FEDOS SUMKIN ❤️ Memecoin

[FEDOS SUMKIN ❤️ Memecoin @fedossumkin5]

OG 🖖🏻

[Chocolate Whale @ChocolateWha1e]

6AVAUKa9uxQpruHZUinFECpXEh1usRVtzQWK8N2wpump

old og scamaltman

HjTJfc7oxjF56cVkm5HgsF4x4Qv9eJSpHmvq5jmqpump

[Chocolate Whale @ChocolateWha1e]

Elon and Sam Altman trial starts next week; I think it's going to be a high-profile case. Elon has mentioned "Scam Altman" about 100 times; there's an old ticker with that name—an early entry.
$ScamAltman

HjTJfc7oxjF56cVkm5HgsF4x4Qv9eJSpHmvq5jmqpump

[FEDOS SUMKIN ❤️ Memecoin @fedossumkin5]

@CoinbaseMarkets $fight gogogogo

[FEDOS SUMKIN ❤️ Memecoin @fedossumkin5]

@CoinbaseMarkets Gogogo

[FEDOS SUMKIN ❤️ Memecoin @fedossumkin5]

@tobific Er verkaufte nichts und scheiterte.

[FEDOS SUMKIN ❤️ Memecoin @fedossumkin5]

@ghotoman_x @Polymarket Big win 👏🏻

[FEDOS SUMKIN ❤️ Memecoin @fedossumkin5]

@boreaswu @AlvinYap510 If I were a uma straker, definitely YES, all available data suggests that upbit was more liquid and exceeded 4 billion.

[FEDOS SUMKIN ❤️ Memecoin @fedossumkin5]

good article bro

[BoreasWu @boreaswu]

《Monad FDV > $4B? 今年最精彩的 Polymarket 战役》

围绕 Monad 是否在上市后一天 FDV > $4B，Polymarket 正爆发今年最激烈的规则大战。

争议核心来自这句话：

“The resolution source for this market is the most liquid price source available.”

问题在于：
“最有流动性”到底是指深度还是交易量？

最终价格到底要取 Close、Open、High，还是 Aggregator？

这直接决定：
Coinbase 最终价 < 0.04 → NO

Upbit 最终价 > 0.04 → YES

市场现已进入 UMA 仲裁，我在 UMA Discord 看了一圈讨论，非常精彩。

NO 方观点（< $4B）：

- CMC 的流动性评分：Coinbase > Upbit，所以应选 Coinbase。

- 即便按 Upbit，换算 USDC 后仍 < $4B。

- Polymarket 在市场结束后加了小注：
“At this market's resolution time, Coinbase was the most liquid price source.”

YES 方观点（> $4B）：

- Upbit 单日成交量占全网 50%+，几乎是 Coinbase 的两倍，按规则应选 Upbit。

- 规则模糊：不写取 Close、Open 还是 Aggregator。而若按 Aggregator，无论 Coinbase 还是 Upbit 都 > $4B。

- 规则写的是 USD FDV，和 USDC/USDT 无关。

我的观点：非常明确的 Yes。

Upbit 交易量远大于 Coinbase，且 Coinbase 盘中还曾短暂停牌 Monad/USD。
根据规则，最有流动性 → 应取 Upbit → FDV > $4B = YES。

最戏剧性的来了：

在 UMA Discord 与 Polymarket 评论区，几乎所有辩手都支持用 Upbit → YES。

昨天还有人支持 NO，现在大量 NO 持仓被人 99+ 价格提前止盈了，而无数用户正在 1 以下狂扫 YES ——
他们用资金表达观点。

更离谱的是：
那些在 99 以上买 NO 的，全是 Polymarket “扫尾盘职业大户”。
他们赌：官方 clarifications + Coinbase = NO。

但现实是：
从规则、从事实、从链上数据看都应是 YES。

现在真正决定结果的是 UMA 质押者，而 UMA 市值只有 $70M。

这意味着：

一个市值 7000 万的协议，要裁定一个交易量可能过千万的市场。
如果你是 UMA 大户，你会怎么做？

最可能的剧本是：
UMA 大户扫一堆 <1 的 YES → 在 DVM 投 YES → 百倍收益。

于是冲突变成：

规则派 vs 尾盘大户 → UMA 大户 vs Polymarket 大户。

太精彩了。

我坚定站 YES, Rule is rule。

现在还在 99+ 买 NO 的尾盘大户—— good luck.

