@sankalpdomore Four months without Figma here, haven't missed it. I've been loving Claude Design for the balance between designing in code while making the occasional manual edit on a canvas. Easy handoff to Claude Code, stays in sync w /design-sync, and pages are great for managing versions.
@alex_barashkov Huge fan of Claude Design and the /design-sync skill w Claude Code, surprised not to see it here. Much cheaper to prototype than directly in my coding tool and gives you the canvas, but wayyy closer to code than Figma/others.
I care more about why a human took action. We've been using @SageOx for 6+ mo and I can literally ask "why did someone build this feature" to track every decision that led up to this moment. Or it tells me in my coding session automatically like "Alex tried this solution last month already and abandoned it bc of xyz."
@arlanoska "The rules live in someone's head." YES codifying the reasoning is also such a challenge. Recording my thinking out loud w @SageOx has been helpful for me to get the rules out of my head without having them go die in a doc that gets immediately outdated.
@TheObiLeonard I've been using /design-sync w Claude Design so I can work w our actual code using a canvas for manual edits.
I also record my Design sessions using the @SageOx MCP so that my team/agents can reference my previous iterations and keep track of why the design is the way it is.
At @SageOx everyone can ship UI, whether or not a designer has seen it. Taste needs to be built into the system, not coveted by one human.
Recording design videos has been a huge help for me. By just speaking my stream of consciousness into SageOx, I'm teaching every agent on our team how to think through design problems all at once. WAY faster than writing docs, and agents can see my cursor move on the screen as I speak.
Good things are better when shared. There's no time for gatekeeping in the agentic era.
Not everyone has taste. And they shouldn't.
"Taste" is a skill. It's the ability to choose what feels right when there isn't a single right answer. Hard-earned through years of work, developing a repertoire, pattern recognition, and a point of view. And tastemakers will continue to be the ones defining this in each field.
But now with AI anyone can create. And the world is flooding with slop as a consequence. I don't think we should expect the average person to develop this judgement in every domain. I don't think the right answer is just allowing "slop" either. We need to help raise the floor - and the ceiling - of what everyone can create. We're excited to build towards this @tastelabs.
Thanks for the chat @BusinessInsider@JayShams ! Full article below
Thinking evolves quickly! This board has sparked SO many interesting conversations on the team this week. Putting a stake in the ground *anywhere* is my favorite antidote to creative block.
It's easy to define a concept like: "We're GOOD not BAD."
It's harder and more useful to figure out: "We're THIS TYPE OF GOOD not this OTHER TYPE OF GOOD."
@sageox is a knowledge product, not a project tracker.
I'm loving @wwwsublimeapp! Feels like clipping a magazine and has saved so much cool design inspo from the void for me. Only wish is that the designer I've screenshotted would receive a little virtual high five every time I hit "Add to my library." 🥹