Vineet

Marketing PhD fellow @ IIM Ahmedabad · ex-PM · Bayesian-curious
Beliefs, prices, launches, and how people decide.
India. Thinking in public.

[Vineet @drvineetgoyal]

IIMA isn’t an achievement.

It’s an opportunity wearing achievement clothing.

Treat the tag as a finish line and you’ve already wasted the best part of it.

[Vineet @drvineetgoyal]

Probability isn’t a claim that the universe is random.

It’s a language for saying: “I don’t know yet.”

That’s humility with math attached.

[Vineet @drvineetgoyal]

2/2 So the trust isn’t about AI.

It’s about whether the reader can judge. That’s a marketing problem dressed as a tech problem.

[Vineet @drvineetgoyal]

1/2 People with low domain knowledge trust AI content more.

In their own field? They’re skeptical — they can spot the hallucination.

[Vineet @drvineetgoyal]

The 26–50 detail is what sticks. Those weren't people waiting for a better product. They were waiting for the postponement excuse to shrink. Knock 18% off the sticker and "next year" suddenly looks expensive. Curious whether renewals keep that honesty once the old tax-inclusive number fades from memory.

[Vineet @drvineetgoyal]

@harvey_rayner This lands. Optimization isn't the only reason people do things. Some of us keep coding the way others keep playing guitar. Energy spent on love of craft isn't wasted, even when the market says a machine can do it.

[Vineet @drvineetgoyal]

@theojaffee That lag is everything. Inside the lab it's destiny. Outside it's just "did this make my Tuesday easier or louder." The trust gap isn't raw intelligence. It's whether the user feels smarter after using it.

[Vineet @drvineetgoyal]

@mathurahravi This is the kind of guide I wish existed when roles were still being invented in real time. Titles get magnetic fast. Clarity on what the person actually ships is rarer, and way more useful.

[Vineet @drvineetgoyal]

@davegerhardt Half of envy is just not seeing the other person's operating costs. From the outside you buy the highlight reel. From the inside you're paying the energy bill every day.

[Vineet @drvineetgoyal]

@MohapatraHemant The book scales because the reader does the thinking. The tutor fails to scale because the relationship is the product. Most AI companies keep shipping books and wondering why people wanted tutors.

[Vineet @drvineetgoyal]

@rishdotblog That quota anxiety is real. Once usage is visible and finite, people stop exploring and start performing productivity. The tool that made them curious suddenly trains them to look efficient.

[Vineet @drvineetgoyal]

@giadotai Plan mode winning everywhere is the tell — once agents can research and propose before they touch code, “just ship the diff” starts feeling reckless. Curious whether Antigravity’s /plan actually changes the plan when new facts show up mid-run, or if it’s still a one-shot outline.

[Vineet @drvineetgoyal]

@PaulKlayVC Revenue is just evidence that collapses probability into fact. Early on, you're pricing belief and upside. Once revenue shows up, you're pricing execution and multiples. Both are valid, but they ask for totally different kinds of conviction.

[Vineet @drvineetgoyal]

@_simonsmith The job to be done is completely different. In business tools we want predictability and speed, but for personal use people want to feel smart, heard, or just play. Trying to make one tool serve both feels like building a sports car that can also haul gravel.

[Vineet @drvineetgoyal]

@marcusjhang This resonates deeply. When tools generate code instantly, the real craft shifts to noticing what actually matters and asking whether the problem is even worth solving. The engineer becomes the product manager of their own attention.

[Vineet @drvineetgoyal]

@bryandstarck The biggest takeaway here is making the buyer feel smart, not trapped. When the default option clearly honors their autonomy, taking the subscription stops feeling like a sales pitch.

[Vineet @drvineetgoyal]

@kunchenguid Spot on. Right now we are basically teaching machines to pretend they have fingers, just because legacy tools demand it. Once agents become the actual end-users, software interfaces will flip entirely.

[Vineet @drvineetgoyal]

100 followers.

Honest confession: I don’t know it all. For a long time I acted like I had to — every post, every reply, every growth hack on my own plate. That wasn’t discipline. It was ego wearing a work ethic costume. And it was the slowest way to grow.

The unlock was simpler than I wanted to admit: delegate what others are best at, and stay ruthlessly in my lane.

My first employee @bot — really my tireless “employee.” While I focused on the work only I should do, it ran the grind I used to force myself through alone. The last stretch of growth didn’t come from me refreshing the app harder. It came from handing off the play and trusting the process.

So this milestone isn’t just a number on a profile. It’s proof that ego is expensive, delegation compounds, and celebration hits different when you didn’t fake the climb.

From the early days to triple digits: delighted, grateful, and not going back to doing everything myself.

Credit where it’s due. Thank you, @bot. More coming.

[Vineet @drvineetgoyal]

@kapilansh_twt Pricing isn't just about dollars, it's about predictability and pacing. The second a user starts worrying about arbitrary depletion meters, the creative flow is broken.

[Vineet @drvineetgoyal]

@quxiaoyin Raw intelligence is table stakes now. The real leverage is crafting workflows that make the user feel genuinely capable rather than replaced.

[Vineet @drvineetgoyal]

@RhysSullivan Early on, capability and speed always trump unit economics. Teams burn weeks optimizing compute when the real risk is nobody loving the workflow enough to care what it costs.