@Texas_Shanesaw_@BxLRiley@howertonjosh It proves it was irrelevant what language He spoke in. Regardless, Matthew under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit on purpose wrote in Greek and used two different words to capture the context of what Jesus was saying.
@PonderHart@Dracones24601@MJKelleyII Yes, it does - that’s what Catholics don’t understand. But none of that changes the fact that what you originally cited doesn’t relate directly to baptism. Take the L fool- you are unteachable and unrepentant.
@JoReKeo@MJKelleyII And if you will look, I specifically mentioned the right dividing of the word. That’s how you know if the person is a demon or not. Catholic doctrine is based on a false gospel. That’s how you know it’s demonic.
@Cee10William@moose_con@sola_chad Ha ha ha ha ha - you won’t refuse it because you can’t. That’s what all you Catholics do when faced with reality, you tuck your tail and run.
@PonderHart@Dracones24601@MJKelleyII If you will read what I wrote, those are not the original text that you cited. Yes, it’s clear what Paul thought about baptism, but once again they are not related to the original verses you cited.
@Catholic_Haze We don’t need 2 foundations. The Apostles are Prophets were the foundation with Christ as the chief cornerstone.
If you have to build upon the foundation withe the pope and bishops, then that’s a second foundation.