flt

[flt @fltmu]

@Tokenoya Good take, in particular for high value, short term operations.
Privacy is less a issue if the DLT is settlement with negotiation/execution happening elsewhere.
It also facilitates acces to a wider ecosystem.
Some sensitive operations require privacy, but not all treasury.

[flt @fltmu]

@Defi_Warhol @Polymarket Polymarket curates and keep the responsibility if unlawful markets are opened (ex. Death bets).
With HIP4, Core team and validators are expected to shut the market down. So not so permissionless.
What if validators fail to shut such a market? Who would get investigated?

[flt @fltmu]

@Devchiemerie @bubblemaps You mean, so that the fund theft is less visible and traceable ?
Who do you want to protect?

[flt @fltmu]

@mert Hacks are already difficult to identify and address quickly with transparent explorers.
If transactions are confidential, how do you detect theft, rug pull and misappropriation?

[flt @fltmu]

@RwaLlama Cheers!
Good point.
"Where could it break, what can I do if/when it happens?" This is usually a good drive for analysing.

[flt @fltmu]

@RwaLlama Could you detail "contested DTC chain"? I am not sure of the point you are making here.
Thank you for the thread that help clarify those stakes

[flt @fltmu]

@mikulaja Is the reward useful to the agent goal? Or does it prefer less fees and more resources for its own purposes?

[flt @fltmu]

@zachxbt @ImperiumPaper I expected legal action by victims who's stolen funds were not frozen.
The criteria and process for such freeze needs to be made more clear and legal proof.

[flt @fltmu]

@0xNairolf What use case do you see for 1, that are not achieved by TradFi + onramp ?

Undercollateral means KYC + credit risk assessment + negative feedback mechanism to mitigate moral hazard (legal repossession of other assets, ban, social pressure...).
This forces off chain component.

[flt @fltmu]

@VieDeCarabin @DokPepper Au contraire!
La responsabilité est noyée et inexistante.
Les certificats n'engagent pas de responsabilité réelle du médecin dans la plupart des cas.
Combien d'erreurs médicales ostensibles sont vraiment condamnées en France ?

L'IA sera un super moyen de dédouaner tout le monde

[flt @fltmu]

@EchoFromFutureX @RWAFoundation_ Most investor only care for financial exposure. Don't value other aspects of stocks, and ignore low-occurrence risks.
Got to see fee level also.

[flt @fltmu]

@EchoFromFutureX @RWAFoundation_ 2 main differences:
- legal. Public equity is heavily regulated (reports, access to GA & voting, board member nomination...). Comes with heavier KYC requirements than most tokens.
- risk. If the token issuer has any problem, you too (hack, fraud, mishandling of corp action)

[flt @fltmu]

@pscltllrd Ratings should come with quote for insurance premiums. Getting rating agencies real skin in the game. And a early warning signal (increase in insured amounts)

[flt @fltmu]

@newmichwill A good security posture requires lots of skills.
And who would certify that the standard is properly respected ?
Open source has also been fighting this war, without final solution yet.
Maybe finance should be parked to chains with limited, hardened primitives?

[flt @fltmu]

@ZeusRWA And enforcement!

Most native (fractionalized) RWA token depend on an asset manager (property manager for RE, asset servicing for bonds, etc.). what control/recourse do you have on this asset manager?
For exemple, with RE, do you have your say on tenant selection or repairs?

[flt @fltmu]

@TokenBrice @andreujuanc If you want DeFi to integrate with real life finance, you need on/off-ramp. Thus mixing centralized and decentralized finance.
Integration/mixing should be disclosed and subject to proper risk analysis, but pure separation seems self-defeating.

[flt @fltmu]

@aktionariat Thank you for those clarifications!

You built a great infrastructure, and help democratize capital markets.

Now we need easier access to those information and to help de facto standards to emerge. That way, investor can focus on their due diligence and not on searching PDFs

[flt @fltmu]

@chainlink Interesting approach!
How do you manage when different model don't get consensus?
Could you elaborate on the business model (who pays for AI training and the running infrastructure).
I guess issuer have the option to directly publish the corporate action online for efficiency.

[flt @fltmu]

@0xNairolf Funds and trust address this goal.
Difference is that vault are still a gray area. They range from blatant regulatory arbitrage, ignoring decades of investor and market protection; to automated compliance, replacing trustee and third party audit with automation and transparency.

[flt @fltmu]

@aktionariat Basically, what is the difference with secondary markers for public equity, in terms of investor constraints and protection?

[flt @fltmu]

@aktionariat Nice!
Could you please elaborate on the following?
- can anyone trade on any stock? (KYC, professional investors)
- what data can we use to value the companies? (Public companies have stringent publication rules)
- how do you fight insider trading and money laundering?