@benonwine Reading comprehension… the police didn’t say ‘non-viable explosives were found’, they said ‘no viable explosives were found’, ie. No explosives!
@Hazzreid What makes you say they were violent terrorists? All we actually know at this stage is that they were 5 blokes with a few vans filled with plastic barrels.
@colone1flanders@thinkdefence Presumably because there are indications of a plot, which is why they’ve come down so hard and fast on this. They’ve then realised it’s not what they were expecting, and there is still a plot out there - probably now on the back burner!
@ORCHATERv2@Junglethc420 The government didn’t claim that. Rampant speculation on socials did. Sounds like counter terror police investigated as it looked suspicious, and have now found that they weren’t terrorists all along.
And this is why police always encourage people not to speculate. Presumably no bombs found in the vans, no terror plotting discovered, so now released on bail. Fuel thieves?