cloud

[(ツ) @Jacksonionoh]

You should’ve been reading Plato’s dialogue at 5. If the first time you finished The Critique of Pure Reason was after your 15th birthday you’re literally not gonna make it.

[𐰚𐰀𐰞𐰄 𐰖𐰆𐰞𐰀 @Bochcore]

#fixed

[cloud @finite_mode]

@NightmarEclipse Gamers really think taste consists in appreciating uglier, worse designed, worse gameplay products more than refined ones. The older and uglier a game is, the better.
You have to twist your judgement into a pretzel in order to find the original superior in the above comparison.

[cloud @finite_mode]

@esoterikkant Have you read Jasche logic? Im going thru it bit by bit and i wonder if its overall worthwhile.

[cloud @finite_mode]

@novasarry8556 it's actually necessary given the nature of pure practical reason

reason tries to unite its concepts under principles and will always have to ascend to the absolutely unconditioned in order to achieve systematic completion

[cloud @finite_mode]

@python_717 @ClubKamui Its hard for me to even consider that as philosophy ngl. Philosophy is inherently systemizing no matter which way you look at it. To say otherwise is to repurpose a term which has had a long history of being applied consistently in that way.

[cloud @finite_mode]

@coocoo33333 @UkeCreature https://t.co/0zNjzZJRgQ

[cloud @finite_mode]

@PolarisHyper111 @esoterikkant critique or pure reason, groundwork and then other two critiques

[cloud @finite_mode]

The desire to systematize and moralize is actually very nietzschean, if it is an end in itself. Denying myself of these gratifications would be extreme self-denial. Very anti nietzschean. Thank you Nietzsche for motivating me to pursue slave morality and be a systemizer.

[cloud @finite_mode]

@Leophilius the cosmological arguments are the ones which start by introducing the concept of a being necessary in itself and only then connect this being with the idea of god

neither of the arguments start by proposing god to be necessarily existing, since they would have nothing to prove

[cloud @finite_mode]

@Leophilius thats not how they start, thats usually the conclusion

they start by proposing an idea of a most "real" or "perfect" being and then connect the concepts of reality and perfection with necessary existence

[cloud @finite_mode]

Lmao this video is like if a human being had high tier understanding but a totally confused reasoning faculty

he keeps showing comprehension of abstract and important concepts and then reasons about them like he's retarded

[🧬Maxpein🧬 @maximumpain333]

Jeffrey Epstein is why the simulation has to be dismantled. He knew what the elites have known for a long time. That this isn’t base reality and the rich and powerful sacrifice people for their own advancement in the game. It's beyond time to remove these people from office.

Study the Hermetic Principles and you will understand how this knowledge used to trap you and manipulate you is the same knowledge that can free you. These 7 principles are the framework for the simulation.

[cloud @finite_mode]

@hexumlite It's amazing that you're conscious of this. I can assure you that your journey in improving your mental capabilities will be even more fruitful than any physical one. I have discovered this myself and i cannot but feel immeasurable gratitude for having undertaken it.

[cloud @finite_mode]

@hexumlite Hexumlite, i implore you to instead read philosophy in order to gain even more in the domain of iqmaxxing.
Reading this book cover to cover and understanding it will bring about orders of magnitude more iqmaxxing than any work of literature ever will:

[cloud @finite_mode]

@social_actavis this tweet and everyone supporting it are a perfect display of the dogmatist type - forever unconscious of their own freedom, with consciousness dispersed and stuck onto outside objects

[cloud @finite_mode]

@SKG01245 @social_actavis genuinely fascinating how much OP got triggered by it

the choice of branding that person as mentally ill is particularly telling of what OP's worries and insecurities consist of

[cloud @finite_mode]

@aloushalshami @ClubKamui Yeah those are pretty much my thoughts. When he talks about philosophers its more akin an aesthetic/literary analysis, not a philosophical investigation of its own.

[cloud @finite_mode]

@TheDrewHaas an actual good defense would establish necessity and would at the same time be identical with the arrival of it through reason

[cloud @finite_mode]

@Tomano_1 never read Hegel but isn't his project something like this?