@Digofsobral@leastsquared_ O aprendizado da ferramenta fica por sua conta, basta ler documentação e praticar. A faculdade te ensina os fundamentos, porque esses nunca vão mudar.
1- AI-generated code just creates more technical debt.
2- At the end of the day, you (the developer) are responsible for the code, not the LLM that generated it. So the less code you have, the easier it is for you to own it.
3- A good engineer knows what code to write, and equally importantly, what code not to write or to delete.
(BTW, this is what we old-school software engineers have been saying for a long time, and we've been called all sorts of names for it.)
@FelipeTadewald@bortoncorreaCFO Porque é uma analogia burra, bilionários como André Esteves e Joesley Batista ganham dinheiro em cima da corrupção do Estado Brasileiro, enquanto a maior parte da população vê o seu dinheiro sendo corroído. Para eles está tudo bem, para o brasileiro médio, não.
The G in AGI stands for "general".
General intelligence does not mean that you have been specifically trained for a large range of tasks. It means you can approach any NEW task and figure it out, just like humans do.
If regular people can do it on their own (no guidance, no tools), why should AGI require special handholding and handcrafted instructions? If it's AGI, why would there still be a human in the loop, using their own human intelligence to guide the model on every new task?