@kenocryptomancy AI and books are useful when used in the rights way. But saying "read this" like it has all the answers, is not an actual answer. Specially when its an idea that has never been tested.
@OiSorrisoNV@kenocryptomancy that really isnt only or the biggest problem for small and local bussinesses. and in many cases adapted regulations can benetif them actually
@AgorismFreedom@Eggsneedlove2@wolverine7x you tell me how they are legit. how can you defend it without proving they are legit while accusing others of asking to be provided what they dont deserve?
right of life in this case is right of access basic human needs. as i mentioned above, its a system problem.
@AgorismFreedom@Eggsneedlove2@wolverine7x humanity. i'd rather a system in which a small part of human get the basic need they didnt deserve than a system in which a small part of human get the tremendous wealth they didnt deserve.
how does that matter? how are you free to leave in one case?
@Paniksaw@kenocryptomancy Thats not a fact. Decline in profit is more likely. But restriction on competition, resources is more important than that so its benefits could easily outweigh its drawbacks
@AgorismFreedom@Eggsneedlove2@wolverine7x and that's not the question. that's your question based on your assumptions. the question is, are they really entitled to claim those properties, how did they to claim ownership? and what gives you the right of property over someone else's right of life?
@AgorismFreedom@Eggsneedlove2@wolverine7x i told you repeatedly, real freedom requies actual oportunity. if you are in a room with a door which can be opened but you simply cant open, are you free to go out? theoretically yes, practically no.
@AgorismFreedom@Eggsneedlove2@wolverine7x "legitimate" also change with time. it was legitimate by then, that's my point. saying one can work and get rich now is like one can fight and conquer by then. now wealth is the power. who holds it can change, like it changed back then
@AgorismFreedom@Eggsneedlove2@wolverine7x im not confusing them. you are trying to sell the illisuon of freedom and im not buying. that's a real world issiue we arent compiling a dictionary
i've misread the part about government creating, my bad
@AgorismFreedom@Eggsneedlove2@wolverine7x systems change doesnt mean anything is legitimate. take a look at the history, they always did.
thats one point of view though, you could easily defend kings rights of property. who were we to take whats his?
@AgorismFreedom@Eggsneedlove2@wolverine7x if one's parent can afford and another's cant, its simply absurd to say they are both free to go school. if they cant afford, whats the freedom of travel to them? what's the freedoom you are talking about?
governments create things. you can see tons of examples in the world.
@AgorismFreedom@Eggsneedlove2@wolverine7x equality and freedom are connected, not seperate
you keep repeating some BS about rights based on the current system. but systems change, always have, always will. definition and entitlement of property too
i can see you could easily defend the king if you were born in the era
@AgorismFreedom@Eggsneedlove2@wolverine7x and anyone has every right to access basic human needs. people arent starvinf simply because they are lazy
the issue isnt simply the aggression though. its having the power to enforce with compounding wealth and power
@AgorismFreedom@Eggsneedlove2@wolverine7x that means im forced to work for a employer though. while someone else might be born lucky and not have to
you cant give people a flawed system in its core and tell them they are free. There can be no true freedom where there is inequality of opportunity in any sphere.