A neighbour tried to steal the binfluencer role last night. They put their bin out very early. Slowly everyone else followed suit. I’m looking out the window now at a street full of bins that won’t be collected, oh no no no, because he’s got the wrong week. He’s jumped the gun. Amateur. I hope I get to see him dragging his bin in again, if it was me I’d do it in the dead of night. The shame.
This is diabolical. It has nothing to do with science, public health or medicine. Whatever it is about, it manifests complete indifference to the destruction of children and their families. It should never have happened, and must stop immediately. #Nuremberg2 is fully warranted.
I’m seeing common traits in critical thinkers… most found it hard to focus at school and got in trouble because of it, they talk a lot, they’re fascinated by many subjects, they question everything especially authority, they don’t like being told what to do, they’re impervious to brainwashing, they’re naturally bright and curious and most haven’t been to university or left/were kicked out early.
A free society is anti-fragile with respect to speech. It doesn’t need to censor.
False beliefs are self-correcting as the insightful outcompete the confused
Censorship and coercion are authoritarian partners. If censorship is required, it is to prevent freedom, not protect it.
TWO LEADING PRINCETON, MIT SCIENTISTS SAY EPA CLIMATE REGULATIONS BASED ON A ‘HOAX’:
"William Happer, professor emeritus in physics at Princeton University, and Richard Lindzen, professor emeritus of atmospheric science at Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), argued that the claims used by the EPA to justify the new regulations aren’t based on scientific facts but rather political opinions and speculative models that have consistently proven to be wrong.
“The unscientific method of analysis, relying on consensus, peer review, government opinion, models that do not work, cherry-picking data and omitting voluminous contradictory data, is commonly employed in these studies and by the EPA in the Proposed Rule,” Mr. Happer and Mr. Lindzen wrote. “None of the studies provides scientific knowledge, and thus none provides any scientific support for the Proposed Rule.
“All of the models that predict catastrophic global warming fail the key test of the scientific method: they grossly overpredict the warming versus actual data. The scientific method proves there is no risk that fossil fuels and carbon dioxide will cause catastrophic warming and extreme weather.”
Climate models such as the ones that the EPA is using have been consistently wrong for decades in predicting actual outcomes, Mr. Happer told The Epoch Times. To illustrate his point, he presented the EPA with a table showing the difference between those models’ predictions and the observed data."
Never forget covid numbers are and were a scam. A good example from mainstream media - man get's murdered by his brother. Cause of death? covid. Your eyes opening finally?
https://t.co/V4XQm4qNxy
Simple Fragrance Method Boosts Cognitive Capacity by 226%
"Scientists have long known that the loss of olfactory capacity, or ability to smell, can predict the development of nearly 70 neurological and psychiatric diseases. These include Alzheimer’s and other dementias, Parkinson’s, schizophrenia, and alcoholism. Evidence is emerging about a link between smell loss due to COVID and ensuing cognitive decrease."
https://t.co/YDZTi7PF5J
🩻When it comes to bone fractures, there are many #acupuncture points (local and distal) that can be used as part of a treatment protocol, but these are always a must for a faster healing process.
#TCM on Bone Fractures: when a fracture occurs the whole body is affected.
Women of Ireland and fellow sisters in this fight, please RT and try to come along on the 16th of September.
Both these events are so important for women and girls to attend.
A clear message must be sent to this government that women trying to protect our spaces in this society will not go quietly into the corner. #LetWomenSpeakDublin
#FreeSpeech #WomenOnlySpaces
The “you wouldn’t want surgeons going maskless would you?” trope is making rounds amongst the knuckle-dragging maskaholic crowd again.
This is a good review article (written in 2015) because it provides a “time capsule” of sorts into what was universally understood about the use of surgical masks in the operating theater just a few short years ago, before the world went insane.
Surgical masks do two things only -
1) they are splatter guards for the mouths and noses of surgeons, which is useful in particular kinds of ‘gooey’ procedures (such as, say, c-sections).
2) they maintain “theater discipline.” They are simply a uniform, they provide a kind of psychosocial symbolism to OR staff - for what that’s worth.
https://t.co/RBkFqZ1dlQ
To those who just follow orders, please be aware that under international law you are personally responsible for your actions:
"Dealing with a culture of human rights abuses is one of the most complex tasks facing citizens in transitioning from inherently fascist forms of government to true democratic forms of administration that protect and respect fundamental human rights. The “principles of international law recognized in the Charter of the Nuremberg Tribunal and in the judgment of the Tribunal” adopted by the International Law Commission in 1950 specifically determine:
i. Crimes against international law are committed by men, not abstract entities, and only by punishing individuals who commit such crimes can the provisions of international law be enforced.
ii. Criminal liability exists under international law even if domestic law does not punish an act that is an international crime.
iii. The principle of international law, which under certain circumstances, protects the representatives of a state, cannot be applied to acts that are condemned as criminal by international law. The authors of these acts cannot shelter themselves behind their official position in order to be freed from punishment in appropriate proceedings.
iv. The fact that a person acted pursuant to order of his Government or of a superior does not relieve him from responsibility under international law, provided a moral choice was in fact possible to him.
To restore confidence and accountability in the world, it is necessary to admit publicly the gross abuses that have taken place during the COVID-19 pandemic and to hold those responsible and liable who have committed, planned, ordered, executed, and profited from such abuses, and to compensate victims. This process of dealing with the past is an essential prerequisite for re-establishing the rule of law."
From COVID-19 LAWLESSNESS by Willem Van Aardt, International Human Rights and Constitutional Law specialist https://t.co/GIFfrSvj3c
@DrHoenderkamp@mattletiss7@FiveTimesAugust@P_McCulloughMD@RobertKennedyJr@ChildrensHD@ChildrenChd@SabinehazanMD@chrismartenson@efenigson@BretWeinstein@HeatherEHeying@jordanbpeterson@ABridgen@naomirwolf@EpochTimes@drkohilathas@thecoastguy@TheChiefNerd@VigilantFox@joerogan@robinmonotti@zoeharcombe@TPointUK@beverleyturner@MaajidNawaz@UsforThemUK@bobscartoons@OracleFilmsUK@nzdsos@PierreKory@FLSurgeonGen@profnfenton@TracyBethHoeg@pjhlaw@SharylAttkisson@stkirsch@sonia_elijah@Deel_icious@ServeOnlyGod@laralogan@profnfenton@JamesMelville@Johnincarlisle