@ApexGodKing2@galileelaniakea Certainly the case! But I think it may be best to take the more restrictive opinion, particularly because the Saints of the Church did so!
St. John Vianney famously refused a woman absolution for 4 years because she refused to cease attendance at a dance once a year.
@JustinusRomanus@ApexGodKing2 That shouldn't be a point of mockery against him, but a shame against you. If we are transformed by the work of grace as faithful Christians, how is an unbeliever in possession of greater love of modesty than you?
Have some shame.
You will be called to account for all you do.
@ApexGodKing2@JustinusRomanus@icxc_disciple I'm really sad you've been scandalised by the posts of Konrad. I hope these actions do not serve as a demerit on the Christian faith for you. I admire your love of modesty despite you being an unbeliever. I will keep you in my prayers.
I hope you will be converted to Christ. ๐
@JustinusRomanus@icxc_disciple@ApexGodKing2 Stop taking such an impious attitude. How could you judge the exposing of another to scandal is merely venial? The images you posted were not merely immodest but indecent.
I really liked alot of your posts but I'm saddened by this.
@therespitecentr@wil_da_beast630 Not at all. It's condemned even prior to completion. Per S Alphonsus Ligouri, Doctor of the Church and Prince of the Moral Theologians.
@seanthomas85@wil_da_beast630 You are aware that Christ said to obey everything the Pharisees tell you to?
God placed these judges above us - in the age of grace, the Church - and we are to obey their rulings with a spirit of obedience
Oral sodomy has been condemned numerous times eg S Alphonsus, Doctor.
@gever1el@scdvo_1681 His argument was that observing the marital act and the nakedness of others was sinful.
"(Speaking of the marital act) such a thing is licit to do, but is not licit to see. Do not ever consent, you woman, to let yourself see your
husband nude; because he sins, and also you."
@gever1el@scdvo_1681 Ehhh... If there is certainly element of this. Fr Cherubino of Siena's work, 'Rules for Married Life's as late as the 13th century I believe, forbid entirely looking upon one's spouse in nakedness, stating that doing so was sinful.
@ApexGodKing2@TradCathKeng If it is stated and interpreted in the intention of (pea)cockblocking, then it would be completely modest in speech. Though I admit, that's not how it is used or interpreted and ought to be avoided.
@tafiloma@CatholicPods@PetriOP@TOBInstitute Its because she's putting herself forward as some kind of expert or authority of moral theology, especially in sexuals matters.
Then acts like tongue kissing among the unmarried is up for debate and that we can discuss and disagree. It's not up for debate, it's gravely sinful.