@libsoftiktok@WFCPreacher It is because of the State Attorney in Hillsborough County, Suzie Lopez. She is making some horrible choices that @RonDeSantis would probably be upset by. She is against cops and Christians. If anyone wants the cop story let me know.
Sen. John Fetterman pushes back on Bernie Sanders, arguing he’s helping install “volatile and dangerous” candidates while putting Democratic seats at risk:
“I’d just like to remind everybody watching right now that Bernie Sanders has never represented more than about 640,000 people in Vermont. That’s all he’s ever done, and that’s all he ever will do. He has never won a truly competitive election. So why does he keep giving me lectures on how to win? Bernie’s not flipping seats. He’s helping install volatile and dangerous candidates and putting Democratic seats at risk. I’ve flipped seats. He’s never done that. I’m tired of his lectures. He also says he’s not a member of the Democratic Party. So why don’t the DSA candidates just run as their own party? I think it’s important to remind people who’s driving a lot of this conversation.”
🚨 THEY LITERALLY SAID IT OUT LOUD.
An Abdul El-Sayed supporter just admitted:
“The encouraging thing is that people are stupid. This politics of no translation will be the way forward.”
Abdul El-Sayed and Hasan Piker sat there… and NODDED.
This is their entire strategy.
Hide the radical agenda.
Speak in code.
Count on Michigan voters being too dumb to notice.
They don’t respect you.
They don’t fear you.
They think you’re STUPID.
Mike Rogers is the only adult left in the room.
Michigan… WAKE THE HELL UP before it’s too late.
This is the quiet part. They just said it. Share this everywhere.
@Milajoy That is not to say that the #GOP@GOP doesn't have some problems too. Um... Has any one seen Mitch? That is an epic problem @GOP, WTH are you all thinking let that go on?
@Milajoy When you actually stop to think of the platform of both parties, and then say them out loud, only one makes logical sense, the #GOP is the clear choice. #DNC is illogical and immoral.
Yep. I promise I am not supporting what this asshole is saying, I am saying that it is up to the line legally. Hence he didn't get arrested. In the United States, under the First Amendment, most speech—including advocacy of violence, political hyperbole, offensive rhetoric, or abstract calls for lawbreaking—is protected. Only narrow categories fall outside protection. The two most relevant for “threatening” speech or “calls for violence” are true threats and incitement to imminent lawless action. These standards are high by design to avoid chilling protected expression. Had he named an individual, a place, a time, or any specifics, he would have crossed the line.
I didn't abide by the lock down the first time, and I won't the next time. The government doesn't have that authority, sorry. It is a civil rights violation. The US Constitution does not grant government to say "its an emergency so you have to listen and do what we say" provision. The framers are rolling over in the graves on how far the republic has been twisted on things like this.
I promise I am not supporting what this asshole is saying, I am saying that it is up to the line legally. Hence he didn't get arrested. In the United States, under the First Amendment, most speech—including advocacy of violence, political hyperbole, offensive rhetoric, or abstract calls for lawbreaking—is protected. Only narrow categories fall outside protection. The two most relevant for “threatening” speech or “calls for violence” are true threats and incitement to imminent lawless action.
These standards are high by design to avoid chilling protected expression. Had he named an individual, a place, a time, or any specifics, he would have crossed the line.
@GavinNewsom Hey @GavinNewsom I think you account was hacked. You posted this lame response when every real number shows that CA routinely needing federal government to stay afloat. Also, how is that train to nowhere coming along???
You want to know what really just pisses me off... I am a conservative republican, and I have a serious problem with the benefits these politicians get. She spent five years "working for the people", but she gets a pension. For the record, the pension is modest. One analysis around the time of her resignation estimated that at age 62 she would be eligible for roughly $8,700 per year under the FERS formula for members—well below the average for longer-serving retirees. Eligibility for an unreduced pension generally begins at age 62 with 5 years of service (or earlier with much longer service: age 50 with 20 years, or any age with 25 years). She was born in 1974, so the earliest standard start date would be around 2036. That is only after 5 years, these career politicians are already double dipping. No other job other than "politicians" have this kind of pension program. We need to cut off the bullshit money these politicians on both sides of the isle make.
With President Trump back in office, I formally request the repeal of the current gas can restrictions and a return to the simple, functional design that served us for decades.
Signed,
Every red-blooded, hard-working American @epaleezeldin
@ScottPresler Why can't you make the motion? Why does the Senate still act like they are some court of kings, you are supposed to representative of your constituents, not be beholden to "gentlemen agreements" like those stupid blue checks, and your month long vacations...