@nachog IMO sigue siendo demasiado. Si quieres talento top, o tu empresa está en su top3 de sitios a los que aspiran, o hacer pruebas así no escala para los candidatos. Creo que es mejor algo live (pero no leetcode, algo de verdad)
@thdxr@zeeg I've been thinking about this a bunch and my answer rn is close to but under 500$/mo.
This might age horribly ofc. Curious what others think
@BenjDicken@rtroar This is my answer too. With vim-fugitive being a must. I'm sure you can use another git/diff plugin but it has to let you become a power user, not just have nice basics.
For example. Although our use case was different. The CLI had a tb datasource mock --rows n --prompt "extra instructions" command that generated a fixtures file using this technique.
Extra instructions was stuff like "evrnts should be in april 2026"
I see how this is trickier to get right in a relational schemw
I had 2 main annoyances with the old view that are now solved:
- Hard to distinguish my messages and the agent's
- Tool calls were too verbose
I see you now hide some agent replies by default, and even if it surprised me a bit at first, I think it's the right call.
I think the threads view is a very powerful entry point for new users to Amp. I keep sharing threads with coworkers and the new view surely will cause a much better impression and make them more likely to want to try Amp.