Reclaim Your Humanity 🙂

Working
@raisinghumanconsciousness

[Reclaim Your Humanity 🙂 @evolvingmamma]

I am starting a thread here which will serve as a visual timeline of the #scamdemic here in the UK.

The power of 33 from March 15th.

[Jaymie Icke @JaymieIcke]

NASA Bases On The Moon... Real or Fake?? | Trending Ep346

[Flopop @florintruth]

@ShadowofEzra

[Donna K @Donna_or_Daniel]

@ShadowofEzra @theUprising91

[Jonathan Smith @Fiat__Justitia]

In the United Kingdom, we’ve managed to achieve communism for 95% of the population.

If you have kids, unless you earn more than £80,000 gross, you have the same quality of life as those on benefits.

And the government managed it without a revolution.

Incredible really.

[Bernie @Artemisfornow]

🚨 RESPECT ORDERS - You don’t need to break the law to be criminalised in Britain. You just need to annoy the wrong person.

The government is pushing through something called a Respect Order, part of the new Crime and Policing Bill now moving through Parliament.

Respect Orders are civil, not criminal, so they don’t require a jury or criminal standard of proof. Just someone saying you’re causing a nuisance, even online!

If someone complains, that you're too loud, too disruptive, too opinionated, you can be banned from:
▪️Posting on social media
▪️Attending a protest
▪️Speaking in a public place
▪️Even entering certain areas

All without ever being charged with a crime. And if you break the order?
well … that’s a crime. You could be fined, arrested, or jailed for up to two years.

It’s pre-crime policing and It’s about control, not safety. It’s a ban on dissent.

[Giles Udy @GilesUdy]

As a Soviet historian who has spent years writing about the extreme, repressive control Soviet Communism exercised over its unfortunate citizens, I find it really hard to bring a similar accusation against the Labour government and Keir Starmer.

But I’m finding it increasingly difficult to avoid that conclusion.

We have no Gulag or death penalty, admittedly, but what Labour and the old Soviet regime do have in common is the arrogant belief that they alone hold the moral high ground and that this entitles them to the total control over all those who do not share their worldview.

And like the Soviets of old their tools of control are the same…

- legislation and co-opted courts and civil service to apply it

- the policing of dissent, by hate crime orders, arrests (@glinner), the long term seizure of electronic appliances (@CF_Farrow) to intimidate even those against whom no charges are finally brought.

- controlling free speech (12,000 arrests annually for social media posts in 2025). George Orwell’s ‘thought crime’ persecution has become a reality under Labour.

- framing dissent (the Unite the Kingdom participants) as racism and far right fascism (Stalin started that in the days when Labour was his captive party, the 1930s, and ‘fascist’ has remained their favoured mantra ever since)

- attacking and weakening the family (because the family is so often a place where small ‘c’ conservative values are transmitted down the generations), including the promotion of trans ideology to confuse children in their understanding of the roles of men and women, mothers and fathers. In their eyes women can have penises and ‘heteronormativity’ must be ‘smashed’.

- education, wrested as Marx decreed, from the middle class (private schools and VAT), and used as a vehicle for the state propagandising of children and youth at their most vulnerable age.

… and much more.

In short, I can reach no other conclusion. Under Labour, Britain is becoming a repressive state which is, incredibly, echoing the very characteristics of repression that any former resident of the Soviet Union or its satellite states would recognise today (and they do and tell us so)

And with every opportunity Keir Starmer has to rein that in, he instead doubles down. Month by month things get worse.

This is 2026. I can’t believe what I am seeing. Or what I’m saying. But, yes, it is going on. And only a majority government of either Tories or Reform (and I do have reservations about both) of a coalition of two can reverse this.

