We just needed 12 more to vote No to stop this trojan-horse bill, because it takes 2/3 to pass under a suspension of the rules.
Too many were afraid to vote against the “KIDS Act” title, or didn’t know what the bill will really do, or just want government to have total control.
This section you see is from the (KIDS ACT) ⬅️
It shows you the REAL INTENTION on page 110. 🚨
First this ENTIRE bill is a wolf in sheep's clothing🚨 - it uses children's safety as a vehicle to expand government control over the internet, normalize surveillance and verification systems, and create a regulatory framework that can be expanded to adults later.⚠️
One section that LIFTS the MASK is page 110 🎭 where they RESTRICTED DC as ONLY place where you can CONSTITUTIONALLY CHALLENGE this SURVEILLANCE court IN COURT ‼️
In the jurisdiction provision (Section 702)
IF this bill were truly about protecting children, why would you need to concentrate all constitutional challenges in one court?
It TELLS you this is about controlling the legal narrative and preventing scattered rulings that might strike down provisions.⚠️⚠️
——-
Deeper look there are TONS of CONTRADICTIONS 🚨🚨
The bill says it does not require age verification in three separate places:
• Page 38, Section 220: "Nothing in this subtitle may be construed to require the provider of a covered platform to implement an age gating or age verification functionality"
• Page 99, Section 602(f): Same language for COPPA 2.0
• Page 13, Section 103(f): "Nothing in this section may be construed to require the submission of government-issued identification"
But every single protection in the bill is triggered by one phrase: when a platform "knows" a user is a minor. The "knows" standard is defined as "know or should have known" on pages 17, 40, 45, and 79.⚠️
This creates an impossible trap:🚨
1. If a platform does NOT verify age, it "should have known" minors were present and faces liability for failing to provide protections
2. If a platform DOES verify age, it collects age data on every user, which creates privacy risks and potential liability
The bill says "you don't have to verify age" while simultaneously making it impossible to comply without verifying age. This is not a contradiction. This is the design.
The bill uses children's safety as the vehicle to normalize age verification across the entire internet. Once age verification infrastructure exists for minors, it exists for everyone. The system built to check if you are 16 will be the same system used to check if you are 21, 35, or a registered voter.⚠️🚨🚨🚨
—
JURISDICTION SHELL GAME 🚨
Page 107, Section 702: "The United States District Court for the District of Columbia shall have exclusive jurisdiction over any challenge to the constitutionality of this Act or the constitutionality of any action, finding, or determination under this Act."
One court. All challenges. No exceptions.
This means:
• A company in California cannot challenge in the Ninth Circuit
• A civil liberties group in New York cannot challenge in the Second Circuit
• Every constitutional challenge must go to the same DC court that routinely handles federal government cases
This is designed to concentrate legal challenges in a venue favorable to the government and prevent multiple circuit courts from issuing injunctions against the law. If the DC court upholds the law once, it becomes extremely difficult to challenge elsewhere.🚨🚨
—-
THE ADVERTISING MEASUREMENT LOOPHOLE🚨🚨
Page 39, Section 233(b): "Nothing in this subtitle may be construed to limit the processing of personal information solely for measuring or reporting advertising or content performance, reach, or frequency, including through an independent measurement."
➡️⚠️🚨The "Stop Profiling Youth and Kids Act" does not stop profiling for advertising measurement. It only stops "market research." Platforms can still process minor's personal information for advertising performance metrics. This is the commercial exploitation pathway left open while the privacy provisions are presented as protections. 😆
—-
Here’s the roll call of members of Congress who betrayed the Constitution and the American people by voting yes on the KIDS Act.
The sickest part is that these people used “protecting kids” as an excuse to further insert government between parents and their children—all while establishing a surveillance infrastructure to monitor and control Americans of all ages.
@jxminiemxchi@ArthurBoreman "my car will last 10 years but I'll leave a new one after 3 years so my lease payment should be zero since I'm not consuming the car"
@ZaidJilani@MattWalshBlog Ah right I forgot the Klan runs every other nation on the planet which is why they don't have birthright citizenship. Also the Diplomatic Klan makes sure the children of diplomats don't get citizenship
@bumbadum14 That is not even remotely true. It's a product that is extremely difficult to produce and currently has insane demand. That's just the market. Attempting to somehow break up the manufacturing process would just result in a total collapse of production and a wild price increase
@HouseGOP@RepGuthrie PASSED: the KIDS Act requires every website to keep a copy of your sensitive personal information, gives the FTC control over the Internet, and replaces parents with the government, while letting states monitor everything you do on your computer without a warrant.
@HouseGOP@RepGuthrie This is a terrible bill and you losers are supposed to be for small government. Have you ever made the government smaller? Have you ever received spending? Why are you such big government losers?