@kaecesar@deenzog@luism8989 No, you’re wrong.
“A player covering their mouth in a confrontational situation with an opponent may be sanctioned with a red card.”
@virg1nmojito We scored because Kane dropped deep and played an incredible ball to Rogers.
In reality, he rarely dropped deep all tournament, so it’s just a nonsense argument.
@Sub716485516022@deenzog@luism8989 It’s subjective in that the ref or VAR has the discretion to determine the situation.
I think it’s quite clear this isn’t a situation the law was brought in for.
People with horrific ball knowledge once again slandering Harry Kane.
We don’t score without his world class pass to set up the move, and then what’s he supposed to when asked to defend in his own box immediately after that for 30+ minutes?
Such a stupid argument.
@Sub716485516022@deenzog@luism8989 Not exactly. The specific wording of the rule is:
“A player covering their mouth in a confrontational situation with an opponent may be sanctioned with a red card.”
As this wasn’t a confrontational situation, you can’t give a red.
@thatsamybad@Mwharrie95 The problem is the team. There isn’t a striker in the world that could do any better with the way England played in those matches.
@thatsamybad Created the goal last night. But had zero service.
Any other striker in the world does not get the same criticism. Kane does weird things to people when judging football.
@swspurs@Lawrinho 2 years ago against Netherlands, Kane won and scored the penalty to equalise. Had a really good game but faded late due to fatigue. Another game where England go out if it wasn’t for Kane.
@KennyTheLength@_lufcsam Yes Congo. Kane scored twice. So without him, England don’t even get the opportunity to play in any big games this tournament.
@SteveRo41312738@_lufcsam I didn’t say that was a big game. But England don’t even get the opportunity to play in big games if it wasn’t for Kane.
He was brilliant against Mexico less than 2 weeks ago for example. Huge game.