… or we are sunk

[Right over Left Everytime @RightSide_Uk]

🚨 This footage of Andy Burnham being absolutely hounded by furious families at a public meeting should be required viewing for every voter in Britain — because this is the man quietly being lined up as Keir Starmer’s replacement.
Watch the raw anger. Mothers and fathers screaming from the public gallery, demanding answers about the systematic rape of hundreds of vulnerable British girls in Oldham and Greater Manchester. Burnham — the so-called “King of the North” — stonewalls them, shuts down calls for a proper public inquiry, and prioritises “community relations” over the broken bodies and shattered lives of working-class white girls targeted by grooming gangs.
Greater Manchester Police failed these victims catastrophically. Files ignored. Girls dismissed as “troubled” or “consenting.” Fathers arrested for trying to rescue their own daughters while the predators — overwhelmingly Pakistani-heritage men — operated with impunity for years. Burnham didn’t just turn a blind eye. He actively blocked full accountability. His toothless “Assurance Review” was a whitewash designed to bury the truth rather than expose it. He spent years defending it, denying a cover-up, only conceding the obvious when the scandal went national and international.
This isn’t ancient history. This is the same Andy Burnham who, as Mayor, refused to discipline senior officers who looked the other way. The same man who watched grooming gangs destroy lives and chose political correctness and bloc votes over the safety of our children. The same Labour careerist now being floated as the next Prime Minister — the antidote to Starmer’s collapsing regime.
Let that sink in.
In two-tier Britain, the feelings and electoral clout of certain communities matter more than the innocence of British girls. From Rotherham to Rochdale to Oldham to Manchester — the pattern is identical, and the cover-up machine is still running under Labour. Burnham isn’t the solution. He’s the continuation of the same rotten project that sacrificed our daughters for “diversity” optics and cheap votes.
The silent majority has had enough.
We demand:
✅ A full, fearless national inquiry into grooming gangs with no limits, no sacred cows, and real criminal consequences for every police chief, councillor, social worker and politician who looked the other way.
✅ Life sentences that actually mean life for the rapists — no more soft-touch sentencing.
✅ Burnham held to account publicly and barred from ever holding high office again. No “King of the North.” No return to Westminster. No path to No. 10.
✅ An end to the two-tier protection racket that puts imported communities above native British children.
Patrick Christys is right to keep showing this. The British people remember every girl failed. Every father arrested. Every inquiry blocked. And we will not let the grooming-gang apologists rewrite history or slither into power.
This is why Reform is rising. This is why the silent majority is awake.
Protect our children.
Demand real justice.
No more cover-ups.
No more Burnham.

[James Melville 🚜 @JamesMelville]

Here’s an idea…

Rather than the government mandating digital ID on all of us, we should be mandating digital ID on the government to monitor exactly where they spend our tax money and the meetings they have with corporate lobbyists. We don’t serve them. They serve us.

[Kate Shemirani @KateShemirani]

Good morning.
Cannot take an organ from a cadaver, from a dead body you must be alive with a beating heart a functioning neurological system and a functioning respiratory system that has possibly just been disabled with drugs and you are ventilated.
You will feel the pain, but she will not be able to respond because you are paralysed with Rocoronium or a similar drug.

OPT OUT; https://t.co/cbuSzJ3JkU

[Dr. Dawn Michael @DawnsMission]

🚨 DEAD BEES EVERYWHERE — AND THEY’RE NOT COMING BACK!

Look at this guy’s hand… that’s a dead bee. He’s finding them everywhere. No buzz in the flowers. No pollinators left. This is the beginning of the end of food as we know it.

While bees vanish, Bill Gates partners with Monsanto and “Bee Logic” to breed aluminum-resistant bees and crops — right as geoengineering sprays aluminum into our skies. At the same time, he’s quietly buying up massive farmland across America. Coincidence? Or a calculated move to control the global food supply?

NO BEES = NO POLLINATION = NO FOOD.

They’re engineering a famine while we watch. Control the food… control the people. This isn’t climate change. This is orchestrated collapse. Wake the hell up before it’s too late.
Share this before they scrub it.

[Darren of Plymouth @DarrenPlymouth]

3 million signatures against digital ID.

Today the King announces that ‘his government’ has been instructed to implement digital ID.

We have no say in how we live our lives, no say at all.

[PeterSweden @PeterSweden7]

SURPRISE.

