"The fight for inclusion and equity is generally accompanied by the ontological anxiety of identity threat, the fear of falling and cultural displacement among groups that were traditionally dominant." -@SMenendian#OBI
Understanding Replacement Theory:
https://t.co/n6xTyK5fzM
@Herbsimmens@ECOWARRIORSS Your comments defend machine direct air capture. The cost of a ton of sequestered co2 is known, and it's prohibitive.
The cost is prohibitive as a natural result of the strategy - so r&d or scale cannot substantially reduce this cost. This is the nature of 1st law thermo.
While writing a history of concentration camps, a key thing I learned about the collapse of democracy and the rise of authoritarianism is that it's critical for citizens not to accept the lesson of learned helplessness that ruling institutions try to instill.
Clara Peoples brought Juneteenth to Oregon 50 years ago.
Over the loudspeaker of the Kaiser shipyard where she worked, Peoples announced, "Hear ye, hear ye. It’s Juneteenth. We have 15 minutes to celebrate." This earned her the the nickname 'Mother of Juneteenth' here in Oregon.
LAUNCH EVENT 📢 Can a re-orientation toward belonging counter forces that seek to divide us? How can we bridge across difference to advance belonging? Join us 6/28 with @profjohnapowell, @InterwebzNani, @miriamjtg, @rociomsampere, & more.
Register (free): https://t.co/wuSNSUUpcS
@End_of_More@BeeVee23 I think it's clear this has been decided: techniques like fracking have shown we'll drown in our pollution before 'peak oil' will leave us completely energy-less. I think the direction we're headed seems clear.
@claysd If you're interested, I realize I could back up and explain this more clearly from first principles-your call. The question we would consider is IF ccus can have a substantial &positive role as we rush to address GW while seeking to limit vital economic impacts. Imo, it does not.
@claysd@philaroneanu Keep in mind that I'm considering full system costs, volume needed, and opportunity costs -as we should-and the result is that major investment in CCUS would be a disaster: for climate, but also in its own regard for finance. Also, the energy volume developed would be marginal.
@claysd@philaroneanu When you do the math, you'll see this is folly.
When you understand the thermo, you'll see there's no way to substantially improve this to meet climate, energy, it even long term financial needs...
@claysd@philaroneanu The fact that one may derive energy from any number of processes doesn't make all these processes climate solutions, energy solutions, or financial solutions.
I'm trained in this field and I've been looking into this for MANY years. I'm not sure what else to say to help you...
@claysd@philaroneanu I'll put this another way:
CO2 compression is an academic approach. There's nothing technical still needed to be developed.
So, why isn't it financially profitable to scale it to meet climate trouble now? Why aren't they don't it everywhere possible? It's a paper shuffle...
@claysd@philaroneanu Again, as a climate solution, yes it is...
For a moment, consider how the limits to harvest and externalized financial costs of your proposal impact the LCOE and volume of energy - especially compared to alternatives. Think it through... Climate foolish.
@claysd@philaroneanu Again, it's difficult to put thermo in tweets, so it's ok to misfire, but your not understanding my argument is NOT my argument being wrong. It's not that CCUS can't be done, it's that it's foolish. Climate foolish and energetically foolish - so, eventually, financially foolish.