还有一天10个小时出结果，详细阅读材料：👇

1. 详细投票/辩论细节：https://t.co/yKPHibFtJt

2. Polymarket关于Monad开盘后一天FDV是否大于$4B链接：https://t.co/VUMmKOgK0M

3. 一篇总结地很好的Ai分析：https://t.co/IUENyDdUlH

4. UMA Discord讨论: https://t.co/856bQiWzDG

#Polymarket #Monad

[FEDOS SUMKIN ❤️ Memecoin @fedossumkin5]

9/9This is not about one $300k market.
This is about whether prediction markets are dead.
Spread it.

[FEDOS SUMKIN ❤️ Memecoin @fedossumkin5]

1/9
Polymarket just pulled one of the most blatant post-factum rule changes in prediction market history.
Market: “Will Monad FDV be &gt;$4B exactly 24h after launch?”
@Polymarket @Official_Upbit @coinbase

[FEDOS SUMKIN ❤️ Memecoin @fedossumkin5]

8/9
Tag everyone who still cares about honest markets:
@Polymarket @UMAprotocol @shayne_coplan @nickbortot @cobie @zhusu @HsakaTrades @CryptoHayes @tarunchitra @Route2FI @CoinDefilama @coingecko @CoinMarketCap @DuneAnaIytics @nansen_ai @grok @coinbase @upbitglobal

[FEDOS SUMKIN ❤️ Memecoin @fedossumkin5]

@emueller9993 @grok @monad @Polymarket @Official_Upbit @Official_Upbit @upbitglobal They say you are not liquid.

[FEDOS SUMKIN ❤️ Memecoin @fedossumkin5]

@Polymarket @grok @UMAprotocol
Respectfully asking: at 25 Nov 14:00 UTC, Upbit MON/KRW had &gt;$400M volume vs Coinbase’s $188M.
1/2

[Lero.eth @lero_eth00]

Polymarket Just Changed the Rules Mid-Bet — And That’s Not Acceptable

The FVD Monad market was supposed to be simple: use the most liquid exchange as the price source. That was the rule from the very beginning. At the time of resolution, the most liquid market by a wide margin was Upbit MON/KRW — not Coinbase.

What actually happened at the resolution timestamp (25 Nov 2025, 14:00 UTC):

Upbit MON/KRW 24h volume: ~$380–450M
(45–55% of global spot volume on CoinGecko)
Coinbase MON/USD volume: just ~$187M

Upbit 14:00 UTC close: 54.35 KRW = $0.0405
→ FDV = $4.05B (which clearly satisfies “> $4B”)

CMC Liquidity Score: Upbit 78–86 vs Coinbase 68–76
Every piece of public data showed the same thing: Upbit was the dominant, most liquid exchange.

Yet hours after the resolution moment, Polymarket suddenly shifted the price source to Coinbase — contradicting the original rule and retroactively rewriting the basis of the market. That’s not how a prediction market is supposed to work.

A market is only as trustworthy as the consistency of its rules. Changing the price source after the fact undermines fairness, transparency, and confidence in the entire platform.

The correct outcome is “YES.”
The price source should be the most liquid exchange — Upbit — exactly as originally stated.

Polymarket should honor its own rules, not adjust them on the fly. This issue needs to be escalated to UMA DVM immediately.

@Polymarket @monad

[Мишель Карпенко @KarpenkoMi93647]

The MON FDV market should use the most liquid source at resolution time ✅

Data shows it was Upbit, not Coinbase.

Changing it after the fact is unfair to users ⚠️

@Polymarket @monad @UMAprotocol @Official_Upbit @upbitglobal