Guess who began working on an mRNA Hantavirus vaccine back in 2024?

Moderna did.

In collaboration with Korea University College of Medicine.

[Unacceptable Cherie B @CherieBeneteau]

Just a reminder Monkey Pocs went away cause everyone ignored it.

[Alan D Miller @alanvibe]

Do this TODAY !
There’s Only One Day Left

The government’s Digital ID consultation closes on 5 May:

https://t.co/JIkjakeHIW

Let’s be honest: consultations are often used to rubber-stamp decisions already made. But if you don’t respond, it’s even easier for them to pretend there’s no opposition.

So take a few minutes to complete it - we’ve also put together a guide to help you respond:

https://t.co/nHExI9Lxmp

[Sama Hoole @SamaHoole]

Fun fact: rapeseed oil is sold as "vegetable oil" in the UK because the original name was bad for marketing.

During the Industrial Revolution, it lubricated steam engines. That was the job.

In the 1950s, the FDA classified it as unfit for human consumption. The erucic acid was toxic to the heart. Banned.

In the 1970s, Canadian scientists bred a low-acid variant, rebranded it "canola," and walked it onto the dinner plate.

Now it's drizzled on salads, baked into bread, and labelled "heart healthy" on the bottle.

Industrial lubricant. Renamed. Repositioned. Sold to the public as the responsible choice.

In addition to calories, it generously provides oxidative stress, inflammation, and a steady contribution to every chronic disease the country is currently drowning in.

[Big Brother Watch @BigBrotherWatch]

👁️You need to know this

Sainsbury's has been quietly scanning shoppers' faces using Orwellian live facial recognition in several London supermarkets

Join the fight to #StopFacialRecognition

[Andrew Bridgen @ABridgen]

The year is 1950. Your doctor lights a cigarette and tells you smoking is fine. He read it in a study. He is telling the truth about having read it. He does not know, or is not saying, that the study was funded by the tobacco industry.

The year is 1958. Your doctor tells you to eat less fat. The evidence is contested. The contestation is not in the public messaging. The food industry has been helpful in clarifying which findings deserve attention. Some researchers who published contradictory data have been quietly defunded. Ancel Keys is on the cover of Time magazine.

The year is 1962. Your doctor prescribes thalidomide to your pregnant wife for morning sickness. It has been approved. The FDA gave it the green light in Europe. Twelve thousand children will be born with severe limb malformations before anyone in an official capacity acknowledges the problem. The families are told the drug was safe. The drug was approved. Both of these things remain true.

The year is 1972. Your doctor prescribes Valium. Britain is in the grip of a benzodiazepine wave that will last two decades. The dependency risk is known internally. It is not shared. Your doctor is not lying to you. He was not told either.

The year is 1999. Your doctor prescribes Vioxx for your arthritis. It is newer than ibuprofen, well-tolerated, and Merck has a study showing it works. Merck also has internal data suggesting it roughly doubles the risk of heart attack. This data will not reach your doctor for four more years. Fifty thousand people are estimated to have died in the interim. Merck eventually settles for 4.85 billion dollars. No criminal charges are brought.

The year is 2002. Your doctor prescribes OxyContin. Purdue Pharma trained its sales representatives to tell doctors the addiction risk was less than one percent. That figure came from a letter, not a study. The letter was about patients with terminal cancer on short-term doses in hospital settings. Your doctor is a GP with a patient who has a bad back. Nobody draws a distinction. Nobody is required to.

The year is 2008. Your doctor checks your cholesterol. Your LDL is elevated. You are prescribed a statin. Nobody mentions that the number needed to treat for primary prevention is approximately 250. Nobody mentions that the muscle deterioration you'll notice over the next two years is listed as a rare side effect rather than a documented pattern affecting a meaningful percentage of patients. The trial that informed the prescription was funded by the manufacturer.

Now it is today.

Your doctor has new guidelines. New studies. New consensus.

He is confident.

He has always been confident.

The confidence has never been the problem.

The confidence is, in fact, precisely the problem.

Source: COVID19 VACCINE VICTIMS AND FAMILIES