FXKLM

[FXKLM @FXKML]

@RichardHanania He's going to take up a seat for himself plus a section for his security team, which will be paid by taxpayers.

The high prices aren't an outrage in general, but it absolutely is an outrage for Trump to attend.

[FXKLM @FXKML]

@JosephKahn @ProblemTomatoes Interference from executives is not nearly as smothering as interference from unions. Hollywood will never recover until the unions die.

[FXKLM @FXKML]

@DominicJPino @Paragon_Inst If the estimated eligible population is only 636,000 then you probably have a terrible method of estimating the eligible population.

[FXKLM @FXKML]

@jasonc_nc @_giacomo_volpe_ @big_pedestrian It's the modern definition of neoliberal, which is "I don't like it."

[FXKLM @FXKML]

@tracewoodgrains Funniest part is a guy in the replies who is anti-AIPAC because he thinks it's a PAC for AI companies.

[FXKLM @FXKML]

@philofsurprises @terronk No, that's not what AIPAC is.

[FXKLM @FXKML]

@Thepeoplesfool @rnelson0 @SamRo Answer is (c) is that it's not clear. Without more information, it's not clear. That is not an assumption.

[FXKLM @FXKML]

@Thepeoplesfool @SamRo No, saying there isn't enough information to answer is not making any assumptions about the missing information.

[FXKLM @FXKML]

@dwofthepeople @SamRo Oh, absolutely not. LSAT questions are much more carefully drafted. Wannabe lawyers will most definitely complain about this kind of ambiguity.

On the LSAT, I would be highly confident that (c) is correct.

[FXKLM @FXKML]

@Thepeoplesfool @SamRo He isn't making assumptions about facts not in the question. He's recognizing that those facts are missing.

[FXKLM @FXKML]

@BikeLanesBoston @TaylorLorenzNOT @BrettSlagh @SamRo The question could easily say "Is she able to buy more or less with these savings" and would be unambiguous.

As written, (c) is the objectively correct answer, and a reasonable person wouldn't be cerain which answer was intended to be correct.

[FXKLM @FXKML]

@ThatSpringerNH A subdivision with 100 identical houses is bland conformity. An apartment building with 100 identical units is full of unique, bohemian souls.

[FXKLM @FXKML]

@EsotericCD A surprisingly large percentage of the people who try to exploit confidential information to trade are stupid enough to still lose money. Bill Pulte could easily fall into that category.

[FXKLM @FXKML]

@tomri33le @mattyglesias @jbarro That's not really a principle, just a vague notion of a tradeoff. Some measure of surveillance is okay. "We think there should be less" is a general preference. It's not a principle.

[FXKLM @FXKML]

@tomri33le @mattyglesias @jbarro But there isn't even really a clear principle here.

[FXKLM @FXKML]

@senatorshoshana I mostly got Spotify to play songs for my baby daughter. But then I also use it for a black metal workout list. So I think Spotify just finds me very confusing.

[FXKLM @FXKML]

@senatorshoshana Probably easier to be in the top 1% if there are a lot of listeners. There are going to be a whole lot of people who only listen to one song.

Most of the bands I listen to have <10,000 listeners, which makes it much harder to hit the top 1%.

[FXKLM @FXKML]

@RichardHanania He deserved to be fired for cause and lose his pension. That would have been a reasonable and proportionate punishment.

[FXKLM @FXKML]

@viceroy_gaga 99% of the complaints before Elon and 99% of the complaints after Elon have nothing to do with the technical performance of Twitter.

The software engineering doesn't really matter so you may as well try to do it cheaply.

[FXKLM @FXKML]

@sunnyright The point is that Trump can say there is a ceasefire, and most of the influential figures on the right are too afraid of him to disagree.