eomerth12

Data scientist. Conservative, gay.

[eomerth12 @eometh12]

@marcorandazza So, they are correct only because they are the last word? Seems to be pretty archaic.

If the supreme court ruled tomorrow that the sky is actually dark green and not blue, are they correct?

[eomerth12 @eometh12]

@tencor_7144 the dems watched Bill Nelson and Claire McCaskill lose .. worse than all 4 of these, imo.

[eomerth12 @eometh12]

@J_Ry_Wolfe1999 I agree with your sentiment. The house is won in November, everyone knows this. The gains will be muted, though. And it’s prone to swings, especially 2026 after president DeSantis wins in 2024.

[eomerth12 @eometh12]

@RobertCalifna77 @paulanoukas Lol. My area hasn’t had any restrictions since late 2020. What a disaster, I’m sorry.

[eomerth12 @eometh12]

@J_Ry_Wolfe1999 I would have most likely not voted for the bill. If an amended version of the statute that amended USC to protect sexual orientation were proposed, I would have voted for it.

[eomerth12 @eometh12]

@UpstateGrant I’m more worried about a god damned court decided to insert itself into a political process

[eomerth12 @eometh12]

@UpstateGrant I’m not worried about it, lol

[eomerth12 @eometh12]

@GabeGuidarini pro gay marriage

[eomerth12 @eometh12]

@ghostofJmadison @payer_single @tencor_7144 @UncapTheHouse I don’t think this is even a hard question, people are just fools. Why fight over 435 when we could have 1,000? The House of Commons is 650 members strong and Britain is a fraction of the size of the US

[eomerth12 @eometh12]

@LillianBelle2 Because the black pill is strong for a lot of people on the right.

[eomerth12 @eometh12]

@Pennthusiast they all look like this meme too. literally every single time.

[eomerth12 @eometh12]

@JradRabel only transactions should be taxed, taxing income is akin to a form of servitude

[eomerth12 @eometh12]

@payer_single @tencor_7144 expanding the house would bring it to a grinding halt. it wouldnt eliminate it, but it would greatly reduce it.

[eomerth12 @eometh12]

@payer_single @tencor_7144 but it doesnt matter, because now courts just draw whatever maps they want.

[eomerth12 @eometh12]

@payer_single @tencor_7144 no, the real solution is expanding the size of the house so we stop diluting votes. 1 rep for 750,000 people is insane.

[eomerth12 @eometh12]

@DreamDestroye16 @tencor_7144 @MerlinLynn75 not if we sue and get a favorable court to throw out the old precedent .. which, this ruling has now opened up.

thanks dems.

[eomerth12 @eometh12]

@yesh222 @tencor_7144 why would he hate it? his district is safe R in this map

[eomerth12 @eometh12]

@tencor_7144 O'Connor, Donnelly, and Stewart will all be off the court by 2025. You have to declare party affiliation now in SC elections. Brunner will be gone in '26.

The GOP dropped a time bomb underneath their feet, which is why I expect them to go hard.

[eomerth12 @eometh12]

@tencor_7144 I hope this is something we get at the end of the day, but i just don't see it. The court is eager -- hungry -- to inject itself into this political process. The opinion makes that clear.

I expect something closer to a 9R-6D, which would be a democrat gerrymander.