Footrf1

[Footrf1 @footrf1]

@Skkyyyyyyyyyyy Must.protect.israel.

[Footrf1 @footrf1]

@spencermorgan93 He should be hacking their voicemails instead.

[Footrf1 @footrf1]

@piersmorgan Your desperation to stick up for Israel is so clear. When you're not busy using fake photos of the army in the papers you're making accusations against others.
All this ignoring the other things you're accused of which "can't be proven".

[Footrf1 @footrf1]

@DAZN_NationalLg His bodyguard clearly thinks he's a cunt. He's right.

[Justin ROSE @JustinRose99]

First @McLarenF1 signed golf bag giveaway!!

Just RT for a chance to win it!!

I’ll pick one winner on Monday 17th September… 🍀

[Footrf1 @footrf1]

@ZACWILSON_ The Angel. "My blood will forever
Run through the stone" felt the perfect lyrics for the little gunner who lost his brave fight.
I'm so pleased your story ended well and hopefully Leo will see The Arsenal remain at the top 👍

[Footrf1 @footrf1]

@ZACWILSON_ My nephew sadly passed away due to complications of CDH when he was less than 2 weeks old. Going into hospital to support my brother and sister-in-law that day remains the hardest thing I've ever done.
He would have been 2 recently and we bought him a plaque with the words from..

[Footrf1 @footrf1]

@CFC_Dubois The profile location says it all

[Zarah Sultana MP @zarahsultana]

Please retweet.

[Katie Hopkins @KTHopkins]

On behalf of their client, Zara Sultana, Bindmans Media and Information Law Practise Group requires that I publish the following statement on X, and that such statement must be clearly visible and pinned to my
profile for a continuous period of no less than 24 hours:

“On 30 March 2026, I published a post on my X account addressed to Zarah Sultana in which I stated that she encourages and incites violence and is friends with terrorists.

Those statements are false. I was wrong and offer my sincere apologies to Ms Sultana for the harm and distress caused to her.”

It is my very great pleasure to do this, and I reiterate my sincere and repeated offer to meet with Miss Zara Sultana in person to resolve our differences.

[GET A GRIP @docrussjackson]

It's a gullibility test - which Reform UK fans are badly failing.

Here’s a breakdown of the claims in Jenrick's video message.

1. “Rachel Reeves is the MP for Leeds”

Partly true, but imprecise

Rachel Reeves is the MP for Leeds West and Pudsey (formerly Leeds West).

So yes, she represents a Leeds constituency, but not “all of Leeds.”

2. “1 in 4 people aren’t working in Leeds”

Misleading

This figure likely refers to economic inactivity, not unemployment.

“Not working” can include:

Students
Retirees
Carers
People with long-term illness

Actual unemployment rates are much lower (typically a few percent, not 25%).

👉 So this claim inflates the problem by conflating different statistics.

3. “She’s in charge of the economy”

Broadly true (with context)

As Chancellor of the Exchequer, Reeves is responsible for UK economic policy.

However, economic outcomes depend on many factors (global economy, Bank of England, previous policy, etc.).

4. Claims about “Arshad Khatana”

Highly uncertain / needs strong evidence. There is no widely reported, verified public record (from major UK news outlets) confirming:

That Arshad Khatana has the views listed

That he has a close personal relationship with Reeves

That she has sought his advice on foreign policy

These are serious allegations and would normally be covered by reputable media if substantiated.

5. “She’s friends with him / visits his house / asks advice”

Unverified

Politicians often meet community figures, faith leaders, and constituents.

That does not automatically imply endorsement of their views.

Without credible sources, this is speculative framing.

6. Allegations about extremist views (terrorism, antisemitism, etc.) are unverified and potentially defamatory. The message lists very serious claims:

Supporting terrorists
Antisemitic statements
Conspiracy theories

These require strong, verifiable evidence from reliable reporting.

In the absence of that, treat as unproven claims or political attack messaging.

7. “Unemployment she’s caused / taxes she’s raised”

Opinion presented as fact.

Economic performance:

Influenced by multiple governments and global trends

Tax decisions:

Some taxes may have risen, but this is policy debate, not objective wrongdoing

This is political opinion, not a factual claim.

Overall Assessment

What’s accurate:

Reeves is a Leeds-area MP
She is Chancellor

What’s misleading:

“1 in 4 aren’t working” (confuses inactivity with unemployment)

What’s unverified / likely political attack:

Claims about Arshad Khatana’s views
Claims about Reeves’ relationship with him
Claims she is influenced by him

Jenrick's message mixes:

A small amount of truth
Misused statistics
Unverified and potentially defamatory claims
Strong political framing

It should not be taken at face value without credible sources.

Jenrick's video is misleading and irresponsible because it blends a small amount of truth with distortion and unverified allegations. It cites that “1 in 4 people in Leeds aren’t working,” but this refers to economic inactivity—not unemployment—giving a false impression of widespread joblessness. It then makes serious claims about an individual’s extremist views and an alleged relationship with Rachel Reeves without credible evidence from established news sources. The video further implies guilt by association, suggesting Reeves endorses these alleged views simply through contact, which is not substantiated. By presenting political opinion as fact and relying on emotive, sensationalist language rather than verified information, it risks misleading voters and lowering the standard of public debate.

[Footrf1 @footrf1]

@TheBarmyArmy Graham Thorpe. One of my first bats was the kookaburra bubble purely because of him.

[Guz Khan 🥶 @GuzKhanOfficial]

THIS IS ENGLAND 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🩵🩵🩵🩵🩵🩵🩵✌🏽

[Skew Spew Barmy Hairdo Curmudgeon Bigot and Smug @SkewSmug]

I'll save you having to read this word salad shite.

Lucy Connolly pleaded guilty. She's now on early release with conditions, conditions she has allegedly broken.

That's it.

She is a shit mum. Shit is a fucking horrible racist.

[Glenn Tunes @glenn_tunes]

SHE SAID WHAT WE ALL FEEL HERE IN EUROPE 🖐️🖐️🖐️🖐️🖐️🖐️

[Footrf1 @footrf1]

@RwLang711 @SamanthaQuek Oh i put "for" instead of "far". A game of football is so soft a shove is now considered horrific. In hindsight was it the wrong this to do? Yes. Did Martinelli in the heat of the the moment think Bradley was time wasting after watching him shuffle more onto the pitch. Also yes.

[Footrf1 @footrf1]

@RwLang711 @SamanthaQuek Oh couldn't respond to what was said so went for that response instead. Fair.

[Footrf1 @footrf1]

@danbardell Don't know why but I read this in the voice of Yoda.

[Footrf1 @footrf1]

@RwLang711 @SamanthaQuek No. Martinelli shoved him SO HARD he could've made the injury for worse, so surely he moved a decent distance? So that must mean he found enough strength to roll back onto the pitch, yes?

[Footrf1 @footrf1]

@zach_inwood @The_Forty_Four I'd probably worry about your own team then, you "melt".