

[Matthew Smith @drmatthewjsmith]

@jsm2334 YES!!! I’m an immunotoxicologist. Paper is clearly not rooted in science. Full of mistruths, misrepresented data. Ethical violation, abuse of power by editor in chief. @ElsevierConnect should be ashamed that they let this happen. Complaints by email [email protected]

[Prof Jeffrey S Morris @jsm2334]

When you are senior editor of a journal and handle your own paper, it is not peer review, it is an editorial:

[Matthew Smith @drmatthewjsmith]

@JerryLMize @ElsevierConnect @sciencedirect @insidehighered @ToxSci @SOToxicology

[Matthew Smith @drmatthewjsmith]

@JerryLMize @ElsevierConnect @sciencedirect @insidehighered @sciencedirect

[Matthew Smith @drmatthewjsmith]

@JerryLMize @ElsevierConnect @sciencedirect @insidehighered @jsm2334

[Matthew Smith @drmatthewjsmith]

@JerryLMize @ElsevierConnect @sciencedirect @insidehighered SHAMEFUL DISPLAY. POLITICAL ABUSE OF POWER BY EDITOR IN CHIEF. MISREPRESENTED DATA, BAD SCIENCE. @sciencedirect @ElsevierConnect should take action against this individual and the journal.

[Matthew Smith @drmatthewjsmith]

@JerryLMize @ElsevierConnect @sciencedirect @insidehighered